Volltextveröffentlichungen (2)

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  RINGLER v. AUSTRIA

  Inadmissible (englisch)

• juris(Abodienst) (Volltext/Leitsatz)

Sonstiges

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  RINGLER v. AUSTRIA

  Art. 8, Art. 8 Abs. 2, Art. 13, Art. 34 MRK
  [ENG]

Wird zitiert von ...Neu Zitiert selbst (3)

• EGMR, 06.09.1978 - 5029/71

  Klass u.a. ./. Deutschland

  Auszug aus EGMR, 12.05.2020 - 2309/10

  Referring to the case-law of the European Court of Human Rights (Klass and Others v. Germany, 6 September 1978, Series A no. 28, and Weber and Saravia v. Germany (dec.), no. 54934/00, ECHR 2006-XI), the Constitutional Court observed that section 53(3a) and (3b) of the SPA did not regulate secret surveillance of communications but merely empowered the police authorities to obtain specific information about telephone or internet users from providers of telecommunications services.

  As to the applicant´s victim status, the Court has constantly held that its task is not normally to review the relevant law and practice in abstracto, but to determine whether the manner in which they were applied to, or affected, the applicant gave rise to a violation of the Convention (see, inter alia, Klass and Others v. Germany, 6 September 1978, § 33, Series A no. 28, and more recently Szabó and Vissy v. Hungary, no. 37138/14, § 32, 12 January 2016, Kosaité-Cypiené and Others v. Lithuania, no. 69489/12, § 67, 4 June 2019).

• EGMR, 29.06.2006 - 54934/00

  Menschenrechte: Verletzung der Privatsphäre und des Briefgeheimnisses durch das …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 12.05.2020 - 2309/10

  Referring to the case-law of the European Court of Human Rights (Klass and Others v. Germany, 6 September 1978, Series A no. 28, and Weber and Saravia v. Germany (dec.), no. 54934/00, ECHR 2006-XI), the Constitutional Court observed that section 53(3a) and (3b) of the SPA did not regulate secret surveillance of communications but merely empowered the police authorities to obtain specific information about telephone or internet users from providers of telecommunications services.
• EGMR, 04.12.2015 - 47143/06

  EGMR verurteilt Russland wegen geheimer Telefonüberwachung

  Auszug aus EGMR, 12.05.2020 - 2309/10

  In such cases, the individual may claim to be a victim of a violation occasioned by the mere existence of secret measures or of legislation permitting secret measures only if he is able to show that, due to his personal situation, he is potentially at risk of being subjected to such measures (Roman Zakharov v. Russia ([GC], no. 47143/06, § 171, ECHR 2015 which concerned covert interception of mobile telephone communications).

• EGMR, 11.01.2022 - 70078/12

  EKIMDZHIEV AND OTHERS v. BULGARIA

  The Government were, however, vague on the point, contenting themselves to say that the 2019 amendment had introduced provisions governing the liability of communications service providers and the relevant authorities in respect of retained and accessed communications data (see paragraphs 363 and 388 above, and contrast the circumstances in Ringler v. Austria (dec.) [Committee], no. 2309/10, §§ 12-13 and 51-54, 15 May 2020).