Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  MARIC v. CROATIA

  Art. 8, Art. 8 Abs. 1, Art. 8 Abs. 2, Art. 35, Art. 35 Abs. 1, Art. 41 MRK
  Preliminary objection dismissed (Article 35-1 - Exhaustion of domestic remedies) Remainder inadmissible Violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8-1 - Respect for family life Respect for private life) Non-pecuniary damage - ...

Kurzfassungen/Presse

• aerztezeitung.de (Pressemeldung)

  Totgeburten sind kein Klinikmüll

Sonstiges (2)

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  Maric v. Croatia

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  MARIC v. CROATIA

  Art. 8, Art. 8 Abs. 1 MRK
  [ENG]

Verfahrensgang

• EGMR, 12.06.2014 - 50132/12
• EGMR, 06.12.2018 - 50132/12

Wird zitiert von ... (0)Neu Zitiert selbst (11)

• EGMR, 30.10.2001 - 37794/97

  PANNULLO ET FORTE c. FRANCE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 12.06.2014 - 50132/12

  It has considered the "private life" aspect of Article 8 to be applicable to the question of whether a mother had the right to change the family name on the tombstone of her stillborn child (see Znamenskaya v. Russia, no. 77785/01, § 27, 2 June 2005), and also the excessive delay by the domestic authorities in returning the body of the applicants" child following an autopsy to be an interference with the private and family life of the applicants (see Pannullo and Forte v. France, no. 37794/97, § 36, ECHR 2001-X), just as the refusal of the investigative authorities to return the suspects body to his relatives (see Sabanchiyeva and Others v. Russia, no. 38450/05, § 123, ECHR 2013 (extracts)).
• EGMR, 22.12.2009 - 27996/06

  SEJDIC ET FINCI c. BOSNIE-HERZÉGOVINE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 12.06.2014 - 50132/12

  The Court will examine this issue of its own motion (see, mutatis mutandis, Sejdic and Finci v. Bosnia and Herzegovina [GC], nos. 27996/06 and 34836/06, § 27, ECHR 2009).
• EGMR, 06.06.2013 - 38450/05

  SABANCHIYEVA AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 12.06.2014 - 50132/12

  It has considered the "private life" aspect of Article 8 to be applicable to the question of whether a mother had the right to change the family name on the tombstone of her stillborn child (see Znamenskaya v. Russia, no. 77785/01, § 27, 2 June 2005), and also the excessive delay by the domestic authorities in returning the body of the applicants" child following an autopsy to be an interference with the private and family life of the applicants (see Pannullo and Forte v. France, no. 37794/97, § 36, ECHR 2001-X), just as the refusal of the investigative authorities to return the suspects body to his relatives (see Sabanchiyeva and Others v. Russia, no. 38450/05, § 123, ECHR 2013 (extracts)).

 
• EGMR, 02.06.2005 - 77785/01

  ZNAMENSKAYA v. RUSSIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 12.06.2014 - 50132/12

  It has considered the "private life" aspect of Article 8 to be applicable to the question of whether a mother had the right to change the family name on the tombstone of her stillborn child (see Znamenskaya v. Russia, no. 77785/01, § 27, 2 June 2005), and also the excessive delay by the domestic authorities in returning the body of the applicants" child following an autopsy to be an interference with the private and family life of the applicants (see Pannullo and Forte v. France, no. 37794/97, § 36, ECHR 2001-X), just as the refusal of the investigative authorities to return the suspects body to his relatives (see Sabanchiyeva and Others v. Russia, no. 38450/05, § 123, ECHR 2013 (extracts)).
• EGMR, 04.12.2008 - 30562/04

  S. und Marper ./. Vereinigtes Königreich

  Auszug aus EGMR, 12.06.2014 - 50132/12

  This indicates an issue of the lack of certainty and foreseeability of the relevant domestic law and raises a question whether the domestic law failed to afford adequate legal protection against possible arbitrariness as mandated by the requirement of lawfulness under Article 8 of the Convention (see S. and Marper v. the United Kingdom [GC], nos. 30562/04 and 30566/04, § 95, ECHR 2008).
• EGMR, 14.02.2008 - 55525/00

  HADRI-VIONNET c. SUISSE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 12.06.2014 - 50132/12

  The Court reiterates that the concepts of private and family life are broad terms not susceptible to exhaustive definition (see Hadri-Vionnet v. Switzerland, no. 55525/00, § 51, 14 February 2008).
• EGMR, 15.01.2009 - 33509/04

  BURDOV v. RUSSIA (No. 2)

  Auszug aus EGMR, 12.06.2014 - 50132/12

  Redress so afforded must be appropriate and sufficient, failing which a party can continue to claim to be a victim of the violation (see, among others, Burdov v. Russia (no. 2), no. 33509/04, §§ 54-56, ECHR 2009, with further references).
• EGMR, 11.09.2002 - 57220/00

  MIFSUD contre la FRANCE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 12.06.2014 - 50132/12

  The purpose of Article 35 is to afford the Contracting States the opportunity of preventing or putting right the violations alleged against them before those allegations are submitted to the Court (see, for example, Mifsud v. France (dec.) [GC], no. 57220/00, § 15, ECHR 2002-VIII).
• EGMR, 11.09.2007 - 25327/02

  YILDIRIM v. TURKEY

  Auszug aus EGMR, 12.06.2014 - 50132/12

  The Court has also considered that a mother being unable to carry out her religious duties on the grave of her stillborn child raises an issue under the concept of "family life" under Article 8 (see Yıldırım v. Turkey (dec.), 25327/02, 11 September 2007).
• EGMR, 09.03.2004 - 61827/00

  GLASS c. ROYAUME-UNI

  Auszug aus EGMR, 12.06.2014 - 50132/12

  The Court notes that it has not been contested that the hospital was a public institution and that the acts and omissions of its medical staff were capable of engaging the responsibility of the respondent State under the Convention (see Glass v. the United Kingdom, no. 61827/00, § 71, ECHR 2004-II).
• EGMR, 20.07.2004 - 47940/99

  BALOGH v. HUNGARY