Rechtsprechung
EGMR, 13.06.2002 - 38361/97 |
Volltextveröffentlichungen (2)
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
ANGUELOVA v. BULGARIA
Art. 2, Art. 2 Abs. 1, Art. 3, Art. 5, Art. 5 Abs. 1, Art. 13, Art. 14, Art. 41 MRK
Violation of Art. 2 in respect of death of applicant's son Violation of Art. 2 in respect of failure to provide timely medical care Violation of Art. 2 due to lack of effective investigation Violation of Art. 3 Violation of Art. 5 Violation of Art. 13 No violation ... - Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
ANGUELOVA c. BULGARIE
Art. 2, Art. 2 Abs. 1, Art. 3, Art. 5, Art. 5 Abs. 1, Art. 13, Art. 14, Art. 41 MRK
Violation de l'art. 2 quant au décès du fils de la requérante Violation de l'art. 2 quant au retard apporté à dispenser des soins médicaux Violation de l'art. 2 en raison de l'absence d'enquête effective Violation de l'art. 3 Violation de l'art. 5 Violation ...
Verfahrensgang
- EGMR, 06.06.2000 - 38361/97
- EGMR, 13.06.2002 - 38361/97
Wird zitiert von ... (204) Neu Zitiert selbst (16)
- EGMR, 18.05.2000 - 41488/98
VELIKOVA c. BULGARIE
Auszug aus EGMR, 13.06.2002 - 38361/97
The object and purpose of the Convention as an instrument for the protection of individual human beings also requires that Article 2 be interpreted and applied so as to make its safeguards practical and effective (see McCann and Others v. the United Kingdom, judgment of 27 September 1995, Series A no. 324, pp. 45-46, §§ 146-47; Salman v. Turkey [GC], no. 21986/93, § 97, ECHR 2000-VII; and Velikova v. Bulgaria, no. 41488/98, ECHR 2000-VI).At the root of this injurious escape from reality lies the evidentiary rule which the Court has inflicted on itself: "The Court recalls... that the standard of proof required under the Convention is 'proof beyond reasonable doubt'." [Velikova v. Bulgaria, no. 41488/98, ECHR 2000-VI] The majority found that in the present case it had not been established "beyond reasonable doubt" that in the death of the 17-year-old Rom, Anguel Zabchekov that followed the devoted attentions of police officers, his ethnicity was "a determining factor" with those police officers who facilitated the young Rom's access to the fastest lane from Razgrad to eternity.
- EGMR, 27.09.1995 - 18984/91
McCANN AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
Auszug aus EGMR, 13.06.2002 - 38361/97
The object and purpose of the Convention as an instrument for the protection of individual human beings also requires that Article 2 be interpreted and applied so as to make its safeguards practical and effective (see McCann and Others v. the United Kingdom, judgment of 27 September 1995, Series A no. 324, pp. 45-46, §§ 146-47; Salman v. Turkey [GC], no. 21986/93, § 97, ECHR 2000-VII; and Velikova v. Bulgaria, no. 41488/98, ECHR 2000-VI).The Court has also, by an admirable process of judicial activism "created" the concept of a "procedural violation" of Article 2 [McCann and Others v. the United Kingdom, judgment of 27 September 1995, Series A no. 324], and, more recently, of Article 3 [Assenov and Others, cited above].
- EGMR, 13.06.2000 - 23531/94
TIMURTAS c. TURQUIE
Auszug aus EGMR, 13.06.2002 - 38361/97
Thus also the Court, in a forward-looking decision, has held that the failure by the Government to submit information to which only it could have access, may give rise to inferences that the applicant's charges are well-founded [Timurtas v. Turkey, no. 23531/94, ECHR 2000-VI, and Tas v. Turkey, no. 24396/94, 14 November 2000].
