Rechtsprechung
   EGMR, 12.05.2016 - 26711/07, 32786/10, 34278/10   

Sie müssen eingeloggt sein, um diese Funktion zu nutzen.

Sie haben noch kein Nutzerkonto? In weniger als einer Minute ist es eingerichtet und Sie können sofort diese und weitere kostenlose Zusatzfunktionen nutzen.

| | Was ist die Merkfunktion?
Ablegen in
Benachrichtigen, wenn:




 
Alle auswählen
 

Zitiervorschläge

https://dejure.org/2016,9902
EGMR, 12.05.2016 - 26711/07, 32786/10, 34278/10 (https://dejure.org/2016,9902)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 12.05.2016 - 26711/07, 32786/10, 34278/10 (https://dejure.org/2016,9902)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 12. Mai 2016 - 26711/07, 32786/10, 34278/10 (https://dejure.org/2016,9902)
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2016,9902) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.

Volltextveröffentlichung

  • Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

    POLETAN AND AZIROVIK v. "THE FORMER YUGOSLAV REPUBLIC OF MACEDONIA"

    Remainder inadmissible;No violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Criminal proceedings;Article 6-1 - Fair hearing);No violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Criminal proceedings;Article 6-2 - Presumption of innocence) ...

Sonstiges

 
Sortierung



Kontextvorschau





Hinweis: Klicken Sie auf das Sprechblasensymbol, um eine Kontextvorschau im Fließtext zu sehen. Um alle zu sehen, genügt ein Doppelklick.

Wird zitiert von ... (11)

  • EGMR, 10.10.2017 - 37272/08

    DASTAN v. TURKEY

    Thus, it remains for the Court to conduct its own assessment on this issue (see Poletan and Azirovik v. the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, no. 26711/07 and 2 others, § 88, 12 May 2016, and Manucharyan v. Armenia, no. 35688/11, § 55, 24 November 2016).
  • EGMR, 12.01.2017 - 54146/09

    BÁTĚK AND OTHERS v. THE CZECH REPUBLIC

    There are exceptions to this principle, but they must not infringe the rights of the defence; as a general rule, Article 6 §§ 1 and 3 (d) require that the defendant be given an adequate and proper opportunity to challenge and question a witness against him, either when he makes his statements or at a later stage (see Poletan and Azirovik v. the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, no. 26711/07, 32786/10 and 34278/10, § 81, 12 May 2016).
  • EGMR, 10.07.2018 - 22963/08

    ISHAK SAGLAM v. TURKEY

    Accordingly, the Court must make its own assessment of the weight of the evidence given by N.S. and S.A., having regard to the strength of the additional incriminating evidence available (see Schatschaschwili, cited above, § 143; Poletan and Azirovik v. the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, no. 26711/07 and 2 others, § 88, 12 May 2016; and Dastan v. Turkey, no. 37272/08, § 25, 10 October 2017).
  • EGMR, 27.04.2017 - 3571/09

    ASATRYAN v. ARMENIA

    The Court further reiterates that as a general rule, Article 6 §§ 1 and 3 (d) require that the defendant be given an adequate and proper opportunity to challenge and question a witness against him, either when he makes his statements or at a later stage (see Al-Khawaja and Tahery v. the United Kingdom [GC], nos. 26766/05 and 22228/06, § 118, ECHR 2011; Poletan and Azirovik v. the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, no. 26711/07, 32786/10 and 34278/10, § 81, 12 May 2016).
  • EGMR, 02.03.2017 - 16980/06

    PALCHIK v. UKRAINE

    The applicant, therefore, must be deemed to have waived his right to examine N., P. and Zh. at the trial (compare Poletan and Azirovik v. the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, no. 26711/07, 32786/10 and 34278/10, § 87, 12 May 2016).
  • EGMR, 24.11.2016 - 35688/11

    MANUCHARYAN v. ARMENIA

    The Court must therefore make its own assessment of the weight of the evidence given by the absent witness, having regard to the other incriminating evidence available (see Schatschaschwili, cited above, § 143; and Poletan and Azirovik v. the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, no. 26711/07, 32786/10 and 34278/10, § 88, 12 May 2016).
  • EGMR, 10.11.2016 - 13479/11

    AVETISYAN v. ARMENIA

    The Court must therefore make its own assessment of the weight of the evidence given by the absent witnesses having regard to the additional incriminating evidence available (see Schatschaschwili, cited above, § 143; Poletan and Azirovik v. the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, nos. 26711/07, 32786/10 and 34278/10, § 88, 12 May 2016).
  • EGMR, 22.11.2018 - 1837/10

    AVAGYAN v. ARMENIA

    The Court further reiterates that as a general rule, Article 6 §§ 1 and 3 (d) requires that the defendant be given an adequate and proper opportunity to challenge and question a witness against him, either when he makes his statements or at a later stage (see Al-Khawaja and Tahery v. the United Kingdom [GC], nos. 26766/05 and 22228/06, § 118, ECHR 2011, and Poletan and Azirovik v. the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, nos. 26711/07, 32786/10 and 34278/10, § 81, 12 May 2016).
  • EGMR, 06.09.2018 - 14078/12

    DADAYAN v. ARMENIA

    The Court further reiterates that, as a general rule, Article 6 §§ 1 and 3 (d) require that the defendant be given an adequate and proper opportunity to challenge and question a witness against him, either when he makes his statements or at a later stage (see Al-Khawaja and Tahery, cited above, § 118, and Poletan and Azirovik v. the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, nos. 26711/07, 32786/10 and 34278/10, § 81, 12 May 2016).
  • EGMR, 23.05.2017 - 52874/10

    ZIBERI AND OTHERS v. "THE FORMER YUGOSLAV REPUBLIC OF MACEDONIA"

    In this regard, they submitted that the present case is similar to the case of Poletan and Azirovik v. the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia (no. 26711/07, 32786/10 and 34278/10, 12 May 2016).
  • EGMR, 27.10.2016 - 27866/10

    TER-SARGSYAN v. ARMENIA

Haben Sie eine Ergänzung? Oder haben Sie einen Fehler gefunden? Schreiben Sie uns.
Neu: Die Merklistenfunktion erreichen Sie nun über das Lesezeichen oben.
Sie können auswählen (Maus oder Pfeiltasten):
(Liste aufgrund Ihrer bisherigen Eingabe)
Komplette Übersicht