Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 12.09.2006 - 74258/01 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2006,54266) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
URBARSKA OBEC TRENCIANSKE BISKUPICE v. SLOVAKIA
Art. 34, Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1, Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1 Abs. 1, Art. 35, Art. 35 Abs. 1, Art. 35 Abs. 3 MRK
Partly admissible Partly inadmissible (englisch)
Verfahrensgang
- EGMR, 12.09.2006 - 74258/01
- EGMR, 27.11.2007 - 74258/01
- EGMR, 27.01.2009 - 74258/01
- EGMR, 07.05.2013 - 74258/01
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (1)
- EGMR, 23.09.1982 - 7151/75
SPORRONG ET LÖNNROTH c. SUÈDE
Auszug aus EGMR, 12.09.2006 - 74258/01
Thirty-five Members of Parliament and the Prosecutor General brought proceedings before the Constitutional Court claiming that several provisions of Act 64/1997 were contrary to the Constitution and Article 1 of Protocol No. 1. In particular, the Members of Parliament relied on the Court's case-law (James and Others v. the United Kingdom, judgment of 21 February 1986, Series A no. 98, § 54; Sporrong and Lönnroth v. Sweden, judgment of 23 September 1982, Series A no. 52, §§ 69 and 73) and argued that there existed no genuine public interest for the interference with the land owners" rights and that the compensation which the land owners were to receive under the relevant provisions of Act 64/1997 was not appropriate.