Rechtsprechung
EGMR, 12.07.2005 - 36220/97 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2005,44681) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichungen (2)
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
OKYAY AND OTHERS v. TURKEY
Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 41, Art. 53 MRK
Violation of Art. 6-1 Non-pecuniary damage - financial award (englisch) - Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
OKYAY ET AUTRES c. TURQUIE
Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 41, Art. 53 MRK
Violation de l'art. 6-1 Préjudice moral - réparation pécuniaire (französisch)
Verfahrensgang
- EGMR, 17.01.2002 - 36220/97
- EGMR, 12.07.2005 - 36220/97
Wird zitiert von ... (8) Neu Zitiert selbst (3)
- EGMR, 06.04.2000 - 27644/95
ATHANASSOGLOU ET AUTRES c. SUISSE
Auszug aus EGMR, 12.07.2005 - 36220/97
Renvoyant au raisonnement de la Cour dans les affaires Balmer-Schafroth et autres c. Suisse (arrêt du 26 août 1997, Recueil des arrêts et décisions 1997-IV, p. 1359, § 40) et Athanassoglou et autres c. Suisse ([GC], no 27644/95, § 55, CEDH 2000-IV), ainsi que Ünver c. Turquie ((déc.), no 36209/97, 26 septembre 2000), il affirme qu'il n'y avait aucun lien entre les conditions d'exploitation litigieuses des centrales et la violation alléguée des droits de caractère civil des requérants. - EGMR, 26.09.2000 - 36209/97
ÜNVER v. TURKEY
Auszug aus EGMR, 12.07.2005 - 36220/97
Renvoyant au raisonnement de la Cour dans les affaires Balmer-Schafroth et autres c. Suisse (arrêt du 26 août 1997, Recueil des arrêts et décisions 1997-IV, p. 1359, § 40) et Athanassoglou et autres c. Suisse ([GC], no 27644/95, § 55, CEDH 2000-IV), ainsi que Ünver c. Turquie ((déc.), no 36209/97, 26 septembre 2000), il affirme qu'il n'y avait aucun lien entre les conditions d'exploitation litigieuses des centrales et la violation alléguée des droits de caractère civil des requérants. - VerfG Brandenburg, 25.08.2010 - VfGBbg 11/10
Ablehnung des Antrags auf Erlass einer eA die darauf gerichtet ist, Träger …
Auszug aus EGMR, 12.07.2005 - 36220/97
12/10/2005.
- EGMR, 15.10.2009 - 17056/06
MICALLEF v. MALTA
En outre, la notion de «droit de caractère civil» figurant à l'article 6 § 1 ne saurait être interprétée comme restreignant un droit exécutoire en droit interne au sens de l'article 53 de la Convention (Okyay et autres c. Turquie, no 36220/97, § 68, CEDH 2005-VII). - Generalanwalt beim EuGH, 30.04.2019 - C-556/17
Torubarov - Vorlage zur Vorabentscheidung - Raum der Freiheit, der Sicherheit und …
32 EGMR, Urteile vom 11. Januar 2018, Sharxhi u. a./Albanien (CE:ECHR:2018:0111JUD001061316, §§ 92 bis 93), unter Anführung des Urteils vom 12. Juli 2005, 0kyay u. a./Türkei (CE:ECHR:2005:0712JUD003622097, § 72). - EGMR, 21.07.2015 - 31833/06
CINGILLI HOLDING A.S. AND CINGILLIOGLU v. TURKEY
By way of example, such cases have related to failure to: pay a debt or compensation (Burdov v. Russia, no. 59498/00, §§ 36-38, ECHR 2002-III; Timofeyev v. Russia, no. 58263/00, §§ 40-43, 23 October 2003; Metaxas v. Greece, no. 8415/02, §§ 25-26, 27 May 2004; and Simaldone v. Italy, no. 22644/03, §§ 48-56, 31 March 2009); comply with the annulment of an expropriation order (Katsaros v. Greece, no. 51473/99, §§ 33-35, 6 June 2002); restore property or pay compensation (Jasiuniene v. Lithuania, no. 41510/98, §§ 28-32, 6 March 2003, and Sabin Popescu v. Romania, no. 48102/99, §§ 68-76, 2 March 2004); demolish buildings (Kyrtatos v. Greece, no. 41666/98, §§ 31-32, ECHR 2003-VI (extracts), and Ruianu v. Romania, no. 34647/97, §§ 65-73, 17 June 2003); evict persons from a building (Prodan v. Moldova, no. 49806/99, §§ 50-56, ECHR 2004-III (extracts)); grant access to public documents (Kenedi v. Hungary, no. 31475/05, §§ 35-39, 26 May 2009); bring industrial and other activities to an end (Taskin and Others v. Turkey, no. 46117/99, §§ 135-138, ECHR 2004-X, and Okyay and Others v. Turkey, no. 36220/97, §§ 72-74, ECHR 2005-VII); employ a person (Castren-Niniou v. Greece, no. 43837/02, §§ 25-28, 9 June 2005); and hand over adopted children to their parents (Pini and Others v. Romania, nos. 78028/01 and 78030/01, §§ 174-189, ECHR 2004-V (extracts)).
- EGMR, 02.12.2010 - 12853/03
IVAN ATANASOV v. BULGARIA
In Okyay and Others, the Court made similar findings, and regarded the fact that the domestic courts had ruled in the applicants' favour on the merits as decisive (see Okyay and Others v. Turkey, no. 36220/97, §§ 65-68, ECHR 2005-VII). - EGMR, 04.02.2020 - 44837/07
ÇIÇEK AND OTHERS v. TURKEY
Relevant domestic law 11. A description of the relevant law with respect to the right to living in a healthy environment and the duty of the domestic authorities to enforce court judgments can be found in Okyay and Others v. Turkey (no. 36220/97, §§ 46, 50 and 57-59, ECHR 2005-VII). - EGMR, 11.10.2022 - 81415/12
ÇÖÇELLI AND OTHERS v. TÜRKIYE
It therefore follows that the outcome of the impugned proceedings related to the applicants" "civil rights" (see Taskin and Others v. Turkey, no. 46117/99, §§ 130-34, ECHR 2004-X; Okyay and Others v. Turkey, no. 36220/97, §§ 65-68, ECHR 2005-VII; and Bursa Barosu Baskanligi and Others, cited above, §§ 126-28 for similar conclusions in cases against Türkiye where the challenges to EIA reports by the applicants were considered by the Court to have related to "civil rights and obligations" within the meaning of Article 6 § 1 of the Convention). - EGMR, 22.10.2019 - 59738/10
KAYA c. TURQUIE
« The Government hereby wish to express by the way of unilateral declaration that the national authorities" failure to fully comply with the judgement of the Supreme Military Administrative Court breached applicant's right to a fair trial in the light of the well-established case-law of Okyay and Others/Turkey no. 36220/97, 12 July 2005; Lemke/Turkey, no. 17381/02, 5 June 2007; Liman-I?Ÿ Sendikasi/Turkey, no. 29608/05, 36239/05 ve [sic] 36247/05, 12 October 2010; and Nurten Yavuz/Turkey, no. 14295/05, 20 May 2010. - EGMR, 02.04.2019 - 26660/05
NOYANALPAN AND OTHERS v. TURKEY
A description of the relevant law with respect to the right to living in a healthy environment and the duty of domestic authorities to enforce court judgments can be found in Okyay and Others v. Turkey (no. 36220/97, §§ 46, 50 and 57-59, ECHR 2005-VII).