- EGMR, 14.11.2000 - 24396/94
TAS v. TURKEY
Auszug aus EGMR, 13.06.2002 - 38361/97
Thus also the Court, in a forward-looking decision, has held that the failure by the Government to submit information to which only it could have access, may give rise to inferences that the applicant's charges are well-founded [Timurtas v. Turkey, no. 23531/94, ECHR 2000-VI, and Tas v. Turkey, no. 24396/94, 14 November 2000]. - EGMR, 10.05.2001 - 28945/95
T.P. ET K.M. c. ROYAUME-UNI
Auszug aus EGMR, 13.06.2002 - 38361/97
Furthermore, in appropriate cases, compensation for the pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage flowing from the breach should in principle be available as part of the range of redress (see, as a recent authority, T.P. and K.M. v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 28945/95, § 107, ECHR 2001-V). - EGMR, 05.02.2002 - 51564/99
Belgien, EMRK, Europäische Menschenrechtskonvention, Abschiebunghaft, Freiheit …
Auszug aus EGMR, 13.06.2002 - 38361/97
Reliance on inferences, legal presumptions and a shift in the onus of evidence also proved decisive in the recent Conka case, in which the Court, rather than requiring from the applicants proof beyond reasonable doubt that their expulsion was in pursuance of a collective expulsion policy, found a violation by starting from the opposite end of the syllogism: "The procedure followed [by the State authorities] did not enable it [the Court] to eliminate all doubt that the expulsion might have been collective" [Conka v. Belgium, no. 51564/99, ECHR 2002-I]. - EGMR, 13.05.1980 - 6694/74
ARTICO c. ITALIE
Auszug aus EGMR, 13.06.2002 - 38361/97
The Convention has to be applied by the Court in such a way as to guarantee "not rights that are theoretical or illusory, but rights that are practical and effective" [Artico v. Italy, judgment of 13 May 1980, Series A no. 37]. - EGMR, 08.07.1999 - 23763/94
TANRIKULU c. TURQUIE
Auszug aus EGMR, 13.06.2002 - 38361/97
The authorities must have taken the reasonable steps available to them to secure the evidence concerning the incident, including, inter alia, eyewitness testimony, forensic evidence and, where appropriate, an autopsy which provides a complete and accurate record of injury and an objective analysis of clinical findings, including the cause of death (see, for example, concerning autopsies, Salman, cited above, § 106; concerning witnesses, Tanrıkulu v. Turkey [GC], no. 23763/94, § 109, ECHR 1999-IV; concerning forensic evidence, Gül v. Turkey, no. 22676/93, § 89, 14 December 2000). - EGMR, 28.03.2000 - 22535/93
MAHMUT KAYA v. TURKEY
Auszug aus EGMR, 13.06.2002 - 38361/97
The Court does not deem it necessary to make a separate finding under Article 3 in respect of the deficiencies in the investigation (see Mahmut Kaya v. Turkey, no. 22535/93, § 120, ECHR 2000-III), having already dealt with that question under Article 2 of the Convention (see paragraphs 132-46 above). - EGMR, 14.12.2000 - 22676/93
GÜL v. TURKEY
Auszug aus EGMR, 13.06.2002 - 38361/97
The authorities must have taken the reasonable steps available to them to secure the evidence concerning the incident, including, inter alia, eyewitness testimony, forensic evidence and, where appropriate, an autopsy which provides a complete and accurate record of injury and an objective analysis of clinical findings, including the cause of death (see, for example, concerning autopsies, Salman, cited above, § 106; concerning witnesses, Tanrıkulu v. Turkey [GC], no. 23763/94, § 109, ECHR 1999-IV; concerning forensic evidence, Gül v. Turkey, no. 22676/93, § 89, 14 December 2000). - EGMR, 04.05.2001 - 28883/95
