Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 13.06.2006 - 21302/02 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2006,69582) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
MUCKOVA v. SLOVAKIA
Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 13, Art. 29, Art. 29 Abs. 3, Art. 35, Art. 35 Abs. 1, Art. 41 MRK
Violation of Art. 6-1 (inadequate reasoning) Not necessary to examine Art. 6-1 (alleged lack of access to court) Violation of Art. 6-1 (length) Violation of Art. 13 Remainder inadmissible Non-pecuniary damage - financial award (englisch)
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (3)
- EGMR, 27.06.2000 - 30979/96
FRYDLENDER c. FRANCE
Auszug aus EGMR, 13.06.2006 - 21302/02
The Court reiterates that the reasonableness of the length of proceedings must be assessed in the light of the circumstances of the case and with reference to the following criteria: the complexity of the case, the conduct of the applicant and the relevant authorities and what was at stake for the applicant in the dispute (see, among many other authorities, Frydlender v. France [GC], no. 30979/96, § 43, ECHR 2000-VII). - EGMR, 03.12.2002 - 48221/99
BERGER v. FRANCE
Auszug aus EGMR, 13.06.2006 - 21302/02
However, these limitations must not restrict or reduce a person's access in such a way or to such an extent that the very essence of the right is impaired; lastly, such limitations will not be compatible with Article 6 § 1 if they do not pursue a legitimate aim or if there is not a reasonable relationship of proportionality between the means employed and the aim sought to be achieved (see, among other authorities, Berger v. France, no. 48221/99, § 30, ECHR 2002-X (extracts), with further references). - EGMR, 27.04.1988 - 9659/82
BOYLE AND RICE v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
Auszug aus EGMR, 13.06.2006 - 21302/02
As regards the alleged absence of an effective remedy in respect of the remaining complaint under Article 6 § 1, the Court recalls that Article 13 applies only where an individual has an "arguable claim" to be the victim of a violation of a Convention right (see Boyle and Rice v. the United Kingdom, judgment of 27 April 1988, Series A no. 131, § 52).