Rechtsprechung
EGMR, 13.06.2006 - 33866/96 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2006,57072) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
BOGULAK v. POLAND
Art. 5, Art. 5 Abs. 3, Art. 5 Abs. 4, Art. 41 MRK
Violation of Art. 5-3 Violation of Art. 5-4 Pecuniary damage - claim dismissed Non-pecuniary damage - financial award Costs and expenses (Convention proceedings) - claim dismissed ...
Verfahrensgang
- EGMR, 11.12.2001 - 33866/96
- EGMR, 19.10.2004 - 33866/96
- EGMR, 28.06.2005 - 33866/96
- EGMR, 13.06.2006 - 33866/96
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (2)
- EGMR, 21.10.1986 - 9862/82
SANCHEZ-REISSE c. SUISSE
Auszug aus EGMR, 13.06.2006 - 33866/96
As regards the claim for alleged damage suffered as a result of violation of Article 5 §§ 3 and 4 of the Convention, the Court recalls that in certain cases which concerned violations of Article 5 §§ 3 and 4 it has made modest awards in respect of non-pecuniary damage (Sanchez-Reisse v. Switzerland, judgment of 21 October 1986, Series A no. 107, § 63; Niedbala v. Poland, cited above, §§ 88-89; M.B. v. Poland, no. 34091/98, § 72, 27 April 2004). - EGMR, 23.10.1990 - 12794/87
HUBER c. SUISSE
Auszug aus EGMR, 13.06.2006 - 33866/96
In other cases, it has declined to make any such award (Huber v. Switzerland judgment of 23 October 1990, Series A no. 188, p. 19, § 46; Wesolowski v. Poland, no. 29687/96, §§ 72-74, 22 June 2004; Dacewicz v. Poland, no. 34611/97, §§ 27-28, 2 July 2002).