McKERR c. ROYAUME-UNI
- EGMR, 27.06.2000 - 21986/93
Verursachung des Todes eines Gefangenen in türkischer Haft - Umfang der …
- EGMR, 20.05.1999 - 21594/93
Verursachung des Todes eines türkischen Staatsangehörigen durch türkische …
- EGMR, 08.07.1999 - 23657/94
ÇAKICI v. TURKEY
- EGMR, 27.06.2000 - 22277/93
ILHAN c. TURQUIE
- EGMR, 28.07.1999 - 25803/94
Zur "Einzelfallprüfung" und "geltungszeitlichen Interpretation" im Rahmen des …
- EGMR, 13.11.2007 - 57325/00
D.H. AND OTHERS v. THE CZECH REPUBLIC
En 2002, 1e juge Bonello trouvait « particulièrement perturbant que la Cour, en cinquante ans et plus de travail judiciaire opiniâtre, n'ait pas encore trouvé à ce jour un seul exemple de violation du droit [garanti par l'article 2 ou par l'article 3] fondée sur la race (...)'(Anguelova c. Bulgarie, no 38361/97, CEDH 2002-IV, opinion dissidente). - EGMR, 09.06.2009 - 33401/02
Opuz ./. Türkei
En effet, dans certaines circonstances, lorsque les événements en cause, dans leur totalité ou pour une large part, sont connus exclusivement des autorités, la charge de la preuve pèse selon la Cour sur les autorités, qui doivent fournir une explication satisfaisante et convaincante (Salman c. Turquie [GC], no 21986/93, § 100, CEDH 2000-VII ; Anguelova c. Bulgarie, no 38361/97, § 111, CEDH 2002-IV). - EGMR, 20.12.2004 - 50385/99
MAKARATZIS c. GRECE
The essential purpose of such an investigation is to secure the effective implementation of the domestic laws safeguarding the right to life and, in those cases involving State agents or bodies, to ensure their accountability for deaths occurring under their responsibility (see Anguelova v. Bulgaria, no. 38361/97, § 137, ECHR 2002-IV).
- EGMR, 24.07.2014 - 28761/11
Polen zahlt Schmerzensgeld für Haft in CIA-Gefängnis
For the same reasons, there must be a sufficient element of public scrutiny of the investigation or its results to secure accountability in practice as well as in theory (see Anguelova v. Bulgaria, no. 38361/97, § 140, ECHR 2002-IV; Al-Skeini and Others, cited above, § 167 and El-Masri, cited above, §§ 191-192). - EGMR, 15.12.2016 - 16483/12
Lampedusa-Haft war illegal
The lack of a proper record of an individual's arrest and detention is thus sufficient for the Court to find that there has been a violation of Article 5 § 1 (see Anguelova v. Bulgaria, no. 38361/97, § 157, ECHR 2002-IV, and Menesheva, cited above, §§ 87-89). - EGMR, 06.07.2005 - 43577/98
NATCHOVA ET AUTRES c. BULGARIE
The essential purpose of such an investigation is to secure the effective implementation of the domestic laws safeguarding the right to life and, in those cases involving State agents or bodies, to ensure their accountability for deaths occurring under their responsibility (see Anguelova v. Bulgaria, no. 38361/97, § 137, ECHR 2002-IV). - EGMR, 31.05.2018 - 33234/12
Litauen und Rumänien mitverantwortlich für CIA-Folter
Where an individual has an arguable claim that he has been ill-treated by agents of the State, the notion of an "effective remedy" entails, in addition to the payment of compensation where appropriate, a procedure enabling a thorough and effective investigation capable of leading to the identification and punishment of those responsible and including effective access for the complainant to the investigatory procedure (see Anguelova v. Bulgaria, no. 38361/97, §§ 161-162, ECHR 2002; Assenov and Others, cited above, §§ 114 et seq.; Aksoy, cited above, §§ 95 and 98; and El-Masri, cited above, § 255).Anguelova v. Bulgaria, no. 38361/97, ECHR 2002 IV.
