Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  TIMCIUC v. ROMANIA

  Art. 2, Art. 5, Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 8, Art. 10, Art. 10 Abs. 2, Art. 13, Art. 14 MRK
  Inadmissible (englisch)

Wird zitiert von ... (25)Neu Zitiert selbst (8)

• EGMR, 19.12.2006 - 62202/00

  RADIO TWIST A.S. v. SLOVAKIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 12.10.2010 - 28999/03

  In any case, it fails to see any negative consequence that the applicant might have suffered after the publication of those articles (see, mutatis mutandis, Grinberg v. Russia, no. 23472/03, § 33, 21 July 2005, and Radio Twist, A.S. v. Slovakia, no. 62202/00, § 61, ECHR 2006-XV).
• EGMR, 22.10.2007 - 21279/02

  LINDON, OTCHAKOVSKY-LAURENS ET JULY c. FRANCE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 12.10.2010 - 28999/03

  The Court concurs with the domestic courts' reasoning that journalistic freedom also covers possible recourse to a degree of exaggeration, or even provocation (see Lindon, Otchakovsky-Laurens and July v. France [GC], nos. 21279/02 and 36448/02, § 56, ECHR 2007-XI).
• EGMR, 04.02.2003 - 61164/00

  DURINGER et AUTRES et GRUNGE contre la FRANCE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 12.10.2010 - 28999/03

  61164/00 and 18589/02, ECHR 2003-II (extracts), where the persistent use of insulting or provocative language by an applicant furnished grounds for striking a case out for abuse of the right of petition).

 
• EGMR, 21.01.1999 - 30544/96

  GARCÍA RUIZ v. SPAIN

  Auszug aus EGMR, 12.10.2010 - 28999/03

  However, the Court reiterates that admissibility and assessment of evidence are primarily matters for regulation by national law and the national courts, and therefore it is not its function to deal with errors of fact or law allegedly committed by a national court unless and in so far as they may have infringed rights and freedoms protected by the Convention (see García Ruiz v. Spain [GC], no. 30544/96, § 28, ECHR 1999-I).
• EGMR, 06.02.2001 - 41205/98

  TAMMER v. ESTONIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 12.10.2010 - 28999/03

  The Court recalls that in cases like the present one, it has always stressed the contribution made by photos or articles in the press to a debate of general interest (see, in particular Von Hannover v. Germany, no. 59320/00, § 60, ECHR 2004-VI; Tammer v. Estonia, no. 41205/98, § 68, ECHR 2001-I).
• EGMR, 09.04.2009 - 28070/06

  A. v. NORWAY

  Auszug aus EGMR, 12.10.2010 - 28999/03

  At the outset the Court notes that the conclusion reached above, under Article 6 § 1, does not prevent it from taking into account the interests sought to be protected by Article 6 in the balancing exercise carried out below under Article 8, without, nevertheless, substituting its own assessment for that of the domestic courts (see Mamère v. France, no. 12697/03, § 22, ECHR 2006-XIII, and A. v. Norway, no. 28070/06, § 47, 9 April 2009).
• EGMR, 25.06.1992 - 13778/88

  THORGEIR THORGEIRSON v. ICELAND

  Auszug aus EGMR, 12.10.2010 - 28999/03

  The Court reiterates that the existence of impartiality for the purposes of Article 6 § 1 must be determined according to a subjective test, that is, on the basis of the personal conviction of a particular judge in a given case, and also according to an objective test, that is, ascertaining whether the judge offered guarantees sufficient to exclude any legitimate doubt in this respect (Thorgeir Thorgeirson v. Iceland, 25 June 1992, § 49, Series A no. 239).
• EGMR, 17.09.2009 - 10249/03

  Rückwirkende Strafschärfung und Anerkennung des Meistbegünstigungsprinzips als …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 12.10.2010 - 28999/03

  It reiterates that it is master of the characterisation to be given in law to the facts (see Scoppola v. Italy (no. 2) [GC], no. 10249/03, § 54, ECHR 2009-...).

• EGMR, 02.02.2016 - 22947/13

  News-Portal: Keine Haftung für Nutzerkommentare

  40660/08 and 60641/08, § 106, ECHR 2012, with further references to the cases of Hachette Filipacchi Associés, cited above, § 41; Timciuc v. Romania (dec.), no. 28999/03, § 144, 12 October 2010; and Mosley v. the United Kingdom, no. 48009/08, § 111, 10 May 2011).
• EGMR, 07.12.2021 - 39378/15

  Kritik in Online-Forum: Menschengerichtshof stärkt Anonymität im Netz

  40660/08 and 60641/08, § 106, ECHR 2012, with further references to Hachette Filipacchi Associés (ICI PARIS), no. 12268/03, § 41, 23 July 2009; Timciuc v. Romania (dec.), no. 28999/03, § 144, 12 October 2010; and Mosley v. the United Kingdom, no. 48009/08, § 111, 10 May 2011).
• EGMR, 15.03.2012 - 4149/04

  AKSU c. TURQUIE

  Thus, in such cases the Court will need to balance the applicant's right to "respect for his private life" against the public interest in protecting freedom of expression, bearing in mind that no hierarchical relationship exists between the rights guaranteed by the two Articles (see Timciuc v. Romania (dec.) no. 28999/03, § 144, 12 October 2010).

