Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  SZÉKELY v. HUNGARY

  Inadmissible (englisch)

Wird zitiert von ...Neu Zitiert selbst (3)

• EGMR, 25.09.2007 - 42165/02

  HADRABOVA v. THE CZECH REPUBLIC

  Auszug aus EGMR, 12.06.2018 - 59441/13

  42165/02 and 466/03, 25 September 2007; Predescu v. Romania, no. 21447/03, §§ 25-27, 2 December 2008; see also Gatto v. Italy, (dec.) no. 19424/08, § 29, 8 March 2016, and the authorities cited therein).
• EGMR, 02.12.2008 - 21447/03

  PREDESCU c. ROUMANIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 12.06.2018 - 59441/13

  42165/02 and 466/03, 25 September 2007; Predescu v. Romania, no. 21447/03, §§ 25-27, 2 December 2008; see also Gatto v. Italy, (dec.) no. 19424/08, § 29, 8 March 2016, and the authorities cited therein).
• EGMR, 08.03.2016 - 19424/08

  GATTO c. ITALIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 12.06.2018 - 59441/13

  42165/02 and 466/03, 25 September 2007; Predescu v. Romania, no. 21447/03, §§ 25-27, 2 December 2008; see also Gatto v. Italy, (dec.) no. 19424/08, § 29, 8 March 2016, and the authorities cited therein).

• EGMR, 16.06.2020 - 2714/11

  SEVRUK v. UKRAINE

  The Court also notes that where important developments occur during proceedings pending before it and, despite the obligation prescribed in the Rules of Court, an applicant fails to inform the Court thereof, thus preventing it from determining the case in full knowledge of the facts, the application may be dismissed for abuse of the right of individual application (see for a recent example Székely v. Hungary (dec.), [Committee], no. 59441/13, § 12, 12 June 2018 and the authorities cited therein).