- EGMR, 24.07.2014 - 7511/13
Polen zahlt Schmerzensgeld für Haft in CIA-Gefängnis
For the same reasons, there must be a sufficient element of public scrutiny of the investigation or its results to secure accountability in practice as well as in theory (see Anguelova v. Bulgaria, no. 38361/97, § 140, ECHR 2002-IV; Al-Skeini and Others, cited above, § 167 and El-Masri, cited above, §§ 191-192). - EGMR, 31.05.2018 - 46454/11
Litauen und Rumänien mitverantwortlich für CIA-Folter
Where an individual has an arguable claim that he has been ill-treated by agents of the State, the notion of an "effective remedy" entails, in addition to the payment of compensation where appropriate, a procedure enabling a thorough and effective investigation capable of leading to the identification and punishment of those responsible and including effective access for the complainant to the investigatory procedure (see Anguelova v. Bulgaria, no. 38361/97, §§ 161-162, ECHR 2002 IV; Assenov and Others, cited above, §§ 114 et seq.; Aksoy, cited above, §§ 95 and 98; and El-Masri, cited above, § 255).Anguelova v. Bulgaria, no. 38361/97, ECHR 2002 IV.
- EGMR, 15.03.2012 - 4149/04
AKSU c. TURQUIE
In that respect I agree with the partly dissenting opinion of Judge Giovanni Bonello in Anguelova v. Bulgaria (no. 38361/97, ECHR 2002-IV), in which he stated:. - EGMR, 26.02.2004 - 43577/98
NACHOVA AND OTHERS v. BULGARIA
- EGMR, 04.12.2014 - 76204/11
NAVALNYY AND YASHIN v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 12.05.2017 - 21980/04
SIMEONOVI c. BULGARIE
- EGMR, 13.07.2010 - 45661/99
CARABULEA v. ROMANIA
- EGMR, 30.01.2024 - 919/20
GÜLMEZ ET AUTRES c. TÜRKIYE
- EGMR, 21.04.2015 - 42139/12
PISARI v. THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA AND RUSSIA
- EGMR, 06.10.2005 - 40262/98
H.Y. ET HÜ.Y. c. TURQUIE
- EGMR, 17.12.2009 - 32704/04
DENIS VASILYEV v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 16.11.2006 - 52955/99
HUYLU c. TURQUIE
- EGMR, 16.11.2017 - 72126/14
CEESAY v. AUSTRIA
- EGMR, 14.04.2015 - 24014/05
MUSTAFA TUNÇ ET FECIRE TUNÇ c. TURQUIE
- EGMR, 12.06.2014 - 57856/11
JELIC v. CROATIA
- EGMR, 18.12.2012 - 2944/06
ASLAKHANOVA AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 20.07.2004 - 47940/99
BALOGH v. HUNGARY
- EGMR, 03.03.2015 - 29263/12
S.Z. c. BULGARIE
- EGMR, 27.01.2015 - 24109/07
ASIYE GENÇ c. TURQUIE
- EGMR, 05.03.2013 - 44084/10
GÜLAY ÇETIN c. TURQUIE
- EGMR, 16.02.2012 - 23944/04
EREMIASOVA AND PECHOVA v. THE CZECH REPUBLIC
- EGMR, 21.12.2010 - 45744/08
JASINSKIS v. LATVIA
- EGMR, 20.12.2007 - 7888/03
NIKOLOVA AND VELICHKOVA v. BULGARIA
