Volltextveröffentlichungen (3)

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  R.B. v. HUNGARY

  Remainder inadmissible (Article 35-3 - Manifestly ill-founded);Violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8 - Positive obligations;Article 8-1 - Respect for private life);Non-pecuniary damage - award (Article 41 - Non-pecuniary ...

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  R.B. v. HUNGARY - [Deutsche Übersetzung] Zusammenfassung durch das Österreichische Institut für Menschenrechte (ÖIM)

  [DEU] Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-a) Manifestly ill-founded;Violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8 - Positive obligations;Article 8-1 - Respect for private life);Non-pecuniary damage - ...

• juris(Abodienst) (Volltext/Leitsatz)

Besprechungen u.ä.

• verfassungsblog.de (Entscheidungsbesprechung)

  Anti-Roma-Märsche in Ungarn: Staat muss Anzeichen auf Hasskriminalität nachgehen

Sonstiges

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  R.B. v. HUNGARY

  Art. 3, Art. 8, Art. 8 Abs. 1, Art. 14, Art. 35 MRK
  [ENG]

Wird zitiert von ... (13)Neu Zitiert selbst (17)

• EGMR, 12.07.2005 - 64320/01

  Auszug aus EGMR, 12.04.2016 - 64602/12

  41138/98 and 64320/01, § 111, ECHR 2005-VII (extracts), and B.S. v. Spain, no. 47159/08, § 41, 24 July 2012).
• EGMR, 06.07.2005 - 43579/98

  Auszug aus EGMR, 12.04.2016 - 64602/12

  It maintained that the Court's analysis under Article 14 read in conjunction with the procedural limb of Article 2 or Article 3 (see, for example, Nachova and Others v. Bulgaria [GC], nos. 43577/98 and 43579/98, ECHR 2005-VII, and Secic v. Croatia, no. 40116/02, 31 May 2007) was limited in that it had not addressed the question whether the failure to carry out an effective investigation in general had been due to institutional racism.
• EGMR, 04.12.2008 - 30566/04

  Auszug aus EGMR, 12.04.2016 - 64602/12

  The Court has accepted in the past that an individual's ethnic identity must be regarded as another such element (see S. and Marper v. the United Kingdom [GC], nos. 30562/04 and 30566/04, § 66, ECHR 2008, and Ciubotaru v. Moldova, no. 27138/04, § 49, 27 April 2010).

 
• EGMR, 20.03.2008 - 15339/02

  BUDAYEVA AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 12.04.2016 - 64602/12

  Indeed, where an applicant has a choice of remedies and their comparative effectiveness is not obvious, the Court tends to interpret the requirement of exhaustion of domestic remedies in the applicant's favour (see Budayeva and Others v. Russia, nos. 15339/02, 21166/02, 20058/02, 11673/02 and 15343/02, § 110, ECHR 2008 (extracts), and the cases cited therein).
• EGMR, 12.04.2007 - 48130/99

  IVAN VASILEV v. BULGARIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 12.04.2016 - 64602/12

  Moreover, an applicant who has used a remedy which is apparently effective and sufficient cannot be required also to have tried others that were also available but probably no more likely to be successful (see Ivan Vasilev v. Bulgaria, no. 48130/99, § 56, 12 April 2007 and the cases cited therein).
• EGMR, 06.04.2000 - 26772/95

  LABITA c. ITALIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 12.04.2016 - 64602/12

  The Court has considered some types of treatment "inhuman", particularly where it was premeditated, was applied for hours at a stretch and caused either actual bodily injury or intense physical and mental suffering, and also "degrading" because it was such as to arouse in its victims feelings of fear, anguish and inferiority capable of humiliating and debasing them (see, among other authorities, Labita v. Italy [GC], no. 26772/95, § 120, ECHR 2000-IV).
• EGMR, 25.04.1978 - 5856/72

  Zur "Einzelfallprüfung" und "geltungszeitlichen Interpretation" im Rahmen des …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 12.04.2016 - 64602/12

