Rechtsprechung
   EGMR, 12.04.2007 - 9253/06   

Zitiervorschläge
https://dejure.org/2007,70314
EGMR, 12.04.2007 - 9253/06 (https://dejure.org/2007,70314)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 12.04.2007 - 9253/06 (https://dejure.org/2007,70314)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 12. April 2007 - 9253/06 (https://dejure.org/2007,70314)
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2007,70314) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.

Volltextveröffentlichung

 
Sortierung



Kontextvorschau





Hinweis: Klicken Sie auf das Sprechblasensymbol, um eine Kontextvorschau im Fließtext zu sehen. Um alle zu sehen, genügt ein Doppelklick.

Wird zitiert von ... (0)Neu Zitiert selbst (4)

  • EGMR, 30.06.2005 - 11931/03

    TETERINY v. RUSSIA

    Auszug aus EGMR, 12.04.2007 - 9253/06
    The Court has frequently found violations of Article 6 § 1 of the Convention and Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 in cases raising issues similar to the ones in the present case (see Malinovskiy v. Russia, no. 41302/02, § 35 et seq., ECHR 2005; Teteriny v. Russia, no. 11931/03, § 41 et seq., 9 June 2005; Gizzatova v. Russia, no. 5124/03, § 19 et seq., 13 January 2005; Burdov, cited above, § 34 et seq., ECHR 2002-III).

    As regards the non-pecuniary damage, the applicant should be granted the same amount as the applicants in the cases of Teteriny v. Russia (no. 11931/03, 30 June 2005) and Shpakovskiy v. Russia (no. 41307/02, 7 July 2005).

  • EGMR, 07.07.2005 - 41302/02

    MALINOVSKIY v. RUSSIA

    Auszug aus EGMR, 12.04.2007 - 9253/06
    The Court has frequently found violations of Article 6 § 1 of the Convention and Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 in cases raising issues similar to the ones in the present case (see Malinovskiy v. Russia, no. 41302/02, § 35 et seq., ECHR 2005; Teteriny v. Russia, no. 11931/03, § 41 et seq., 9 June 2005; Gizzatova v. Russia, no. 5124/03, § 19 et seq., 13 January 2005; Burdov, cited above, § 34 et seq., ECHR 2002-III).

    However, the Court reiterates that it is not open to a State authority to cite the lack of funds or other resources, such as housing, as an excuse for not honouring a judgment debt (see Malinovskiy v. Russia, no. 41302/02, § 35, 16 June 2005; Plotnikovy v. Russia, no. 43883/02, § 23, 24 February 2005).

  • EGMR, 07.05.2002 - 59498/00

    BURDOV v. RUSSIA

    Auszug aus EGMR, 12.04.2007 - 9253/06
    The Court considers that this complaint falls to be examined under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention and Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 (see Burdov v. Russia, no. 59498/00, § 26, ECHR 2002-III).
  • EGMR, 13.01.2005 - 5124/03

    GIZZATOVA v. RUSSIA

    Auszug aus EGMR, 12.04.2007 - 9253/06
    The Court has frequently found violations of Article 6 § 1 of the Convention and Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 in cases raising issues similar to the ones in the present case (see Malinovskiy v. Russia, no. 41302/02, § 35 et seq., ECHR 2005; Teteriny v. Russia, no. 11931/03, § 41 et seq., 9 June 2005; Gizzatova v. Russia, no. 5124/03, § 19 et seq., 13 January 2005; Burdov, cited above, § 34 et seq., ECHR 2002-III).
Haben Sie eine Ergänzung? Oder haben Sie einen Fehler gefunden? Schreiben Sie uns.
Sie können auswählen (Maus oder Pfeiltasten):
(Liste aufgrund Ihrer bisherigen Eingabe)
Komplette Übersicht