- EGMR, 05.09.2017 - 37795/13
TEKIN ET ARSLAN c. BELGIQUE
- EGMR, 01.07.2014 - 77938/11
DIMITROV AND OTHERS v. BULGARIA
- EGMR, 15.04.2014 - 7524/06
CÜLAZ ET AUTRES c. TURQUIE
- EGMR, 26.05.2020 - 17247/13
MAKUCHYAN AND MINASYAN v. AZERBAIJAN AND HUNGARY
- EGMR, 21.06.2018 - 36083/16
SEMACHE c. FRANCE
- EGMR, 10.12.2013 - 13660/05
TEKÇI ET AUTRES c. TURQUIE
- EGMR, 16.07.2013 - 43098/09
McCAUGHEY AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
- EGMR, 04.12.2012 - 41452/07
LENEV v. BULGARIA
- EGMR, 01.12.2009 - 64301/01
VELCEA ET MAZARE c. ROUMANIE
- EGMR, 26.07.2007 - 55523/00
ANGELOVA AND ILIEV v. BULGARIA
- EGMR, 05.04.2022 - 69517/11
NANA MURADYAN v. ARMENIA
- EGMR, 17.01.2017 - 24359/10
ÖNKOL c. TURQUIE
- EGMR, 09.12.2014 - 44814/07
KADRI BUDAK c. TURQUIE
- EGMR, 05.11.2009 - 1108/02
KOLEVI v. BULGARIA
- EGMR, 15.05.2008 - 7178/03
DEDOVSKIY AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 23.10.2012 - 24604/04
NIHAYET ARICI ET AUTRES c. TURQUIE
- EGMR, 01.06.2006 - 39922/03
TAÏS c. FRANCE
- EGMR, 22.02.2022 - 45801/19
TUNÇ c. TURQUIE
- EGMR, 20.09.2016 - 26470/10
GÜZELAYDIN c. TURQUIE
- EGMR, 13.10.2015 - 25690/08
TAS c. TURQUIE
- EGMR, 02.09.2010 - 71420/01
BEKIRSKI v. BULGARIA
- EGMR, 23.04.2009 - 3179/05
GAKIYEV AND GAKIYEVA v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 04.07.2023 - 4904/20
AL c. TÜRKIYE
- EGMR, 17.09.2020 - 62439/12
KOTILAINEN AND OTHERS v. FINLAND
- EGMR, 31.01.2017 - 37588/12
ETGÜ c. TURQUIE
- EGMR, 30.08.2016 - 31420/11
ÖNAL c. TURQUIE
- EGMR, 28.06.2016 - 21733/12
CERAN c. TURQUIE
- EGMR, 17.03.2015 - 34160/09
DOBRE ET AUTRES c. ROUMANIE
- EGMR, 09.12.2014 - 61020/11
TANER c. TURQUIE
- EGMR, 15.07.2014 - 40485/08
PETROVIC v. SERBIA
- EGMR, 16.07.2013 - 58559/09
HEMSWORTH v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
- EGMR, 17.09.2009 - 35052/04
ZABIYEVA AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 23.09.2004 - 47877/99
RACHEVI v. BULGARIA
- EGMR, 02.04.2019 - 49428/12
BAYRAM c. TURQUIE
- EGMR, 17.01.2017 - 8516/08
BARAKHOYEV v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 06.09.2016 - 72152/13
CINDRIC AND BESLIC v. CROATIA
- EGMR, 26.03.2013 - 10425/09
ACATRINEI ET AUTRES c. ROUMANIE
- EGMR, 02.10.2008 - 1748/02
BELOUSOV v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 09.06.2005 - 42908/98
KIRILOVA AND OTHERS v. BULGARIA
- EGMR, 28.11.2017 - 55089/13
DORNEANU c. ROUMANIE
- EGMR, 27.01.2015 - 7309/04
VEFA SERDAR c. TURQUIE
- EGMR, 22.04.2014 - 22741/06
GAVRILITA c. RÉPUBLIQUE DE MOLDOVA
- EGMR, 25.06.2013 - 24014/05
MUSTAFA TUNÇ ET FECIRE TUNÇ c. TURQUIE