 
• EGMR, 19.03.2019 - 43624/14

  HØINESS v. NORWAY

  40660/08 and 60641/08, § 106, ECHR 2012, with further references to the cases of Hachette Filipacchi Associés, cited above, § 41; Timciuc v. Romania (dec.), no. 28999/03, § 144, 12 October 2010; and Mosley v. the United Kingdom, no. 48009/08, § 111, 10 May 2011).
• EGMR, 07.02.2017 - 74742/14

  PIHL v. SWEDEN

  40660/08 and 60641/08, § 106, ECHR 2012, with further references to the cases of Hachette Filipacchi Associés, cited above, § 41; Timciuc v. Romania (dec.), no. 28999/03, § 144, 12 October 2010; and Mosley v. the United Kingdom, no. 48009/08, § 111, 10 May 2011).
• EGMR, 08.12.2015 - 51/06

  CARAGEA v. ROMANIA

  The relevant provisions of the Civil and Criminal Codes concerning insult and defamation and liability for paying damages, in force at the material time, as well as the subsequent amendments to them, are described in CumpÇ?nÇ? and MazÇ?re v. Romania ([GC], no. 33348/96, §§ 55-56, ECHR 2004-XI and Timciuc v. Romania ((dec.), no. 28999/03, §§ 95-97, 12 October 2010).

  Furthermore, the Court observes that the article commented on the applicant's activity as a manager and tangentially on his involvement with the justice system, but made no specific reference to any aspect of the applicant's private life as such (see, mutandis mutandis, Timciuc v. Romania (dec.), no. 28999/03, § 147, 12 October 2010).

• EGMR, 22.03.2016 - 48718/11

  PINTO COELHO c. PORTUGAL (N° 2)

  En effet, ces droits méritent a priori un égal respect (Hachette Filipacchi Associés (ICI PARIS) c. France, no 12268/03, § 41, 23 juillet 2009, Timciuc c. Roumanie (déc.), no 28999/03, § 144, 12 octobre 2010, et Mosley c. Royaume-Uni, no 48009/08, § 111, 10 mai 2011, Haldimann et autres, précité, § 54, Von Hannover c. Allemagne (no 2) [GC], nos 40660/08 et 60641/08, § 106, CEDH 2012, et Axel Springer AG c. Allemagne [GC], no 39954/08, § 87, 7 février 2012).
• EGMR, 09.07.2013 - 51160/06

  DI GIOVANNI c. ITALIE

  En effet, ces droits méritent a priori un égal respect (Hachette Filipacchi Associés (ICI PARIS) c. France, no 12268/03, § 41, 23 juillet 2009 ; Timciuc c. Roumanie (déc.), no 28999/03, § 144, 12 octobre 2010 ; et Mosley c. Royaume-Uni, no 48009/08, § 111, 10 mai 2011).
• EGMR, 07.03.2023 - 14852/18

  TÜZÜNATAÇ c. TÜRKIYE

  En effet, ces droits méritent a priori un égal respect (Hachette Filipacchi Associés (ICI PARIS), précité, § 41, Timciuc c. Roumanie (déc.), no 28999/03, § 144, 12 octobre 2010, Mosley, précité, § 111, et Couderc et Hachette Filipacchi Associés, précité, § 91).
• EGMR, 13.02.2018 - 61949/08

  SEFERI YILMAZ c. TURQUIE

  En effet, ces droits méritent a priori un égal respect (Hachette Filipacchi Associés (ICI PARIS) c. France, no 12268/03, § 41, 23 juillet 2009, Timciuc c. Roumanie (déc.), no 28999/03, § 144, 12 octobre 2010, Mosley c. Royaume-Uni, no 48009/08, § 111, 10 mai 2011, et Couderc et Hachette Filipacchi Associés, précité, § 91).
• EGMR, 30.10.2018 - 1759/08

  KABOGLU ET ORAN c. TURQUIE
• EGMR, 08.09.2020 - 22649/08

  OOO REGNUM v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 04.06.2020 - 31955/11

  JEZIOR c. POLOGNE
• EGMR, 30.08.2016 - 55442/12

  MEDIPRESS-SOCIEDADE JORNALÍSTICA, LDA c. PORTUGAL
• EGMR, 15.06.2021 - 19165/19

  ÖMÜR ÇAGDAS ERSOY c. TURQUIE
• EGMR, 19.06.2012 - 3490/03

  TANASOAICA c. ROUMANIE
• EGMR, 13.10.2015 - 37428/06

  BREMNER c. TURQUIE
• EGMR, 02.02.2021 - 25200/11

  DICKINSON c. TURQUIE
• EGMR, 12.03.2015 - 25790/11

  ALMEIDA LEITÃO BENTO FERNANDES c. PORTUGAL
• EGMR, 20.10.2020 - 36944/07

  KABOGLU ET ORAN c. TURQUIE (N° 2)
• EGMR, 08.03.2016 - 25721/04

  RUSU v. ROMANIA
• EGMR, 07.12.2021 - 44332/16

  DANES ET AUTRES c. ROUMANIE
• EGMR, 07.09.2021 - 45016/18

  ÇAKMAK c. TURQUIE
• EGMR, 10.02.2015 - 32104/06

  COJOCARU v. ROMANIA
• EGMR, 04.10.2011 - 15960/05

  NEGREA v. ROMANIA