Rechtsprechung
EGMR, 13.01.2009 - 42894/04, 42904/04, 42905/04, 42906/04, 42907/04, 42908/04, 42909/04, 42910/04 |
Zitiervorschläge
EGMR, 13.01.2009 - 42894/04, 42904/04, 42905/04, 42906/04, 42907/04, 42908/04, 42909/04, 42910/04 (https://dejure.org/2009,49513)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 13.01.2009 - 42894/04, 42904/04, 42905/04, 42906/04, 42907/04, 42908/04, 42909/04, 42910/04 (https://dejure.org/2009,49513)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 13. Januar 2009 - 42894/04, 42904/04, 42905/04, 42906/04, 42907/04, 42908/04, 42909/04, 42910/04 (https://dejure.org/2009,49513)
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2009,49513) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
ARAT AND OTHERSv. TURKEY
(englisch)
Wird zitiert von ... (2) Neu Zitiert selbst (2)
- EGMR, 28.07.1999 - 22774/93
IMMOBILIARE SAFFI v. ITALY
Auszug aus EGMR, 13.01.2009 - 42894/04
Whilst a delay in the execution of a judgment may be justified in particular circumstances, it may not be such as to impair the essence of the right protected under Article 6 § 1 (see Immobiliare Saffi v. Italy [GC], no. 22774/93, § 74, ECHR 1999-V). - EGMR, 09.12.1994 - 13427/87
RAFFINERIES GRECQUES STRAN ET STRATIS ANDREADIS c. GRÈCE
Auszug aus EGMR, 13.01.2009 - 42894/04
The Court reiterates that a "claim" can constitute a "possession" within the meaning of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 to the Convention if it is sufficiently established to be enforceable (see Stran Greek Refineries and Stratis Andreadis v. Greece, judgment of 9 December 1994, Series A no. 301-B, § 59).
- EGMR - 42908/04
[ENG]
42894/04, 42904/04, 42905/04, 42906/04, 42907/04, 42908/04, 42909/04 and 42910/04 introduced by Mehmet Arat, Haci Atsiz, Hikmet M. Atsiz, Edip Çelik, Ramazan Alaca, Erdal Günes, Mehmet Atsiz and Mehmet Can respectively against Turkey lodged on 6 September 2004.42894/04.
42904/04.
42905/04.
42906/04.
42907/04.
42909/04.
42910/04.
- EGMR, 06.02.2018 - 36459/06
YAPAN v. TURKEY
The Court recalls that a person who has obtained a judgment against the State may not be expected to bring separate enforcement proceedings (see Metaxas v. Greece, no. 8415/02, § 19, 27 May 2004, and Arat and Others v. Turkey, nos. 42894/04, 42904/04, 42905/04, 42906/04, 42907/04, 42908/04, 42909/04 and 42910/04, § 19, 13 January 2009).