- EGMR, 18.06.2013 - 14326/11
BANEL v. LITHUANIA
- EGMR, 05.06.2012 - 27026/10
BUNTOV v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 17.07.2008 - 48913/99
YÜREKLI c. TURQUIE
- EGMR, 05.06.2007 - 63758/00
ANIK AND OTHERS v. TURKEY
- EGMR, 12.04.2007 - 52435/99
IVANOVA c. BULGARIE
- EGMR, 30.09.2004 - 39609/98
MANCHEVA v. BULGARIA
- EGMR, 08.11.2022 - 2169/12
HOVHANNISYAN AND NAZARYAN v. ARMENIA
- EGMR, 21.12.2017 - 17249/10
GJIKONDI ET AUTRES c. GRÈCE
- EGMR, 16.11.2017 - 73974/14
TSALIKIDIS AND OTHERS v. GREECE
- EGMR, 27.01.2015 - 56838/08
ALECU ET AUTRES c. ROUMANIE
- EGMR, 16.01.2014 - 5269/08
SHCHIBORSHCH AND KUZMINA v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 15.10.2013 - 70077/11
TIMUS AND TARUS v. THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA
- EGMR, 17.09.2013 - 22426/11
PRZEMYK v. POLAND
- EGMR, 30.10.2012 - 32520/09
GHIMP AND OTHERS v. THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA
- EGMR, 25.01.2011 - 26246/05
IORGA ET AUTRES c. ROUMANIE
- EGMR, 17.12.2009 - 4762/05
MIKAYIL MAMMADOV v. AZERBAIJAN
- EGMR, 08.01.2009 - 43326/05
LEONIDIS v. GREECE
- EGMR, 17.07.2008 - 28433/02
CAMDERELI v. TURKEY
- EGMR, 08.04.2008 - 42942/02
ALI AND AYSE DURAN v. TURKEY
- EGMR, 26.09.2006 - 35349/05
FLERI SOLER ET CAMILLERI c. MALTE
- EGMR, 19.05.2004 - 42027/98
TOTEVA v. BULGARIA
- EGMR, 14.09.2023 - 2264/12
AINIS AND OTHERS v. ITALY
- EGMR, 22.03.2022 - 13472/18
COSOVAN v. THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA
- EGMR, 02.04.2020 - 8938/07
KUKHALASHVILI AND OTHERS v. GEORGIA
- EGMR, 20.02.2020 - 58717/10
NASIROV AND OTHERS v. AZERBAIJAN
- EGMR, 14.01.2020 - 30878/16
SOARES CAMPOS c. PORTUGAL
- EGMR, 25.01.2018 - 38766/15
MILIC AND OTHERS v. CROATIA
- EGMR, 01.06.2017 - 30500/11
MALIK BABAYEV v. AZERBAIJAN
- EGMR, 24.11.2016 - 11275/07
MURADYAN v. ARMENIA
- EGMR, 14.06.2016 - 61808/08
GÜVENER c. TURQUIE
- EGMR, 22.10.2015 - 42883/11
KHALIKOVA v. AZERBAIJAN
- EGMR, 28.04.2015 - 34902/10
SULTAN DÖLEK ET AUTRES c. TURQUIE
- EGMR, 17.10.2013 - 26824/04
KELLER v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 03.09.2013 - 30677/10
DURDU c. TURQUIE
- EGMR, 05.06.2012 - 23038/07
ÜLÜFER c. TURQUIE
- EGMR, 05.04.2012 - 8968/08
JIRSÁK v. THE CZECH REPUBLIC
- EGMR, 10.01.2012 - 13462/06
CESNULEVICIUS v. LITHUANIA
- EGMR, 08.06.2010 - 6458/03
WOLF-SORG c. TURQUIE
- EGMR, 24.03.2009 - 11818/02
MOJSIEJEW v. POLAND
- EGMR, 13.01.2009 - 33750/03
YETER v. TURKEY
- EGMR, 09.10.2007 - 9375/02
SAOUD c. FRANCE
- EGMR, 21.06.2007 - 27850/03
KARAGIANNOPOULOS c. GRECE
- EGMR, 12.06.2007 - 50939/99
BAKAN c. TURQUIE