  Even where the victim did not suffer serious or lasting physical injuries, the Court has held that corporal punishment inflicted on an adolescent should be described as "degrading" in so far as it constituted an assault on "precisely that which it is one of the main purposes of Article 3 to protect, namely a person's dignity and physical integrity" (see Tyrer v. United Kingdom, 25 April 1978, § 33, Series A no. 26).
• EGMR, 24.07.2012 - 47159/08

  B.S. c. ESPAGNE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 12.04.2016 - 64602/12

  41138/98 and 64320/01, § 111, ECHR 2005-VII (extracts), and B.S. v. Spain, no. 47159/08, § 41, 24 July 2012).
• EGMR, 25.03.1993 - 13134/87

  Zur "Einzelfallprüfung" und "geltungszeitlichen Interpretation" im Rahmen des …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 12.04.2016 - 64602/12

  The Court's case-law does not rule out that treatment which does not reach a level of severity sufficient to bring it within the ambit of Article 3 may nonetheless breach the private-life aspect of Article 8, if the effects on the applicant's physical and moral integrity are sufficiently adverse (see Khan v. Germany, no. 38030/12, § 35, 23 April 2015, and Costello-Roberts v. the United Kingdom, 25 March 1993, § 36, Series A no. 247-C).
• EGMR, 05.07.2005 - 56195/00

  KRUMPEL AND KRUMPELOVA v. SLOVAKIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 12.04.2016 - 64602/12

  Where there is a choice of remedies open to an applicant, Article 35 must be applied to reflect the practical realities of the applicant's position in order to ensure the effective protection of the rights and freedoms guaranteed by the Convention (see, inter alia, Hilal v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 45276/99, 8 February 2000, and Krumpel and Krumpelova v. Slovakia, no. 56195/00, § 43, 5 July 2005).
• EGMR, 31.05.2007 - 40116/02

  SECIC c. CROATIE
• EGMR, 28.07.1999 - 25803/94

  Zur "Einzelfallprüfung" und "geltungszeitlichen Interpretation" im Rahmen des …
• EKMR, 14.12.1973 - 4403/70
• EGMR, 28.05.1985 - 9214/80

  ABDULAZIZ, CABALES AND BALKANDALI v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
• EGMR, 06.03.2001 - 45276/99

  Tansania, CUF, Civic United Front, Oppositionelle, Inhaftierung, Folter, …
• EGMR, 04.12.2008 - 30562/04

  S. und Marper ./. Vereinigtes Königreich
• EGMR, 20.03.2008 - 21166/02

• EGMR, 14.01.2020 - 41288/15

  BEIZARAS AND LEVICKAS v. LITHUANIA

  The Court has likewise accepted that criminal-law measures were required with respect to direct verbal assaults and physical threats motivated by discriminatory attitudes (see R.B. v. Hungary, no. 64602/12, §§ 80 and 84-85, 12 April 2016; Király and Dömötör v. Hungary, no. 10851/13, § 76, 17 January 2017; and Alkovic v. Montenegro, no. 66895/10, §§ 8, 11, 65 and 69, 5 December 2017).
• EGMR, 11.04.2024 - 81249/17

  ALLOUCHE c. FRANCE

  Maîtresse de qualification juridique, la Cour considère que ce grief relève de l'article 8 combiné avec l'article 14 de la Convention qui s'appliquent ratione materiae dans la présente affaire (voir R.B. c. Hongrie, no 64602/12, §§ 78-80, 12 avril 2016, Alkovic c. Monténégro, no 66895/10, § 46, 5 décembre 2017, Beizaras et Levickas c. Lituanie, no 41288/15, § 117, 14 janvier 2020, et Association ACCEPT et autres c. Roumanie, no 19237/16, §§ 62-68, 1er juin 2021, ainsi que, mutatis mutandis, dans le contexte de l'article 3, Skorjanec c. Croatie, no 25536/14, §§ 37-38, 28 mars 2017 (extraits), et Balázs c. Hongrie, no 15529/12, § 54, 20 octobre 2015).
• Generalanwalt beim EuGH, 14.05.2020 - C-30/19

