Rechtsprechung
EGMR, 12.12.2019 - 63754/09 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2019,43168) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
PIKHUN v. UKRAINE
Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading treatment;Inhuman treatment) (Substantive aspect);Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Effective investigation) (Procedural aspect);Violation of Article 5 - Right to ...
Sonstiges
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (2)
- EGMR, 30.03.2004 - 66561/01
MERIT v. UKRAINE
Auszug aus EGMR, 12.12.2019 - 63754/09
The reasonableness of the length of proceedings must be assessed in the light of the circumstances of the case and with reference to the following criteria: the complexity of the case, the conduct of the applicant and the relevant authorities dealing with the case (see, among many other authorities, Pélissier and Sassi v. France [GC], no. 25444/94, § 67, ECHR 1999-II; and Merit v. Ukraine, no. 66561/01, § 72, 30 March 2004). - EGMR, 25.03.1999 - 25444/94
PÉLISSIER AND SASSI v. FRANCE
Auszug aus EGMR, 12.12.2019 - 63754/09
The reasonableness of the length of proceedings must be assessed in the light of the circumstances of the case and with reference to the following criteria: the complexity of the case, the conduct of the applicant and the relevant authorities dealing with the case (see, among many other authorities, Pélissier and Sassi v. France [GC], no. 25444/94, § 67, ECHR 1999-II; and Merit v. Ukraine, no. 66561/01, § 72, 30 March 2004).