- EGMR, 25.04.2006 - 19807/92
ERDOGAN AND OTHERS v. TURKEY
- EGMR, 22.11.2005 - 38595/97
KAKOULLI v. TURKEY
- EGMR, 03.03.2005 - 52391/99
RAMSAHAI AND OTHERS v. THE NETHERLANDS
- EGMR, 17.01.2023 - 84523/17
DARAIBOU v. CROATIA
- EGMR, 08.07.2021 - 1172/12
MAMMADOV AND ABBASOV v. AZERBAIJAN
- EGMR, 16.03.2021 - 84271/17
MOROSANU AND OTHERS v. ROMANIA
- EGMR, 23.06.2020 - 688/11
GAYEVA v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 18.07.2019 - 50375/07
VAZAGASHVILI AND SHANAVA v. GEORGIA
- EGMR, 06.07.2017 - 80960/12
ZDJELAR AND OTHERS v. CROATIA
- EGMR, 04.07.2017 - 39468/13
OBAJDIN v. CROATIA
- EGMR, 04.05.2017 - 47095/09
MUSTAFAYEV v. AZERBAIJAN
- EGMR, 31.05.2016 - 11167/12
BAKANOVA v. LITHUANIA
- EGMR, 29.03.2016 - 60304/09
DEMIR c. TURQUIE
- EGMR, 16.02.2016 - 35152/09
DALAKOV v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 27.10.2015 - 23551/10
ÖZPOLAT ET AUTRES c. TURQUIE
- EGMR, 18.06.2015 - 41675/08
FANZIYEVA v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 23.04.2015 - 16499/09
NAGIYEV v. AZERBAIJAN
- EGMR, 19.02.2015 - 66953/09
MILEUSNIC ET MILEUSNIC-ESPENHEIM c. CROATIE
- EGMR, 05.02.2013 - 43174/10
ANDREY GORBUNOV v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 03.05.2012 - 16850/09
YELDEN ET AUTRES c. TURQUIE
- EGMR, 14.06.2011 - 19776/04
CIECHONSKA v. POLAND
- EGMR, 29.03.2011 - 47357/08
ALIKAJ ET AUTRES c. ITALIE
- EGMR, 15.02.2011 - 35403/06
TSINTSABADZE v. GEORGIA
- EGMR, 25.11.2010 - 30271/03
IVAN KUZMIN v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 04.11.2010 - 20364/05
ALEKSANDR SOKOLOV v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 07.10.2010 - 12773/03
PANKOV v. BULGARIA
- EGMR, 27.04.2010 - 23039/02
WEBER ET AUTRES c. POLOGNE
- EGMR, 20.05.2008 - 45902/99
KASA v. TURKEY
- EGMR, 28.09.2006 - 55956/00
VATEVI v. BULGARIA
- EGMR, 28.09.2006 - 60939/00
KARCHEVA AND SHTARBOVA v. BULGARIA
- EGMR, 02.05.2006 - 54182/00
HALIT CELEBI c. TURQUIE
- EGMR, 10.01.2006 - 49391/99
GÜLER c. TURQUIE
- EGMR, 18.01.2005 - 39832/98
TODOROV v. BULGARIA
- EGMR, 03.04.2003 - 42027/98
TOTEVA v. BULGARIA
- EGMR, 09.09.2021 - 30133/12
HASANOV v. AZERBAIJAN
- EGMR, 17.11.2020 - 27628/18
SHCHERBAKOVA v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 10.09.2020 - 69460/12
SHURIYYA ZEYNALOV v. AZERBAIJAN
- EGMR, 07.05.2020 - 43881/10
VARDOSANIDZE v. GEORGIA
- EGMR, 19.03.2020 - 22004/11
SATULLAYEV v. AZERBAIJAN
- EGMR, 05.03.2019 - 27328/11
AKÇAY c. TURQUIE
- EGMR, 21.02.2019 - 35432/07
MAMMADOV AND OTHERS v. AZERBAIJAN
- EGMR, 05.06.2018 - 889/15
SIDEA AND OTHERS v. ROMANIA
- EGMR, 12.07.2016 - 11059/12
