Rechtsprechung
EGMR, 12.06.2014 - 17504/07 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2014,12756) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
CHUPRIKOV v. RUSSIA
Art. 5, Art. 5 Abs. 1, Art. 5 Abs. 1 Buchst. c, Art. 5 Abs. 3, Art. 5 Abs. 4, Art. 5 Abs. 5 MRK
Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-1 - Lawful arrest or detention Article 5-1-c - Bringing before competent legal authority) Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-3 - Length of pre-trial detention) ...
Sonstiges (2)
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)
Chuprikov v. Russia
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)
[ENG]
Wird zitiert von ... (2)
- EGMR, 16.11.2021 - 42296/09
KOVROV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
The Court reiterates that Article 5 § 5 is complied with where it is possible to apply for compensation in respect of a deprivation of liberty effected in conditions contrary to paragraphs 1, 2, 3 or 4 of Article 5. The right to compensation set forth in paragraph 5 therefore presupposes that a violation of one of the preceding paragraphs of Article 5 has been established, either by a domestic authority or by the Court (see Stanev v. Bulgaria [GC], no. 36760/06, § 182, ECHR 2012; Abashev v. Russia, no. 9096/09, § 34, 27 June 2013; and Chuprikov v. Russia, no. 17504/07, §§ 94-95, 12 June 2014). - EGMR, 21.11.2017 - 1386/14
AMIZHAYEV v. RUSSIA
It further reiterates that, in the absence of an explicit and formal acknowledgement by the domestic court of the unlawful nature of the applicant's detention, a claim for compensation under Article 1070 of the Civil Code had no prospects of success and the applicant was not required to exhaust that remedy (see Chuprikov v. Russia, no. 17504/07, § 98, 12 June 2014).