Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 12.05.2009 - 42268/04 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2009,61175) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
LORINCZ v. ROMANIA
Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 37, Art. 37 Abs. 1 MRK
Struck out of the list (englisch)
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (6)
- EGMR, 27.06.2000 - 30979/96
FRYDLENDER c. FRANCE
Auszug aus EGMR, 12.05.2009 - 42268/04
The Court has established in a number of cases, including those brought against Romania, its practice concerning complaints of violation of the right to a hearing within a reasonable time (see, for example, Frydlender v. France [GC], no. 30979/96, § 43, ECHR 2000-VII; Cocchiarella v. Italy [GC], no. 64886/01, §§ 69-98, ECHR 2006-....; Cârstea and Grecu v. Romania, no. 56326/00, 15 June 2006; and Craiu v. Romania, no. 26662/02, 7 October 2008). - EGMR, 01.03.2005 - 53487/99
MERIAKRI v. MOLDOVA
Auszug aus EGMR, 12.05.2009 - 42268/04
To this end, the Court will examine carefully the declaration in the light of the principles emerging from its case-law, in particular Tahsin Acar v. Turkey, [GC], no. 26307/95, §§ 75-77, ECHR 2003-VI; Meriakri v. Moldova (striking out), no. 53487/99, 1 March 2005); WAZA Spólka z o.o. v. Poland (dec.), no. 11602/02, 26 June 2007; and Lazar v. Romania (dec.), no. 30159/03, 25 November 2008. - EGMR, 15.06.2006 - 56326/00
CÂRSTEA AND GRECU c. ROUMANIE
Auszug aus EGMR, 12.05.2009 - 42268/04
The Court has established in a number of cases, including those brought against Romania, its practice concerning complaints of violation of the right to a hearing within a reasonable time (see, for example, Frydlender v. France [GC], no. 30979/96, § 43, ECHR 2000-VII; Cocchiarella v. Italy [GC], no. 64886/01, §§ 69-98, ECHR 2006-....; Cârstea and Grecu v. Romania, no. 56326/00, 15 June 2006; and Craiu v. Romania, no. 26662/02, 7 October 2008).
- EGMR, 26.06.2007 - 11602/02
SPÓLKA Z O.O. WAZA v. POLAND
Auszug aus EGMR, 12.05.2009 - 42268/04
To this end, the Court will examine carefully the declaration in the light of the principles emerging from its case-law, in particular Tahsin Acar v. Turkey, [GC], no. 26307/95, §§ 75-77, ECHR 2003-VI; Meriakri v. Moldova (striking out), no. 53487/99, 1 March 2005); WAZA Spólka z o.o. v. Poland (dec.), no. 11602/02, 26 June 2007; and Lazar v. Romania (dec.), no. 30159/03, 25 November 2008. - EGMR, 07.10.2008 - 26662/02
CRAIU v. ROMANIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 12.05.2009 - 42268/04
The Court has established in a number of cases, including those brought against Romania, its practice concerning complaints of violation of the right to a hearing within a reasonable time (see, for example, Frydlender v. France [GC], no. 30979/96, § 43, ECHR 2000-VII; Cocchiarella v. Italy [GC], no. 64886/01, §§ 69-98, ECHR 2006-....; Cârstea and Grecu v. Romania, no. 56326/00, 15 June 2006; and Craiu v. Romania, no. 26662/02, 7 October 2008). - EGMR, 25.11.2008 - 30159/03
LAZAR c. ROUMANIE
Auszug aus EGMR, 12.05.2009 - 42268/04
To this end, the Court will examine carefully the declaration in the light of the principles emerging from its case-law, in particular Tahsin Acar v. Turkey, [GC], no. 26307/95, §§ 75-77, ECHR 2003-VI; Meriakri v. Moldova (striking out), no. 53487/99, 1 March 2005); WAZA Spólka z o.o. v. Poland (dec.), no. 11602/02, 26 June 2007; and Lazar v. Romania (dec.), no. 30159/03, 25 November 2008.