Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 13.06.2019 - 63696/12 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2019,15777) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
JARMUZ v. POLAND
Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Criminal proceedings;Article 6-1 - Reasonable time) (englisch)
Verfahrensgang
- EGMR, 13.06.2019 - 63696/12
- EGMR, 04.06.2020 - 63696/12
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (5)
- EGMR, 07.07.2015 - 72287/10
RUTKOWSKI AND OTHERS v. POLAND
Auszug aus EGMR, 13.06.2019 - 63696/12
A detailed description of the relevant domestic law and practice concerning remedies for excessive length of judicial proceedings - in particular, the applicable provisions of the 2004 Act - is set out in the Court's decisions in the cases of Charzynski v. Poland ((dec.), no. 15212/03, §§ 12-23, ECHR 2005-V) and Ratajczyk v. Poland ((dec.), no. 11215/02, ECHR 2005-VIII), and in its judgments in the cases of Krasuski v. Poland (no. 61444/00, §§ 34-46, ECHR 2005-V (extracts)) and Rutkowski and Others v. Poland (nos. 72287/10 and 2 others, §§ 75-107, 7 July 2015).In addition, the Government made a declaration as to general measures to be adopted in the implementation of the Rutkowski and Others v. Poland pilot judgment (no. 72287/10 and 2 others, 7 July 2015 - see Zaluska and Rogalska v. Poland (dec.), nos.
- EGMR, 21.09.2004 - 10675/02
KUSMIEREK v. POLAND
Auszug aus EGMR, 13.06.2019 - 63696/12
The Court reiterates that the reasonableness of the length of proceedings must be assessed in the light of the circumstances of the case and with reference to the following criteria: the complexity of the case, the conduct of the applicant and the conduct of the relevant authorities (see, among many other authorities, Pélissier and Sassi v. France [GC], no. 25444/94, § 67, ECHR 1999-II, and Ku?›mierek v. Poland, no. 10675/02, § 62, 21 September 2004). - EGMR, 18.09.2007 - 28953/03
SULWINSKA v. POLAND
Auszug aus EGMR, 13.06.2019 - 63696/12
To this end, the Court has examined the declarations in the light of the principles emerging from its case-law, in particular the Tahsin Acar judgment (see Tahsin Acar v. Turkey (preliminary issue) [GC], no. 26307/95, §§ 75-77, ECHR 2003-VI; WAZA Sp. z o.o. v. Poland (dec.), no. 11602/02, 26 June 2007; and Sulwinska v. Poland (dec.), no. 28953/03, 18 September 2007). - EGMR, 25.03.1999 - 25444/94
PÉLISSIER AND SASSI v. FRANCE
Auszug aus EGMR, 13.06.2019 - 63696/12
The Court reiterates that the reasonableness of the length of proceedings must be assessed in the light of the circumstances of the case and with reference to the following criteria: the complexity of the case, the conduct of the applicant and the conduct of the relevant authorities (see, among many other authorities, Pélissier and Sassi v. France [GC], no. 25444/94, § 67, ECHR 1999-II, and Ku?›mierek v. Poland, no. 10675/02, § 62, 21 September 2004). - EGMR, 01.03.2005 - 15212/03
CHARZYNSKI c. POLOGNE
Auszug aus EGMR, 13.06.2019 - 63696/12
A detailed description of the relevant domestic law and practice concerning remedies for excessive length of judicial proceedings - in particular, the applicable provisions of the 2004 Act - is set out in the Court's decisions in the cases of Charzynski v. Poland ((dec.), no. 15212/03, §§ 12-23, ECHR 2005-V) and Ratajczyk v. Poland ((dec.), no. 11215/02, ECHR 2005-VIII), and in its judgments in the cases of Krasuski v. Poland (no. 61444/00, §§ 34-46, ECHR 2005-V (extracts)) and Rutkowski and Others v. Poland (nos. 72287/10 and 2 others, §§ 75-107, 7 July 2015).