Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 12.12.2006 - 23865/02 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2006,49968) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
SNEGON v. SLOVAKIA
Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 13, Art. 14, Art. 29, Art. 29 Abs. 3, Art. 35, Art. 35 Abs. 1, Art. 35 Abs. 4, Art. 41 MRK
Preliminary objection allowed (exhaustion) Violation of Art. 6-1 Not necessary to examine Art. 13 Pecuniary damage - claim dismissed Non-pecuniary damage - financial award ...
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (3)
- EGMR, 27.06.2000 - 30979/96
FRYDLENDER c. FRANCE
Auszug aus EGMR, 12.12.2006 - 23865/02
The Court reiterates that the reasonableness of the length of proceedings must be assessed in the light of the circumstances of the case and with reference to the following criteria: the complexity of the case, the conduct of the applicant and the relevant authorities and what was at stake for the applicant in the dispute (see, among many other authorities, Frydlender v. France [GC], no. 30979/96, § 43, ECHR 2000-VII). - EGMR, 22.10.2002 - 57984/00
ANDRASIK AND OTHERS v. SLOVAKIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 12.12.2006 - 23865/02
57984/00, 60226/00, 60237/00, 60242/00, 60679/00, 60680/00 and 68563/01, ECHR 2002-IX) in accordance with the applicable requirements. - EGMR, 27.04.1988 - 9659/82
BOYLE AND RICE v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
Auszug aus EGMR, 12.12.2006 - 23865/02
For similar reasons the applicant did not have an "arguable claim" in that respect and Article 13 is therefore inapplicable to that complaint (see Boyle and Rice v. the United Kingdom, judgment of 27 April 1988, Series A no. 131, § 52).