Rechtsprechung
   EGMR, 13.01.2011 - 45190/07   

Zitiervorschläge
https://dejure.org/2011,51791
EGMR, 13.01.2011 - 45190/07 (https://dejure.org/2011,51791)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 13.01.2011 - 45190/07 (https://dejure.org/2011,51791)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 13. Januar 2011 - 45190/07 (https://dejure.org/2011,51791)
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2011,51791) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.

Volltextveröffentlichung

Sonstiges

Verfahrensgang

 
Sortierung



Kontextvorschau





Hinweis: Klicken Sie auf das Sprechblasensymbol, um eine Kontextvorschau im Fließtext zu sehen. Um alle zu sehen, genügt ein Doppelklick.

Wird zitiert von ... (0)Neu Zitiert selbst (8)

  • EGMR, 26.03.2009 - 49916/07

    MEDIC v. CROATIA

    Auszug aus EGMR, 13.01.2011 - 45190/07
    The applicant's requests before the Supreme Court and the Constitutional Court were essentially aimed at remedying the violation of the Convention alleged before the Court and therefore the costs incurred in respect of these remedies may be taken into account in assessing the claim for costs (see Scordino v. Italy (no. 1) [GC], no. 36813/97, § 28, ECHR 2006-V; and Medic v. Croatia, no. 49916/07, § 50, 26 March 2009).
  • EGMR, 25.11.2003 - 41431/98

    WIERCISZEWSKA v. POLAND

    Auszug aus EGMR, 13.01.2011 - 45190/07
    Although the Court is not in a position to analyse the juridical quality of the domestic courts' decisions, it considers that, since the remittal of cases for re-examination is frequently ordered as a result of errors committed by lower courts, the repetition of such orders within one set of proceedings may disclose a serious deficiency in the judicial system (see, for example, Mamic v. Slovenia (no. 2), no. 75778/01, § 35, ECHR 2006-X (extracts); and Wierciszewska v. Poland, no.41431/98, § 46, 25 November 2003).
  • EGMR, 27.06.2000 - 30979/96

    FRYDLENDER c. FRANCE

    Auszug aus EGMR, 13.01.2011 - 45190/07
    The Court reiterates that the reasonableness of the length of proceedings must be assessed in the light of the circumstances of the case and with reference to the following criteria: the complexity of the case, the conduct of the applicant and the relevant authorities and what was at stake for the applicant in the dispute (see, among many other authorities, Frydlender v. France [GC], no. 30979/96, § 43, ECHR 2000-VII).
  • RG, 04.03.1901 - 88/01

    Gestattet das freiwillige Abstehen auch nur einer Partei vom Zweikampfe die

    Auszug aus EGMR, 13.01.2011 - 45190/07
    The relevant provisions of the Civil Procedure Act (Zakon o parnicom postupku, The Official Gazette, nos. 53/91, 91/92, 112/99, 88/01 and 117/03) provide as follows:.
  • EGMR, 12.02.2004 - 47287/99

    PEREZ c. FRANCE

    Auszug aus EGMR, 13.01.2011 - 45190/07
    However, Article 6 § 1 under its "civil head" applies to criminal proceedings involving a determination of pecuniary claims asserted by the injured parties (so-called "civil-party complaints") and, even in the absence of such claims, to those criminal proceedings the outcome of which is decisive for the "civil right" in question (see Perez v. France [GC], no. 47287/99, §§ 65-67 and 71, ECHR 2004-I).
  • Appellationsgericht Basel, 26.09.2008 - 16/07
    Auszug aus EGMR, 13.01.2011 - 45190/07
    The relevant part of the Courts Act (Zakon o sudovima, Official Gazette nos. 150/05, 16/07 and 113/08), which entered into force on 29 December 2005, reads as follows:.
  • EGMR, 27.07.2006 - 75778/01

    MAMIC c. SLOVENIE (N° 2)

    Auszug aus EGMR, 13.01.2011 - 45190/07
    Although the Court is not in a position to analyse the juridical quality of the domestic courts' decisions, it considers that, since the remittal of cases for re-examination is frequently ordered as a result of errors committed by lower courts, the repetition of such orders within one set of proceedings may disclose a serious deficiency in the judicial system (see, for example, Mamic v. Slovenia (no. 2), no. 75778/01, § 35, ECHR 2006-X (extracts); and Wierciszewska v. Poland, no.41431/98, § 46, 25 November 2003).
  • EGMR, 10.01.2008 - 18584/05

    JAKESEVIC v. CROATIA

    Auszug aus EGMR, 13.01.2011 - 45190/07
    Thus, it was only when those civil proceedings were instituted that the outcome of the criminal proceedings became relevant for the determination of the applicant's "civil right" to compensation, thereby attracting the applicability of Article 6 § 1 under its civil head to the criminal proceedings at issue (see Jakesevic v. Croatia (dec.), no. 18584/05, 10 January 2008).
Haben Sie eine Ergänzung? Oder haben Sie einen Fehler gefunden? Schreiben Sie uns.
Sie können auswählen (Maus oder Pfeiltasten):
(Liste aufgrund Ihrer bisherigen Eingabe)
Komplette Übersicht