ALIYEV AND GADZHIYEVA v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 12.04.2016 - 43626/13
ECATERINA MIREA AND OTHERS v. ROMANIA
- EGMR, 18.06.2015 - 71593/11
B. AND OTHERS v. CROATIA
- EGMR, 25.11.2014 - 72825/10
ILÇIN c. TURQUIE
- EGMR, 30.04.2014 - 13596/05
TIKHONOVA v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 01.04.2014 - 10449/06
MEHMET KÖSE c. TURQUIE
- EGMR, 15.10.2013 - 20070/08
HÜSEYIN KAPLAN c. TURQUIE
- EGMR, 11.12.2012 - 10645/08
VENSKUTE v. LITHUANIA
- EGMR, 10.05.2012 - 33498/04
PUTINTSEVA v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 10.01.2012 - 28102/02
WALASZEK v. POLAND
- EGMR, 30.08.2011 - 36768/09
SARISSKA v. SLOVAKIA
- EGMR, 21.06.2011 - 43368/04
ISAYEV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 07.06.2011 - 42344/07
PREDICA v. ROMANIA
- EGMR, 22.06.2010 - 6414/02
KOSEVA v. BULGARIA
- EGMR, 17.12.2009 - 1062/03
GOLUBEVA v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 24.02.2009 - 63258/00
GAGIU c. ROUMANIE
- EGMR, 09.12.2008 - 77766/01
DZIECIAK v. POLAND
- EGMR, 06.11.2008 - 73281/01
GOULOUB ATANASSOV c. BULGARIE
- EGMR, 28.11.2006 - 13893/02
GOLIK v. POLAND
- EGMR, 10.08.2006 - 56793/00
BABICHKIN v. BULGARIA
- EGMR, 23.02.2006 - 46317/99
OGNYANOVA AND CHOBAN v. BULGARIA
- EGMR, 08.04.2003 - 57671/00
SLIMANI contre la FRANCE
- EGMR, 16.10.2018 - 30462/15
MATEESCU v. ROMANIA
- EGMR, 05.06.2018 - 43903/13
IORDAN v. ROMANIA
- EGMR, 07.11.2017 - 43629/13
ANAMARIA-LOREDANA ORASANU AND OTHERS v. ROMANIA
- EGMR, 05.10.2017 - 34197/15
MITEV v. BULGARIA
- EGMR, 18.07.2017 - 25114/11
NINA KUTSENKO v. UKRAINE
- EGMR, 06.07.2017 - 12986/13
TRIVKANOVIC v. CROATIA
- EGMR, 02.05.2017 - 50175/12
M. AND OTHERS v. CROATIA
- EGMR, 09.04.2015 - 29823/13
NJEZIC AND STIMAC v. CROATIA
- EGMR, 17.02.2015 - 49044/12
KONOPACKA v. POLAND
- EGMR, 17.02.2015 - 43696/14
KALUZNA v. POLAND
- EGMR, 04.11.2014 - 50504/09
CICHON v. POLAND
- EGMR, 08.07.2010 - 2747/02
VACHKOVI v. BULGARIA
- EGMR, 12.06.2007 - 75632/01
EKREM c. TURQUIE
- EGMR, 07.06.2007 - 52697/99
MIKADZÉ c. RUSSIE
- EGMR, 19.09.2006 - 32597/96
HALIT DINÇ ET AUTRES c. TURQUIE
- EGMR, 14.02.2006 - 52435/99
IVANOVA v. BULGARIA
- EGMR, 05.03.2019 - 1792/12
YILMAZ c. TURQUIE
- EGMR, 30.10.2018 - 74269/16
PICU AND OTHERS v. ROMANIA
- EGMR, 03.10.2017 - 26107/13
KRAMARENKO v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 04.04.2017 - 70273/11
BOROJEVIC AND OTHERS v. CROATIA
- EGMR, 21.04.2009 - 70787/01
RADUCU c. ROUMANIE
- EGMR, 14.10.2008 - 28226/02
GÜLEN v. TURKEY
- EGMR, 21.12.2006 - 68263/01
GÜZEL SAHIN AUTRES c. TURQUIE
- EGMR, 11.12.2007 - 970/04
SULTANA v. MALTA