Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  KIISA v. ESTONIA

  Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 13 MRK
  Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Civil proceedings Article 6-1 - Reasonable time) Violation of Article 13 - Right to an effective remedy (Article 13 - Effective remedy) (englisch)

Sonstiges

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  Kiisa v. Estonia

Wird zitiert von ... (0)Neu Zitiert selbst (25)

• EGMR, 19.04.2007 - 63235/00

  VILHO ESKELINEN AND OTHERS v. FINLAND

  Auszug aus EGMR, 13.03.2014 - 16587/10

  The Court reiterates that an award under this head may be made only in so far as the costs and expenses were actually and necessarily incurred in order to avoid, or obtain redress for, the violation found and are reasonable as to quantum (see, among other authorities, Vilho Eskelinen and Others v. Finland [GC], no. 63235/00, § 105, ECHR 2007-IV).
• EGMR, 01.03.2005 - 24549/03

  MICHALAK v. POLAND

  Auszug aus EGMR, 13.03.2014 - 16587/10

  57984/00, 60226/00, 60237/00, 60242/00, 60679/00, 60680/00 and 68563/01, ECHR 2002-IX) and in Ä°çyer v. Turkey ((dec.), no. 18888/02, ECHR 2006-I) concerning a new compensation remedy for interference with property (see also Charzynski v. Poland (dec.), no. 15212/03, ECHR 2005-V, and Tadeusz Michalak v. Poland, no. 24549/03, 1 March 2005).
• EGMR, 01.03.2010 - 3843/02

  Auszug aus EGMR, 13.03.2014 - 16587/10

  46113/99, 3843/02, 13751/02, 13466/03, 10200/04, 14163/04, 19993/04 and 21819/04, § 87, ECHR 2010).

 
• EGMR, 12.01.2006 - 18888/02

  IÇYER c. TURQUIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 13.03.2014 - 16587/10

  57984/00, 60226/00, 60237/00, 60242/00, 60679/00, 60680/00 and 68563/01, ECHR 2002-IX) and in Ä°çyer v. Turkey ((dec.), no. 18888/02, ECHR 2006-I) concerning a new compensation remedy for interference with property (see also Charzynski v. Poland (dec.), no. 15212/03, ECHR 2005-V, and Tadeusz Michalak v. Poland, no. 24549/03, 1 March 2005).
• EGMR, 18.03.2008 - 42496/05

  TREIAL v. ESTONIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 13.03.2014 - 16587/10

  To this end, the Court will examine carefully the declaration in the light of the principles emerging from its case-law, in particular the Tahsin Acar judgment (see Tahsin Acar v. Turkey (preliminary issue) [GC], no. 26307/95, §§ 75-77, ECHR 2003-VI; see also Treial v. Estonia (no. 2) (dec.), no. 42496/05, 18 March 2008, and Parfjonov v. Estonia (dec.), no. 6905/09, 29 January 2013).
• EGMR, 05.09.2002 - 77784/01

  NOGOLICA c. CROATIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 13.03.2014 - 16587/10

  In particular, the Court has previously departed from this general rule in cases, for example, against Italy, Croatia and Slovakia concerning remedies against the excessive length of proceedings (see Brusco, cited above; Nogolica v. Croatia (dec.), no. 77784/01, ECHR 2002-VIII; and Andrásik and Others v. Slovakia (dec.), nos.
• EGMR, 22.05.2001 - 33592/96

  BAUMANN v. FRANCE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 13.03.2014 - 16587/10

  However, as it has held on many occasions, this rule is subject to exceptions, which may be justified by the particular circumstances of each case (see Baumann v. France, no. 33592/96, § 47, ECHR 2001-V, and Brusco v. Italy (dec.), no. 69789/01, ECHR 2001-IX).
• EGMR, 09.11.2010 - 5238/07

  AHLSKOG v. FINLAND

  Auszug aus EGMR, 13.03.2014 - 16587/10

  The Court has referred in such context to thousands (Turgut and Others, § 54, and Grzincic, § 104, both cited above) or hundreds of applications (Andrásik and Others and Nogolica, both cited above) or "many" applications (Ahlskog v. Finland (dec.), no. 5238/07, § 76, 9 November 2010) filed against the respective countries.
• EGMR, 23.09.2010 - 26716/09

  FAKHRETDINOV and OTHERS v. RUSSIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 13.03.2014 - 16587/10

  26716/09, 67576/09 and 7698/10, § 16, 23 September 2010; Vokurka v. the Czech Republic ((dec.), no. 40552/02, § 11, 16 October 2007; Grzincic v. Slovenia, no. 26867/02, § 48, ECHR 2007-V (extracts); and Charzynski, cited above, § 20).
• EGMR, 26.03.2013 - 4860/09

  TURGUT ET AUTRES c. TURQUIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 13.03.2014 - 16587/10

  The Court observes that in a number of such instances the legislation introducing new remedies in respect of excessive length of proceedings contained transitional provisions concerning cases in respect of which applications had already been lodged with this Court (see Balakchiev and Others v. Bulgaria (dec.), no. 65187/10, § 22, 18 June 2013; Turgut and Others v. Turkey (dec.), no. 4860/09, § 26, 26 March 2013; Taron v. Germany (dec.), no. 53126/07, § 27, 29 May 2012; Fakhretdinov and Others v. Russia (dec.), nos.
• EGMR, 29.05.2012 - 53126/07

  TARON v. GERMANY
• EGMR, 26.10.2000 - 30210/96

  Das Recht auf Verfahrensbeschleunigung gemäß Art. 6 Abs. 1 S. 1 EMRK in …
• EGMR, 22.10.2002 - 57984/00

  ANDRASIK AND OTHERS v. SLOVAKIA
• EGMR, 03.05.2007 - 26867/02

  GRZINCIC c. SLOVENIE
• EGMR, 06.09.2001 - 69789/01

  BRUSCO v. ITALY
• EGMR, 27.06.2000 - 30979/96

  FRYDLENDER c. FRANCE
• EGMR, 29.01.2013 - 6905/09

  PARFJONOV v. ESTONIA
• EGMR, 01.03.2005 - 15212/03

  CHARZYNSKI c. POLOGNE
• EGMR, 18.06.2013 - 65187/10

  BALAKCHIEV AND OTHERS v. BULGARIA
• EGMR - 10200/04

  [ENG]
• EGMR - 13466/03

  [ENG]
• EGMR - 14163/04

  [ENG]
• EGMR - 19993/04

  [ENG]
• EGMR - 21819/04

  [ENG]
• EGMR, 01.03.2010 - 46113/99

  Demopoulos ./. Türkei und 7 andere