Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 13.03.2012 - 39549/02 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2012,15548) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
BENIASHVILI v. RUSSIA AND GEORGIA
Art. 3, Art. ... 4, Art. 5, Art. 5 Abs. 1 Buchst. f, Art. 5 Abs. 2, Art. 5 Abs. 4, Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 6 Abs. 3 Buchst. b, Art. 6 Abs. 3 Buchst. c, Art. 6 Abs. 3 Buchst. d, Art. 7, Art. 8, Art. 12, Art. 13, Art. 14, Art. 34, Art. 37, Art. 37 Abs. 1 MRK
Partly struck out of the list Partly inadmissible (englisch)
Sonstiges
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)
[ENG]
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (4)
- EGMR, 12.04.2005 - 36378/02
CHAMAÏEV ET AUTRES c. GEORGIE ET RUSSIE
Auszug aus EGMR, 13.03.2012 - 39549/02
On 10 December 2000 the applicant was arrested by the Georgian police in Tbilisi on the basis of Article 61 of the Convention on Legal Assistance and Legal Relations in Civil, Family and Criminal Matters of 22 January 1993 (see Shamayev and Others v. Georgia and Russia, no. 36378/02, § 266, ECHR 2005-III) in relation to the criminal proceedings pending against him in Russia and for the consequent purpose of his extradition there. - EGMR, 15.11.2005 - 30789/04
BATALOV v. LITHUANIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 13.03.2012 - 39549/02
Consequently, by the time of his transfer to the jurisdiction of the Russian Federation, the applicant obviously knew the reasons for his international search, arrest and continued detention and possessed sufficient details about the charge of murder which had been brought against him in 1998 (compare, for instance, with Ryabikin v. Russia (dec.), no. 8320/04, ECHR 10 April 2007 and Batalov v. Russia (dec.), no. 30789/04, 15 November 2005). - EGMR, 19.06.2008 - 8320/04
RYABIKIN v. RUSSIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 13.03.2012 - 39549/02
Consequently, by the time of his transfer to the jurisdiction of the Russian Federation, the applicant obviously knew the reasons for his international search, arrest and continued detention and possessed sufficient details about the charge of murder which had been brought against him in 1998 (compare, for instance, with Ryabikin v. Russia (dec.), no. 8320/04, ECHR 10 April 2007 and Batalov v. Russia (dec.), no. 30789/04, 15 November 2005). - EGMR, 25.09.1992 - 13611/88
Klaus Croissant
Auszug aus EGMR, 13.03.2012 - 39549/02
Secondly, as to the participation of the applicant's girlfriend in the trial, the Court reiterates that the right to be defended by counsel of one's own choosing is not absolute (see Croissant v. Germany, 25 September 1992, § 29, Series A no. 237-B).