Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 12.11.2002 - 47227/99 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2002,38356) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
BAKOVA v. SLOVAKIA
Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 41 MRK
Violation of Art. 6-1 Pecuniary damage - claim dismissed Non-pecuniary damage - financial award Costs and expenses partial award - domestic proceedings (englisch)
Verfahrensgang
- EGMR, 26.03.2002 - 47227/99
- EGMR, 12.11.2002 - 47227/99
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (2)
- EGMR, 21.02.1990 - 11855/85
H?KANSSON AND STURESSON v. SWEDEN
Auszug aus EGMR, 12.11.2002 - 47227/99
In the present case the applicant was in principle entitled to a public hearing as none of the exceptions laid down in the second sentence of Article 6 § 1 applied (see Håkansson and Sturesson v. Sweden, judgment of 21 February 1990, Series A no. 171-A, p. 20, § 64). - EGMR, 26.09.1995 - 18160/91
DIENNET v. FRANCE
Auszug aus EGMR, 12.11.2002 - 47227/99
By rendering the administration of justice transparent, publicity contributes to the achievement of the aim of Article 6 § 1, namely a fair trial, the guarantee of which is one of the fundamental principles of any democratic society, within the meaning of the Convention (see, for example, Diennet v. France, judgment of 26 September 1995, Series A no. 325-A, pp. 14-15, § 33 and Malhous v. the Czech Republic [GC], no. 33071/96, § 55, 12 July 2001).