Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  KOKY AND OTHERS v. SLOVAKIA

  Art. 3, Art. 41 MRK
  Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Effective investigation) (Procedural aspect) Pecuniary damage - claim dismissed (Article 41 - Pecuniary damage) Non-pecuniary damage - award (Article 41 - Non-pecuniary damage) (englisch)

Verfahrensgang

• EGMR, 22.09.2009 - 13624/03
• EGMR, 12.06.2012 - 13624/03
• EGMR, 10.03.2017 - 13624/03

Wird zitiert von ... (4)Neu Zitiert selbst (5)

• EGMR, 06.05.2003 - 47916/99

  MENSON contre le ROYAUME-UNI

  Auszug aus EGMR, 12.06.2012 - 13624/03

  In reaching this conclusion, the Court has taken into account the particular importance for an investigation into an attack with racial overtones to be pursued with vigour and impartiality, having regard to the need to reassert continuously society's condemnation of racism and to maintain the confidence of minorities in the ability of the authorities to protect them from the threat of racist violence (see, mutatis mutandis, Menson v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 47916/99, ECHR 2003-V).
• EGMR, 17.12.2004 - 33348/96

  CUMPANA AND MAZARE v. ROMANIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 12.06.2012 - 13624/03

  Accordingly, the Court does not award any sum under this head (see CumpÇ?nÇ? and MazÇ?re v. Romania [GC], no. 33348/96, §§ 133-134, ECHR 2004-XI).
• EGMR, 10.07.2001 - 33394/96

  PRICE v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

  Auszug aus EGMR, 12.06.2012 - 13624/03

  The Court also reiterates that the ill-treatment suffered must attain a minimum level of severity if it is to fall within the scope of Article 3. The assessment of this minimum is relative: it depends on all the circumstances of the case, such as the nature and context of the treatment, its duration, its physical and mental effects and, in some instances, the sex, age and state of health of the victim (see Price v. the United Kingdom, no. 33394/96, § 24, ECHR 2001 VII).
• EGMR, 29.04.2002 - 2346/02

  Vereinbarkeit der strafrechtlichen Verfolgung der Beihilfe zum Selbstmord mit der …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 12.06.2012 - 13624/03

  The Court reiterates that Article 3 of the Convention must be regarded as one of the most fundamental provisions of the Convention and as enshrining the core values of the democratic societies making up the Council of Europe (see Pretty v. the United Kingdom, no. 2346/02, § 49, ECHR 2002-III).
• EGMR, 22.10.2002 - 57984/00

  ANDRASIK AND OTHERS v. SLOVAKIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 12.06.2012 - 13624/03

  57984/00, 60237/00, 60242/00, 60679/00, 60680/00, 68563/01 and 60226/00, ECHR 2002-IX).

• EGMR, 07.10.2014 - 28490/02

  BEGHELURI AND OTHERS v. GEORGIA

  Lastly, even though the scope of the State's procedural obligations might differ between cases where treatment contrary to Article 3 has been inflicted through the involvement of State agents and cases where violence has been inflicted by private individuals, the requirements as to an official investigation are similar (see Denis Vasilyev v. Russia, no. 32704/04, § 100, 17 December 2009; Koky and Others v. Slovakia, no. 13624/03, § 215, 12 June 2012; and D.J. v. Croatia, no. 42418/10, § 85, 24 July 2012).
• EGMR, 23.10.2012 - 43606/04

  YOTOVA c. BULGARIE

  A cet égard, la Cour estime qu'il y a lieu de distinguer la présente affaire de l'affaire Koky et autres c. Slovaquie, no 13624/03, 12 juin 2012, où les indications de motivation raciste derrière les agissements violents d'un groupe de particuliers émanaient exclusivement des dépositions des victimes (voir paragraphes 31-61, 217 in fine et 224 de l'arrêt précité), ainsi que de l'affaire Mizigárová c. Slovaquie, no 74832/01, § 122, 14 décembre 2010, où les autorités ne disposaient d'aucune information concrèrte indiquant l'existence d'un éventuel motif raciste.
• EGMR, 03.07.2014 - 18114/06

  AMADAYEV v. RUSSIA

  As to the effective application of the existing legal framework once the ill-treatment has already occurred, even though the scope of the State's procedural obligations might differ between cases where treatment contrary to Article 3 has been inflicted through the involvement of State agents and cases where violence has been inflicted by private individuals, the requirements as to an official investigation are similar (see Denis Vasilyev v. Russia, no. 32704/04, § 100, 17 December 2009, and Koky and Others v. Slovakia, no. 13624/03, § 215, 12 June 2012).
• EGMR, 17.03.2015 - 2040/12

  CHINEZ v. ROMANIA

  Any deficiency in the investigation which undermines its ability to establish the cause of injuries or the identity of the persons responsible will risk falling foul of this standard (see Koky and Others v. Slovakia, no. 13624/03, § 215, 12 June 2012).