Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 12.12.2006 - 64212/01 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2006,52994) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
WOJTUNIK v. POLAND
Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 29, Art. 29 Abs. 3, Art. 35, Art. 35 Abs. 3, Art. 35 Abs. 1, Art. 41, Art. 13 MRK
Preliminary objection dismissed (exhaustion) Violation of Art. 6-1 Pecuniary damage - claim dismissed Non-pecuniary damage - financial award (englisch)
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (4)
- EGMR, 27.06.2000 - 30979/96
FRYDLENDER c. FRANCE
Auszug aus EGMR, 12.12.2006 - 64212/01
The Court reiterates that the reasonableness of the length of proceedings must be assessed in the light of the circumstances of the case and with reference to the following criteria: the complexity of the case, the conduct of the applicant and the relevant authorities and what was at stake for the applicant in the dispute (see, among many other authorities, Frydlender v. France [GC], no. 30979/96, § 43, ECHR 2000-VII, Kusmierek v. Poland, no. 10675/02, 21 September 2004, § 62; Zynger v. Poland, no. 66096/01, 13 July 2004, § 45). - EGMR, 13.07.2004 - 66096/01
ZYNGER v. POLAND
Auszug aus EGMR, 12.12.2006 - 64212/01
The Court reiterates that the reasonableness of the length of proceedings must be assessed in the light of the circumstances of the case and with reference to the following criteria: the complexity of the case, the conduct of the applicant and the relevant authorities and what was at stake for the applicant in the dispute (see, among many other authorities, Frydlender v. France [GC], no. 30979/96, § 43, ECHR 2000-VII, Kusmierek v. Poland, no. 10675/02, 21 September 2004, § 62; Zynger v. Poland, no. 66096/01, 13 July 2004, § 45). - EGMR, 21.09.2004 - 10675/02
KUSMIEREK v. POLAND
Auszug aus EGMR, 12.12.2006 - 64212/01
The Court reiterates that the reasonableness of the length of proceedings must be assessed in the light of the circumstances of the case and with reference to the following criteria: the complexity of the case, the conduct of the applicant and the relevant authorities and what was at stake for the applicant in the dispute (see, among many other authorities, Frydlender v. France [GC], no. 30979/96, § 43, ECHR 2000-VII, Kusmierek v. Poland, no. 10675/02, 21 September 2004, § 62; Zynger v. Poland, no. 66096/01, 13 July 2004, § 45). - EGMR, 01.03.2005 - 15212/03
CHARZYNSKI c. POLOGNE
Auszug aus EGMR, 12.12.2006 - 64212/01
[1] For a more detailed presentation of the relevant domestic law see Ratajczyk v. Poland (dec.), no. 11215/02, ECHR 2005; Charzynski v. Poland (dec.), no. 15212/03, ECHR 2005.