Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  MIHAYLOVA v. BULGARIA

  Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 35, Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1 MRK
  Inadmissible (englisch)

Sonstiges

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  [ENG]

Wird zitiert von ...Neu Zitiert selbst (6)

• EGMR, 16.12.1992 - 13071/87

  EDWARDS c. ROYAUME-UNI

  Auszug aus EGMR, 13.01.2015 - 30942/04

  In addition, it observes that before deciding whether or not there has been a violation of Article 6 § 1 of the Convention it is to take into account the "proceedings as a whole" (see Edwards v. the United Kingdom, judgment of 16 December 1992, Series A no. 247-B, § 34; Mirilashvili v. Russia, no. 6293/04, § 164, 11 December 2008; and Kinský v. the Czech Republic, no. 42856/06, § 83, 9 February 2012).
• EGMR, 21.01.1999 - 30544/96

  GARCÍA RUIZ v. SPAIN

  Auszug aus EGMR, 13.01.2015 - 30942/04

  However, the Court observes that it is not called upon to deal with errors of fact or law allegedly committed by a national court, as it is not a court of fourth instance (see, for example, García Ruiz v. Spain [GC], no. 30544/96, § 28, ECHR 1999-I; and Khodorkovskiy and Lebedev v. Russia, nos. 11082/06 and 13772/05, §§ 803-4, 25 July 2013).
• EGMR, 24.07.2003 - 52854/99

  RIABYKH c. RUSSIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 13.01.2015 - 30942/04

  The principle of legal certainty presupposes that no party is entitled to seek a review of a final and binding judgment merely for the purpose of obtaining a rehearing and fresh determination of the case (see Ryabykh v. Russia, no. 52854/99, § 52, ECHR 2003-IX).

 
• EGMR, 11.12.2008 - 6293/04

  MIRILASHVILI v. RUSSIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 13.01.2015 - 30942/04

  In addition, it observes that before deciding whether or not there has been a violation of Article 6 § 1 of the Convention it is to take into account the "proceedings as a whole" (see Edwards v. the United Kingdom, judgment of 16 December 1992, Series A no. 247-B, § 34; Mirilashvili v. Russia, no. 6293/04, § 164, 11 December 2008; and Kinský v. the Czech Republic, no. 42856/06, § 83, 9 February 2012).
• EGMR, 12.10.2010 - 30767/05

  MARIA ATANASIU ET AUTRES c. ROUMANIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 13.01.2015 - 30942/04

  In addition, the Court has accepted that in situations such as that in the present case, involving a wide-reaching legislative scheme with a significant economic impact, the national authorities must have a wide margin of appreciation in selecting the measures to secure respect for property rights or to regulate ownership relations (see also Broniowski v. Poland [GC], no. 31443/96, § 182, ECHR 2004-V; Maria Atanasiu and Others v. Romania, nos. 30767/05 and 33800/06, §§ 171-72, 12 October 2010; and Sivova and Koleva, cited above, §§ 97-98).
• EGMR, 25.07.2013 - 11082/06

  Chodorkowski: Moskauer Prozesse sind unfair

  Auszug aus EGMR, 13.01.2015 - 30942/04

  However, the Court observes that it is not called upon to deal with errors of fact or law allegedly committed by a national court, as it is not a court of fourth instance (see, for example, García Ruiz v. Spain [GC], no. 30544/96, § 28, ECHR 1999-I; and Khodorkovskiy and Lebedev v. Russia, nos. 11082/06 and 13772/05, §§ 803-4, 25 July 2013).

• EGMR, 17.12.2019 - 77335/14

  MALTSEV ET AUTRES c. RUSSIE

  Or, de l'avis de la Cour, si les requérants avaient fait preuve d'une diligence raisonnable lors de l'acquisition de ces biens, ils n'auraient pas pu ignorer ces faits (voir, mutatis mutandis, Zhidov et autres c. Russie, nos 54490/10 et 3 autres, §§ 115-116, 16 octobre 2018, affaire dans laquelle l'une des requérantes avait acheté une parcelle dans une zone protégée, située juste à côté d'une digue protégeant des oléoducs ; voir aussi, mutatis mutandis, Mihaylova c. Bulgarie (déc.), no 30942/04, §§ 54-55, 5 février 2015, affaire dans laquelle le terrain en cause, qui avait jadis fait l'objet d'une expropriation et dont le titre de propriété avait été restitué au père de la requérante, était depuis longtemps exploité par deux sociétés tierces).