Volltextveröffentlichungen (3)

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  JUHNKE v. TURKEY

  Art. 3, Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 8, Art. 8 Abs. 2, Art. 8 Abs. 1, Art. 29, Art. 29 Abs. 3, Art. 41 MRK
  No violation of Art. 3 Violation of Art. 8 Violation of Art. 6-1 Remainder inadmissible Pecuniary damage - claim dismissed Non-pecuniary damage - award (englisch)

• Österreichisches Institut für Menschenrechte

  (englisch)

• juris(Abodienst) (Volltext/Leitsatz)

Kurzfassungen/Presse

• RIS Bundeskanzleramt Österreich (Ausführliche Zusammenfassung)

Verfahrensgang

• EGMR, 13.05.2008 - 52515/99
• EGMR, 04.07.2018 - 52515/99

Papierfundstellen

• NVwZ 2009, 1547

Wird zitiert von ...Neu Zitiert selbst (9)

• EGMR, 11.07.2006 - 54810/00

  Einsatz von Brechmitteln; Selbstbelastungsfreiheit (Schutzbereich; faires …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 13.05.2008 - 52515/99

  However, any recourse to a forcible medical intervention in order to obtain evidence of a crime must be convincingly justified on the facts of a particular case and the manner in which a person is subjected to a forcible medical procedure must not exceed the minimum level of severity prescribed by the Court's case-law under Article 3 of the Convention (see Jalloh v. Germany [GC], no. 54810/00, §§ 70-71, ECHR 2006-...).
• EGMR, 29.04.2002 - 2346/02

  Vereinbarkeit der strafrechtlichen Verfolgung der Beihilfe zum Selbstmord mit der …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 13.05.2008 - 52515/99

  In this connection, the Court reiterates that a decision imposing a medical intervention in defiance of the subject's will would give rise to an interference with respect for his or her private life, and in particular his or her right to physical integrity (see, mutatis mutandis, Glass v. the United Kingdom, no. 61827/00, § 70, ECHR 2004-II, Pretty v. the United Kingdom, no. 2346/02, §§ 61 and 63, ECHR 2002-III, and Y.F. v. Turkey, cited above, § 33).
• EKMR, 24.01.1968 - 3321/67

  GOVERNMENT OF DENMARK v. THE GOVERNMENT OF GREECE ; GOVERNMENT OF NORWAY v. THE …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 13.05.2008 - 52515/99

  3321/67 et al., Commission's report of 5 November 1969, Yearbook 12, p. 186, and Keenan v. the United Kingdom, no. 27229/95, § 110, ECHR 2001-III).

 
• EGMR, 05.10.2000 - 57834/00

  KABLAN contre la TURQUIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 13.05.2008 - 52515/99

  The relevant domestic law and practice in force at the material time are outlined in the following judgments: Batı and Others v. Turkey (nos. 33097/96 and 57834/00, §§ 96-100, 3 June 2004), Y.F. v. Turkey, (no. 24209/94, §§ 23-26, ECHR 2003-IX), Özel v. Turkey (no. 42739/98, §§ 20-21, 7 November 2002), and Gençel v. Turkey (no. 53431/99, §§ 11 -12, 23 October 2003).
• EGMR, 24.09.1992 - 10533/83

  HERCZEGFALVY c. AUTRICHE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 13.05.2008 - 52515/99

  A measure which is therapeutically necessary from the point of view of established principles of medicine cannot in principle be regarded as inhuman and degrading (see, in particular, Herczegfalvy v. Austria, judgment of 24 September 1992, Series A no. 244, pp. 25-26, § 82, and Gennadi Naoumenko, cited above, § 112).The Court must nevertheless satisfy itself that a medical necessity has been convincingly shown to exist and that procedural guarantees for the intervention, for example to force-feed, exist and are complied with (see Nevmerzhitsky v. Ukraine, no. 54825/00, § 94, 5 April 2005).
• EGMR, 06.04.2000 - 26772/95

  LABITA c. ITALIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 13.05.2008 - 52515/99

  It prohibits in absolute terms torture or inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment, irrespective of the circumstances and the victim's behaviour (see Labita v. Italy [GC], no. 26772/95, § 119, ECHR 2000-IV).
• EGMR, 14.11.2002 - 67263/01

  MOUISEL v. FRANCE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 13.05.2008 - 52515/99

  The assessment of this minimum level is relative; it depends on all the circumstances of the case, such as the duration of the treatment, its physical and mental effects and, in some cases, the sex, age and state of health of the victim (see, among other authorities, Mouisel v. France, no. 67263/01, § 37, ECHR 2002-IX, and Gennadi Naoumenko v. Ukraine, no. 42023/98, § 108, 10 February 2004).
• EGMR, 03.06.2004 - 33097/96

  BATI AND OTHERS v. TURKEY

  Auszug aus EGMR, 13.05.2008 - 52515/99

  The relevant domestic law and practice in force at the material time are outlined in the following judgments: Batı and Others v. Turkey (nos. 33097/96 and 57834/00, §§ 96-100, 3 June 2004), Y.F. v. Turkey, (no. 24209/94, §§ 23-26, ECHR 2003-IX), Özel v. Turkey (no. 42739/98, §§ 20-21, 7 November 2002), and Gençel v. Turkey (no. 53431/99, §§ 11 -12, 23 October 2003).
• EGMR, 27.02.2007 - 56760/00

  AKPINAR AND ALTUN v. TURKEY

  Auszug aus EGMR, 13.05.2008 - 52515/99

  In these circumstances, the Court dismisses the Government's argument and finds that the applicant was not required to embark on another attempt to obtain redress by bringing a civil-law action (see, for example, mutatis mutantis, Akpınar and Altun v. Turkey, no. 56760/00, § 68, ECHR 2007-... (extracts)).

• KG, 11.12.2012 - 7 SchH 5/12

  Anwendbarkeit des ÜberlVfRSchG auf Altverfahren

  Zwar hat auch der EGMR die Frist wiederholt nach den Entscheidungen der Instanzgerichte berechnet (vgl. EGMR NVwZ 1999, 2943, NVwZ 2009, 1547) und dies in seinem Urteil vom 29.6.2012 noch einmal ausdrücklich betont (NJW 2012, 2943 Tz 60).