Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  CHUYKINA v. UKRAINE

  Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 41 MRK
  Violations of Art. 6-1 Remainder inadmissible Pecuniary damage - claim dismissed Non-pecuniary damage - award (englisch)

Sonstiges

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  [ENG]

Verfahrensgang

• EGMR, 13.01.2011 - 28924/04
• EGMR, 14.02.2018 - 28924/04

Wird zitiert von ...Neu Zitiert selbst (4)

• EGMR, 27.06.2000 - 30979/96

  FRYDLENDER c. FRANCE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 13.01.2011 - 28924/04

  The Court reiterates that the reasonableness of the length of proceedings must be assessed in the light of the circumstances of the case and with reference to the following criteria: the complexity of the case, the conduct of the applicant and the relevant authorities and what was at stake for the applicant in the dispute (see, among many other authorities, Frydlender v. France [GC], no. 30979/96, § 43, ECHR 2000-VII).
• EGMR, 21.02.1975 - 4451/70

  GOLDER c. ROYAUME-UNI

  Auszug aus EGMR, 13.01.2011 - 28924/04

  The Court reiterates that the procedural guarantees laid down in Article 6 secure to everyone the right to have any claim relating to his civil rights and obligations brought before a court or tribunal; in this way Article 6 embodies the "right to a court", of which the right of access, that is the right to institute proceedings before courts in civil matters, constitutes one aspect (see Golder v. the United Kingdom, 21 February 1975, §§ 28-36, Series A no. 18).
• EGMR, 22.04.1992 - 12351/86

  VIDAL c. BELGIQUE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 13.01.2011 - 28924/04

  Furthermore, the domestic courts are best placed for assessing the credibility of witnesses and the relevance of evidence to the issues in the case (see, amongst many authorities, Vidal v. Belgium, 22 April 1992, § 32, Series A no. 235-B, and Edwards v. the United Kingdom, 16 December 1992, § 34, Series A no. 247-B,).
• EGMR, 16.12.1992 - 13071/87

  EDWARDS c. ROYAUME-UNI

  Auszug aus EGMR, 13.01.2011 - 28924/04

  Furthermore, the domestic courts are best placed for assessing the credibility of witnesses and the relevance of evidence to the issues in the case (see, amongst many authorities, Vidal v. Belgium, 22 April 1992, § 32, Series A no. 235-B, and Edwards v. the United Kingdom, 16 December 1992, § 34, Series A no. 247-B,).

• EGMR, 04.04.2013 - 1278/06

  TKACHENKO c. UKRAINE

  Même si la Cour n'est pas en position d'apprécier le bien-fondé des jugements rendus par les tribunaux internes, elle est de l'avis que les renvois constants dans le cadre d'une même procédure peuvent dévoiler un dysfonctionnement sérieux du système juridique (voir, mutatis mutandis, Wierciszewska c. Pologne, no 41431/98, § 46, 25 novembre 2003 ; et Chuykina c. Ukraine, no 28924/04, § 42, 13 janvier 2011).