Volltextveröffentlichungen (2)

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  MARTINIE contre la FRANCE

  Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 13, Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1 MRK
  Partiellement recevable Partiellement irrecevable (französisch)

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  MARTINIE v. FRANCE [Extracts]

  Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 13, Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1 MRK
  Partly admissible Partly inadmissible (englisch)

Verfahrensgang

• EGMR, 13.01.2004 - 58675/00
• EGMR, 12.04.2006 - 58675/00

Wird zitiert von ... (0)Neu Zitiert selbst (7)

• EGMR, 27.06.2000 - 30979/96

  FRYDLENDER c. FRANCE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 13.01.2004 - 58675/00

  Lastly, the applicant pointed out that, in Frydlender v. France ([GC], no. 30979/96, § 40, ECHR 2000-VII), the Grand Chamber of the Court had indicated that Pellegrin did not cast doubt on the principle that the exceptions to the safeguards afforded by Article 6 § 1 should be interpreted restrictively.
• EGMR, 12.07.2001 - 44759/98

  Verletzung des Rechts auf ein faires Verfahren durch überlange Verfahrensdauer; …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 13.01.2004 - 58675/00

  It considers that any other solution might lead to results incompatible with the object and purpose of the Convention (see, inter alia, Ferrazzini v. Italy [GC], no. 44759/98, § 24, ECHR 2001-VII).
• EGMR, 28.07.1999 - 34884/97

  BOTTAZZI c. ITALIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 13.01.2004 - 58675/00

  Having particular regard to France, it has held that this provision is applicable to proceedings before the Disciplinary Offences (Budget and Finance) Court (see Guisset, cited above), and to proceedings before the Ile-de-France Regional Audit Office and the Court of Audit, the purpose of which was mainly to determine whether the mayor of a Seine-Saint-Denis locality should be declared de facto accountant and ordered to make a repayment (see Richard-Dubarry v. France (dec.), no. 53929/00, ECHR 2003-XI; for examples concerning the courts of other Contracting States, see, among other authorities, Francesco Lombardo v. Italy, judgment of 26 November 1992, Series A no. 249-B, Bottazzi v. Italy [GC], no. 34884/97, ECHR 1999-V, and Logothetis v. Greece, no. 46352/99, 12 April 2001, bearing in mind that these judgments concern rulings by the Italian and Greek Courts of Audit on disputes concerning government employees" pensions, which is of course different from audits of accounts submitted by accountants).

 
• EGMR, 08.12.1999 - 28541/95

  PELLEGRIN v. FRANCE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 13.01.2004 - 58675/00

  In Pellegrin v. France ([GC], no. 28541/95, ECHR 1999-VIII), the Grand Chamber of the Court had held that disputes involving public servants performing functions of this type fell outside the scope of Article 6 § 1, the States having a legitimate interest in requiring of these servants a special bond of trust and loyalty.
• EGMR, 26.09.2000 - 33933/96

  GUISSET c. FRANCE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 13.01.2004 - 58675/00

  The Government added that, unlike the Belgian Court of Audit - whose powers had been examined by the European Commission of Human Rights in Muyldermans v. Belgium (judgment of 23 October 1991, Series A no. 214-A, opinion of the Commission) - or the French Disciplinary Offences (Budget and Finance) Court - which determined "criminal charges" within the meaning of the Convention (the Government referred in that connection to Guisset v. France (no. 33933/96, ECHR 2000-IX)) - the role of the French Court of Audit and the regional audit offices was limited to re-establishing accounting norms.
• EGMR, 01.06.2004 - 53929/00

  RICHARD-DUBARRY c. FRANCE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 13.01.2004 - 58675/00

  Having particular regard to France, it has held that this provision is applicable to proceedings before the Disciplinary Offences (Budget and Finance) Court (see Guisset, cited above), and to proceedings before the Ile-de-France Regional Audit Office and the Court of Audit, the purpose of which was mainly to determine whether the mayor of a Seine-Saint-Denis locality should be declared de facto accountant and ordered to make a repayment (see Richard-Dubarry v. France (dec.), no. 53929/00, ECHR 2003-XI; for examples concerning the courts of other Contracting States, see, among other authorities, Francesco Lombardo v. Italy, judgment of 26 November 1992, Series A no. 249-B, Bottazzi v. Italy [GC], no. 34884/97, ECHR 1999-V, and Logothetis v. Greece, no. 46352/99, 12 April 2001, bearing in mind that these judgments concern rulings by the Italian and Greek Courts of Audit on disputes concerning government employees" pensions, which is of course different from audits of accounts submitted by accountants).
• EGMR, 26.11.1992 - 11519/85

  FRANCESCO LOMBARDO v. ITALY

  Auszug aus EGMR, 13.01.2004 - 58675/00

  Having particular regard to France, it has held that this provision is applicable to proceedings before the Disciplinary Offences (Budget and Finance) Court (see Guisset, cited above), and to proceedings before the Ile-de-France Regional Audit Office and the Court of Audit, the purpose of which was mainly to determine whether the mayor of a Seine-Saint-Denis locality should be declared de facto accountant and ordered to make a repayment (see Richard-Dubarry v. France (dec.), no. 53929/00, ECHR 2003-XI; for examples concerning the courts of other Contracting States, see, among other authorities, Francesco Lombardo v. Italy, judgment of 26 November 1992, Series A no. 249-B, Bottazzi v. Italy [GC], no. 34884/97, ECHR 1999-V, and Logothetis v. Greece, no. 46352/99, 12 April 2001, bearing in mind that these judgments concern rulings by the Italian and Greek Courts of Audit on disputes concerning government employees" pensions, which is of course different from audits of accounts submitted by accountants).