Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 12.09.2017 - 46820/09 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2017,33248) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
KARATAS AND OTHERS v. TURKEY
Violation of Article 2 - Right to life (Article 2-1 - Life) (Substantive aspect) (englisch)
Verfahrensgang
- EGMR, 21.09.2010 - 46820/09
- EGMR, 12.09.2017 - 46820/09
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (5)
- EGMR, 02.08.2005 - 65899/01
TANIS ET AUTRES c. TURQUIE
Auszug aus EGMR, 12.09.2017 - 46820/09
In these circumstances, a direct causal link has been established between the violation of Article 2 and those three applicants" loss of the financial support provided by Bülent Karatas (see Özcan and Others, cited above, §§ 85-87; see also Tanis and Others v. Turkey, no. 65899/01, § 231, ECHR 2005-VIII). - EGMR, 27.09.1995 - 18984/91
McCANN AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
Auszug aus EGMR, 12.09.2017 - 46820/09
In particular, the force used must be strictly proportionate to the achievement of the aims set out in the subparagraphs of the Article (see McCann and Others v. the United Kingdom, 27 September 1995, §§ 148-149, Series A no. 324). - EGMR, 20.12.2004 - 50385/99
MAKARATZIS c. GRECE
Auszug aus EGMR, 12.09.2017 - 46820/09
In any event, the Court considers that the tenth applicant's fortuitous survival does not prevent it from examining the complaint under Article 2 of the Convention, since the use of force against him and the ensuing injury were potentially fatal and put his life at risk (see, mutatis mutandis, Makaratzis v. Greece [GC], no. 50385/99, §§ 52 and 55, ECHR 2004-XI, and Peker v. Turkey (no. 2), no. 42136/06, §§ 41-42, 12 April 2011 and the cases cited therein). - EGMR, 13.06.1994 - 10588/83
BARBERÀ, MESSEGUÉ AND JABARDO v. SPAIN (ARTICLE 50)
Auszug aus EGMR, 12.09.2017 - 46820/09
As regards the first nine applicants" claim for pecuniary damage, the Court's case-law has established that there must be a clear causal connection between the damage claimed by the applicant and the violation of the Convention and that this may, in appropriate cases, include compensation in respect of loss of earnings (see, among other authorities, Barberà, Messegué and Jabardo v. Spain (Article 50), 13 June 1994, §§ 16-20, Series A no. 285-C). - EGMR, 12.04.2011 - 42136/06
PEKER v. TURKEY (No. 2)
Auszug aus EGMR, 12.09.2017 - 46820/09
In any event, the Court considers that the tenth applicant's fortuitous survival does not prevent it from examining the complaint under Article 2 of the Convention, since the use of force against him and the ensuing injury were potentially fatal and put his life at risk (see, mutatis mutandis, Makaratzis v. Greece [GC], no. 50385/99, §§ 52 and 55, ECHR 2004-XI, and Peker v. Turkey (no. 2), no. 42136/06, §§ 41-42, 12 April 2011 and the cases cited therein).