Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  ÇÖLGEÇEN AND OTHERS v. TURKEY

  Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;Violation of Article 2 of Protocol No. 1 - Right to education-general (Article 2 of Protocol No. 1 - Right to education);Pecuniary damage - claim dismissed (Article 41 - Pecuniary damage;Just ...

Sonstiges

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  [ENG]

Wird zitiert von ... (0)Neu Zitiert selbst (6)

• EGMR, 29.01.2013 - 75381/10

  KOMATINOVIC v. SERBIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 12.12.2017 - 50124/07

  The submission of incomplete and thus misleading information may also amount to an abuse of the right of application, especially if the information concerns the very core of the case and no sufficient explanation has been provided for the failure to disclose that information (see Hüttner v. Germany (dec.), no. 23130/04, 9 June 2006, and Komatinovic v. Serbia (dec.), no. 75381/10, 29 January 2013).
• EGMR, 26.04.2016 - 62649/10

  Türkei verurteilt - Aleviten diskriminiert

  Auszug aus EGMR, 12.12.2017 - 50124/07

  Following this tacit refusal the applicants could have brought administrative proceedings with a view to airing this particular complaint before the national authorities (see, for example, Izzettin Dogan and Others v. Turkey [GC], no. 62649/10, § 12, ECHR 2016).
• EGMR, 02.04.2013 - 25851/09

  TARANTINO ET AUTRES c. ITALIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 12.12.2017 - 50124/07

  The Court reiterates that the guarantees of Article 2 of Protocol No. 1 apply to existing institutions of higher education within the member States of the Council of Europe and that access to any institution of higher education existing at a given time is an inherent part of the right set out in the first sentence of Article 2 of Protocol No. 1 (see Tarantino and Others v. Italy, nos. 25851/09, 29284/09 and 64090/09, § 43, ECHR 2013 (extracts)).

 
• EGMR, 16.11.2004 - 29865/96

  Diskriminierung türkischer Ehefrauen durch Verpflichtung zur Tragung des Namens …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 12.12.2017 - 50124/07

  Even assuming that this remedy offered only a remote prospect of success, it would not have been a futile step and would have had the effect at least of postponing the beginning of the six-month period (see, in particular, Ünal Tekeli v. Turkey, no. 29865/96, § 38, ECHR 2004-X (extracts)).
• EGMR, 25.02.1982 - 7511/76

  CAMPBELL ET COSANS c. ROYAUME-UNI

  Auszug aus EGMR, 12.12.2017 - 50124/07

  In spite of its importance, this right is not, however, absolute, but may be subject to limitations; these are permitted by implication since the right of access "by its very nature calls for regulation by the State" (see Campbell and Cosans v. the United Kingdom, 25 February 1982, § 41, Series A no. 48).
• EGMR, 19.06.2006 - 23130/04

  Menschenrechtskonvention : Unzulässigkeit der Beschwerde wegen Missbrauchs des …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 12.12.2017 - 50124/07

  The submission of incomplete and thus misleading information may also amount to an abuse of the right of application, especially if the information concerns the very core of the case and no sufficient explanation has been provided for the failure to disclose that information (see Hüttner v. Germany (dec.), no. 23130/04, 9 June 2006, and Komatinovic v. Serbia (dec.), no. 75381/10, 29 January 2013).