  Braathens Regional Aviation - Vorlage zur Vorabentscheidung - Richtlinie …

  47 Vgl. in diesem Sinne Urteil des EGMR vom 12. April 2016, R.B./Ungarn (CE:ECHR:2016:0412JUD006460212, Nr. 81).

 
• EGMR, 06.11.2018 - 3289/10

  BURLYA AND OTHERS v. UKRAINE

  It should also be emphasised that Article 3 cannot be limited to acts of physical ill-treatment; it also covers the infliction of psychological suffering (see R.B. v. Hungary, no. 64602/12, § 45, 12 April 2016).
• EGMR, 30.08.2022 - 47358/20

  C. v. ROMANIA

  The Court's task is not to substitute itself for the competent domestic authorities in determining the most appropriate methods of protecting individuals from attacks on their personal integrity, but rather to review under the Convention the decisions that those authorities have taken in the exercise of their power of appreciation (see R.B. v. Hungary, no. 64602/12, §§ 81-82, 12 April 2016).
• EGMR, 30.11.2023 - 24225/19

  GEORGIAN MUSLIM RELATIONS AND OTHERS v. GEORGIA

  The Court's assessment 67. The Court notes that the applicants instituted criminal, civil anti-discrimination, and administrative proceedings and that they cannot be criticised, in view of the Court's relevant case-law, for not attempting to pursue another remedy (see, among others, Mikeladze and Others v. Georgia, no. 54217/16, § 52, 16 November 2021; see also R.B. v. Hungary, no. 64602/12, §§ 61-62, 12 April 2016; and Budinova and Chaprazov v. Bulgaria, no. 12567/13, § 76, 16 February 2021).
• EGMR, 05.12.2017 - 66895/10

  ALKOVIC v. MONTENEGRO

  4149/04 and 41029/04, § 58-59, ECHR 2012; Sandra Jankovic v. Croatia, no. 38478/05, §§ 44-46, 5 March 2009; and R.B. v. Hungary, no. 64602/12, § 78 and §§ 81-84, 12 April 2016; and, as regards Article 14, in Nachova and Others v. Bulgaria [GC], nos.
• EGMR, 17.01.2017 - 42079/12

  B.K.M. LOJISTIK TASIMACILIK TICARET LIMITED SIRKETI v. SLOVENIA

  Article 35 of the Convention must be applied in a manner corresponding to the reality of the applicant's situation in order to guarantee the effective protection of the rights and freedoms in the Convention (see, among other authorities, Airey v. Ireland, 9 October 1979, § 23, Series A no. 32, and R.B. v. Hungary, no. 64602/12 § 60, 12 April 2016).
• EGMR, 30.03.2023 - 24408/16

  SZOLCSÁN v. HUNGARY

  Moreover, an applicant who has used a remedy which is apparently effective and sufficient cannot be required also to have tried others that were also available but probably no more likely to be successful (see R.B. v. Hungary, no. 64602/12, § 60, 12 April 2016, and the cases cited therein).
• EGMR, 01.04.2021 - 54476/14

  PASTRAMA v. UKRAINE

  However, the Court's case-law does not rule out that treatment which does not reach a level of severity sufficient to bring it within the ambit of Article 3 may nonetheless breach the private-life aspect of Article 8, if the effects on the applicant's physical and moral integrity are sufficiently adverse (see, mutatis mutandis, Costello-Roberts v. the United Kingdom, 25 March 1993, § 36, Series A no. 247-C; Wainwright v. the United Kingdom, no. 12350/04, § 43, ECHR 2006-X; and R.B. v. Hungary, no. 64602/12, § 79, 12 April 2016).
• EGMR, 19.05.2022 - 621/14

  L.F. v. HUNGARY
• EGMR, 17.01.2023 - 39375/19

  VALAITIS v. LITHUANIA
• EGMR, 31.10.2017 - 45855/12

  M.F. v. HUNGARY