Rechtsprechung
EGMR, 12.12.2000 - 45424/99 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2000,43263) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
TRUHLI v. CROATIA
Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1, Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1 Abs. 1, Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1 MRK
Partly admissible Partly inadmissible (englisch)
Verfahrensgang
- EGMR, 02.03.2000 - 45424/99
- EGMR, 12.12.2000 - 45424/99
- EGMR, 28.06.2001 - 45424/99
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (4)
- EGMR, 01.06.1999 - 39860/98
SKORKIEWICZ v. POLAND
Auszug aus EGMR, 12.12.2000 - 45424/99
The Court recalls that even though the rights stemming from the payment of contributions to the social insurance system, in particular the right to derive benefits from such a system - for instance in the form of a pension -, can be asserted under Article 1 of Protocol No. 1, this provision cannot be interpreted as giving an individual a right to a pension of a particular amount (Eur. Comm. HR, no. 5849/72, Müller v. Austria Comm. Report, 1.10.1975, D.R. 3, p. 25; no. 10671/83, Dec. 4.3.1985, D.R. 42, p. 229; Storkiewicz v. Poland (dec.), no 39860/98, ECHR 1999, and Domalewski v. Poland, cited above). - EGMR, 12.10.2000 - 43440/98
JANKOVIC c. CROATIE
Auszug aus EGMR, 12.12.2000 - 45424/99
This also applies in the specific context of the dissolution of the former Yugoslavia and with regard to persons who were granted special privileges by the former State, as, for instance, members of the former State's army, in particular in view of the fact that ever since January 1973 all contributions to the pension fund of the Yugoslav People's Army officers had been paid to the federal fund in Belgrade which, failing any agreement on State succession, has not been divided among the successor States (see Jankovic v. Croatia (dec.), no. 43440/98, ECHR 2000). - EKMR, 16.12.1974 - 5849/72
MÜLLER v. AUSTRIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 12.12.2000 - 45424/99
The Court recalls that even though the rights stemming from the payment of contributions to the social insurance system, in particular the right to derive benefits from such a system - for instance in the form of a pension -, can be asserted under Article 1 of Protocol No. 1, this provision cannot be interpreted as giving an individual a right to a pension of a particular amount (Eur. Comm. HR, no. 5849/72, Müller v. Austria Comm. Report, 1.10.1975, D.R. 3, p. 25; no. 10671/83, Dec. 4.3.1985, D.R. 42, p. 229; Storkiewicz v. Poland (dec.), no 39860/98, ECHR 1999, and Domalewski v. Poland, cited above). - EKMR, 04.03.1985 - 10671/83
T. v. SWEDEN
Auszug aus EGMR, 12.12.2000 - 45424/99
The Court recalls that even though the rights stemming from the payment of contributions to the social insurance system, in particular the right to derive benefits from such a system - for instance in the form of a pension -, can be asserted under Article 1 of Protocol No. 1, this provision cannot be interpreted as giving an individual a right to a pension of a particular amount (Eur. Comm. HR, no. 5849/72, Müller v. Austria Comm. Report, 1.10.1975, D.R. 3, p. 25; no. 10671/83, Dec. 4.3.1985, D.R. 42, p. 229; Storkiewicz v. Poland (dec.), no 39860/98, ECHR 1999, and Domalewski v. Poland, cited above).