Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 12.06.2014 - 30265/09 |
Volltextveröffentlichungen (2)
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
DONCEV AND BURGOV v. \
Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 6 Abs. 3, Art. 6 Abs. 3 Buchst. d, Art. 35 MRK
Remainder inadmissible No violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Criminal proceedings Article 6-1 - Fair hearing Equality of arms) No violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6-3 - Rights of defence Article 6-3-d - Examination of ... - Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
DONCEV AND BURGOV v. \
[MAC] Remainder inadmissible;No violation of Article 6+6-3-d - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Criminal proceedings;Article 6-1 - Fair hearing;Equality of arms) (Article 6 - Right to a fair trial;Article 6-3 - Rights of defence;Article 6-3-d - Examination of ...
Sonstiges (2)
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)
Doncev and Burgov v. "the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia"
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)
[ENG]
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (5)
- EGMR, 30.11.2000 - 52868/99
KWIATKOWSKA contre l'ITALIE
Auszug aus EGMR, 12.06.2014 - 30265/09
"77. In this respect the Court reiterates that neither the letter nor the spirit of Article 6 of the Convention prevents a person from waiving of his own free will, either expressly or tacitly, the entitlement to the guarantees of a fair trial (see Kwiatkowska v. Italy (dec.), no. 52868/99, 30 November 2000). - EGMR, 09.09.2003 - 30900/02
JONES v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
Auszug aus EGMR, 12.06.2014 - 30265/09
Before an accused can be said to have implicitly, through his conduct, waived an important right under Article 6, it must be shown that he could reasonably have foreseen what the consequences of his conduct would be (see Talat Tunç v. Turkey, no. 32432/96, 27 March 2007, § 59, and Jones v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 30900/02, 9 September 2003)". - EGMR, 10.04.2012 - 46099/06
ELLIS AND SIMMS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM AND MARTIN v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
Auszug aus EGMR, 12.06.2014 - 30265/09
The Court must therefore ascertain whether there were procedural safeguards to counterbalance the constraints with which the applicants were confronted in the exercise of their defence rights in relation to the driver's examination (see Al-Khawaja and Tahery v. the United Kingdom [GC], nos. 26766/05 and 22228/06, § 147, ECHR 2011; and Ellis and Simms v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 46099/06, § 78, 10 April 2012). - EGMR, 15.06.1992 - 12433/86
LÜDI v. SWITZERLAND
Auszug aus EGMR, 12.06.2014 - 30265/09
The police authorities had a legitimate interest to protect the identity of their agent so that they could make use of him again in the future (see Lüdi v. Switzerland, 15 June 1992, § 49, Series A no. 238; and Van Mechelen and Others, cited above, § 57). - EGMR, 20.11.1989 - 11454/85
KOSTOVSKI v. THE NETHERLANDS
Auszug aus EGMR, 12.06.2014 - 30265/09
Given that the driver was not regarded as an anonymous witness, it cannot be assumed that the nature and scope of the questions they could have put would have been devoid of purpose (see, by converse implication, Kostovski v. the Netherlands, 20 November 1989, § 42, Series A no. 166).