Volltextveröffentlichungen (2)

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  TOTH c. AUTRICHE

  Art. 5, Art. 5 Abs. 3, Art. 5 Abs. 4, Art. 35, Art. 35 Abs. 1, Art. 41 MRK
  Violation de l'Art. 5-3 Exception préliminaire rejetée (délai de six mois) Violation de l'Art. 5-4 Dommage matériel - demande rejetée Préjudice moral - constat de violation suffisant Remboursement partiel frais et dépens - procédure nationale ...

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  TOTH v. AUSTRIA

  Art. 5, Art. 5 Abs. 3, Art. 5 Abs. 4, Art. 35, Art. 35 Abs. 1, Art. 41 MRK
  Violation of Art. 5-3 Preliminary objection rejected (six month period) Violation of Art. 5-4 Pecuniary damage - claim dismissed Non-pecuniary damage - finding of violation sufficient Costs and expenses partial award - domestic proceedings ...

Verfahrensgang

• EKMR, 08.05.1989 - 11894/85
• EGMR, 12.12.1991 - 11894/85

Wird zitiert von ... (0)Neu Zitiert selbst (11)

• EGMR, 21.10.1986 - 9862/82

  SANCHEZ-REISSE c. SUISSE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 12.12.1991 - 11894/85

  As the proceedings did not ensure equal treatment, they were not truly adversarial (see, mutatis mutandis, the Sanchez-Reisse judgment of 21 October 1986, Series A no. 107, p. 19, para. 51).

  4 (art. 5-4) requires that it be possible to apply to a judge, who can decide on the application for release following a judicial type procedure, with the essential procedural guarantees inherent in that notion (see the judgments of Neumeister of 27 June 1968, Series A no. 8, p. 43, para. 24; Sanchez-Reisse of 21 October 1986, Series A no. 107, p. 19, para. 51; and Lamy of 30 March 1989, Series A no. 151, pp. 16-17, para. 29); however, that is clearly below the level of protection afforded - and required - by Article 6 para.

• EGMR, 28.08.1991 - 11170/84

  Brandstetter ./. Österreich

  Auszug aus EGMR, 12.12.1991 - 11894/85

  Furthermore, where the appeal (against a decision by the Ratskammer to release a detainee) has been lodged by the prosecuting authority, the detainee too has the possibility of putting forward his submissions provided that the prosecution submissions have been sufficiently brought to his notice - as the Court correctly noted in the Brandstetter judgment of 28 August 1991, Series A no. 211, pp.
• EGMR, 06.11.1980 - 7367/76

  GUZZARDI v. ITALY

  Auszug aus EGMR, 12.12.1991 - 11894/85

  In the light of its own case-law (see, in particular, the Ringeisen judgment of 16 July 1971 Series A no. 13, pp. 37-38, para. 90, the Guzzardi judgment of 6 November 1980, Series A no. 39, pp. 22-23, paras. 62-63, and the Foti and Others judgment of 10 December 1982, Series A no. 56, p. 15, para. 44) and of all the evidence, the Court agrees with this conclusion.

 
• EGMR, 28.06.1978 - 6232/73

  König ./. Deutschland

  Auszug aus EGMR, 12.12.1991 - 11894/85

  Preferred to the use of copies, which is the practice in other member States of the Council of Europe, such toing and froing of the file occurred both before the indictment and after it (see, mutatis mutandis, the König judgment of 28 June 1978, Series A no. 27, p. 36, para. 104).
• EGMR, 16.07.1971 - 2614/65

  RINGEISEN v. AUSTRIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 12.12.1991 - 11894/85

  In the light of its own case-law (see, in particular, the Ringeisen judgment of 16 July 1971 Series A no. 13, pp. 37-38, para. 90, the Guzzardi judgment of 6 November 1980, Series A no. 39, pp. 22-23, paras. 62-63, and the Foti and Others judgment of 10 December 1982, Series A no. 56, p. 15, para. 44) and of all the evidence, the Court agrees with this conclusion.
• EGMR, 17.01.1970 - 2689/65

  DELCOURT c. BELGIQUE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 12.12.1991 - 11894/85

  Nevertheless, a State which institutes such a system must in principle accord to the detainees the same guarantees on appeal as at first instance (see, inter alia, mutatis mutandis, the Delcourt judgment of 17 January 1970, Series A no. 11, p. 14, para. 25 in fine, and the Ekbatani judgment of 26 May 1988, Series A no. 134, p. 12, para. 24).
• EGMR, 27.06.1968 - 1936/63

  Neumeister ./. Österreich

  Auszug aus EGMR, 12.12.1991 - 11894/85

  4 (art. 5-4) requires that it be possible to apply to a judge, who can decide on the application for release following a judicial type procedure, with the essential procedural guarantees inherent in that notion (see the judgments of Neumeister of 27 June 1968, Series A no. 8, p. 43, para. 24; Sanchez-Reisse of 21 October 1986, Series A no. 107, p. 19, para. 51; and Lamy of 30 March 1989, Series A no. 151, pp. 16-17, para. 29); however, that is clearly below the level of protection afforded - and required - by Article 6 para.
• EGMR, 27.06.1968 - 2122/64

  Wemhoff ./. Deutschland

  Auszug aus EGMR, 12.12.1991 - 11894/85

  The Court fully appreciates that the right of an accused in detention to have his case examined with particular expedition must not unduly hinder the efforts of the judicial authorities to carry out their tasks with proper care (see, mutatis mutandis, the Wemhoff judgment of 27 June 1968, Series A no. 7, p. 26, para. 17).
• EGMR, 10.12.1982 - 7604/76

  FOTI ET AUTRES c. ITALIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 12.12.1991 - 11894/85

  In the light of its own case-law (see, in particular, the Ringeisen judgment of 16 July 1971 Series A no. 13, pp. 37-38, para. 90, the Guzzardi judgment of 6 November 1980, Series A no. 39, pp. 22-23, paras. 62-63, and the Foti and Others judgment of 10 December 1982, Series A no. 56, p. 15, para. 44) and of all the evidence, the Court agrees with this conclusion.
• EGMR, 30.03.1989 - 10444/83

  LAMY c. BELGIQUE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 12.12.1991 - 11894/85

  4 (art. 5-4) requires that it be possible to apply to a judge, who can decide on the application for release following a judicial type procedure, with the essential procedural guarantees inherent in that notion (see the judgments of Neumeister of 27 June 1968, Series A no. 8, p. 43, para. 24; Sanchez-Reisse of 21 October 1986, Series A no. 107, p. 19, para. 51; and Lamy of 30 March 1989, Series A no. 151, pp. 16-17, para. 29); however, that is clearly below the level of protection afforded - and required - by Article 6 para.
• EGMR, 28.03.1990 - 11968/86

  B. ./. Österreich