Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 12.12.2019 - 32141/10 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2019,43165) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
ROMEVA v. NORTH MACEDONIA
Violation of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 - Protection of property (Article 1 para. 1 of Protocol No. 1 - Peaceful enjoyment of possessions) (englisch)
Sonstiges
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)
ROMEVA v. 'THE FORMER YUGOSLAV REPUBLIC OF MACEDONIA
Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1 MRK
[ENG]
Verfahrensgang
- EGMR, 12.12.2019 - 32141/10
- EGMR, 03.12.2020 - 32141/10
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (5)
- EGMR, 18.11.2010 - 27940/07
TUNNEL REPORT LIMITED c. FRANCE
Auszug aus EGMR, 12.12.2019 - 32141/10
Indeed, where an issue in the general interest is at stake, it is incumbent on the public authorities to act in good time, in an appropriate and consistent manner (see Tunnel Report Limited v. France, no. 27940/07, § 39, 18 November 2010, and Zolotas v. Greece (no. 2), no. 66610/09, § 42, ECHR 2013 (extracts)). - EGMR, 30.07.2015 - 1046/12
ZAMMIT AND ATTARD CASSAR v. MALTA
Auszug aus EGMR, 12.12.2019 - 32141/10
It must look behind appearances and investigate the realities of the situation complained of (see Broniowski, cited above, § 151; Hutten-Czapska v. Poland [GC], no. 35014/97, § 168, ECHR 2006-VIII; and Zammit and Attard Cassar v. Malta, no. 1046/12, § 57, 30 July 2015). - EGMR, 29.04.1999 - 25088/94
CHASSAGNOU ET AUTRES c. FRANCE
Auszug aus EGMR, 12.12.2019 - 32141/10
In assessing compliance with Article 1 of Protocol No. 1, the Court must carry out an overall examination of the various interests in issue (see Perdigão, cited above, § 68), bearing in mind that the Convention is intended to safeguard rights that are "practical and effective" (see, for example, Chassagnou and Others v. France [GC], nos. 25088/94 and 2 others, § 100, ECHR 1999-III). - EGMR, 23.09.1982 - 7151/75
SPORRONG ET LÖNNROTH c. SUÈDE
Auszug aus EGMR, 12.12.2019 - 32141/10
The requisite "fair balance" will not be struck where the person concerned bears an individual and excessive burden (see, for example, Sporrong and Lönnroth v. Sweden, 23 September 1982, §§ 69-74, Series A no. 52, and Brumarescu v. Romania [GC], no. 28342/95, § 78, ECHR 1999-VII). - EGMR, 08.03.2006 - 59532/00
BLECIC v. CROATIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 12.12.2019 - 32141/10
However, noting that the issue of compatibility ratione materiae is a question that falls under the Court's jurisdiction, the Court finds it necessary to examine the matter of its own motion (see Tanase v. Moldova [GC], no. 7/08, § 131, ECHR 2010, and Blecic v. Croatia [GC], no. 59532/00, § 67, ECHR 2006-III).