Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  ROCHE v. MALTA

  Inadmissible (englisch)

Wird zitiert von ...Neu Zitiert selbst (6)

• EGMR, 02.02.2016 - 71776/12

  N.TS. AND OTHERS v. GEORGIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 12.06.2018 - 42825/17

  Other relevant international material can be found in N.Ts. and Others v. Georgia (no. 71776/12, §§ 40-44, 2 February 2016).

  The same principles are enshrined in Article 12 of the CRC and in other relevant international instruments (see paragraph 81 above, and N.Ts. and Others v. Georgia, no. 71776/12, § 72, 2 February 2016, and the references therein).

• EGMR, 27.09.2011 - 32250/08

  DIAMANTE AND PELLICCIONI v. SAN MARINO

  Auszug aus EGMR, 12.06.2018 - 42825/17

  In this light, the decision-making process leading to measures of interference must be fair and such as to afford due respect to the interests safeguarded by Article 8 (see Iosub Caras v. Romania, no. 7198/04, § 48, 27 July 2006; and Diamante and Pelliccioni v. San Marino, no. 32250/08, § 150, 27 September 2011).
• EGMR, 29.04.2014 - 60092/12

  Z.J. v. LITHUANIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 12.06.2018 - 42825/17

  Lastly, the Court notes that, whilst Article 8 contains no explicit procedural requirements, the applicant must be involved in the decision-making process, seen as a whole, to a degree sufficient to provide him or her with the requisite protection of his interests, as safeguarded by that Article (see Fernández Martínez v. Spain [GC], no. 56030/07, § 147, ECHR 2014 (extracts); Z.J. v. Lithuania, no. 60092/12, § 100, 29 April 2014; Elsholz v. Germany [GC], no. 25735/94, § 52, ECHR 2000-VIII; and W. v. the United Kingdom, 8 July 1987, § 64, Series A no. 121).

 
• EGMR, 03.09.2015 - 10161/13

  M. AND M. v. CROATIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 12.06.2018 - 42825/17

  In the case of children, the above principle is exercised through their right to be consulted and heard (see M. and M. v. Croatia, no. 10161/13, §§ 180-181, 3 September 2015).
• EGMR, 25.01.2011 - 18830/07

  PLAZA v. POLAND

  Auszug aus EGMR, 12.06.2018 - 42825/17

  The Court has already held that as children mature and, with the passage of time, become able to formulate their own opinions on their contact with their parents, for instance, the courts should give due weight to their views and feelings as well as to their right to respect for their private life (see Plaza v. Poland, no. 18830/07, § 71, 25 January 2011).
• EGMR, 20.03.2018 - 37685/10

  RADOMILJA AND OTHERS v. CROATIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 12.06.2018 - 42825/17

  The Court reiterates that it is the master of the characterisation to be given in law to the facts of a case (see Radomilja and Others v. Croatia [GC], nos. 37685/10 and 22768/12, §§ 114-115, ECHR 2018).

• EGMR, 01.03.2022 - 19090/20

  FENECH v. MALTA

  42825/17 and 66857/17, § 102, 12 June 2018, and, in practice, Cutajar v. Malta (Committee dec.), no. 55775/13, 23 June 2015) -the Court considers that at this point in time this part of the complaint under Article 3 must be declared inadmissible, in accordance with Article 35 §§ 1 and 4 of the Convention for non-exhaustion of domestic remedies, and thus cannot form part of the scope of the applicant's complaint under Article 3.