Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 13.07.2006 - 74463/01 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2006,51120) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
BAHÇEYAKA v. TURKEY
Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 13, Art. 29, Art. 29 Abs. 3, Art. 41, Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1, Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1 Abs. 1 MRK
Violation of Art. 6-1 Violation of Art. 13 Remainder inadmissible Pecuniary damage - claim dismissed Non-pecuniary damage - financial award Costs and expenses partial award - domestic and Convention proceedings (englisch)
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (3)
- EGMR, 25.01.2000 - 37683/97
IAN EDGAR (LIVERPOOL) LIMITED contre le ROYAUME-UNI
Auszug aus EGMR, 13.07.2006 - 74463/01
As to the applicant's complaint under Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 the Court reiterates that the future income constitutes a "possession" only if the income has been earned or where an enforceable claim to it exists (see Ian Edgar (Liverpool) Ltd v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 37683/97, ECHR 2000-I, p. 475; Alfredo Casotti and Others v. Italy, no. 24877/94, Commission decision of 16 October 1996, Decisions and Reports (DR) 87-A, p. 63; Storksen v. Norway, no. 19819/92, Commission decision of 5 July 1994, DR 78-A, p. 89). - EGMR, 27.06.2000 - 30979/96
FRYDLENDER c. FRANCE
Auszug aus EGMR, 13.07.2006 - 74463/01
The Court reiterates that the reasonableness of the length of proceedings must be assessed in the light of the circumstances of the case and with reference to the following criteria: the complexity of the case, the conduct of the applicant and the relevant authorities and what was at stake for the applicant in the dispute (see Frydlender v. France [GC], no. 30979/96, § 43, ECHR 2000-VII). - EKMR, 16.10.1996 - 24877/94
CASOTTI ET AUTRES c. ITALIE
Auszug aus EGMR, 13.07.2006 - 74463/01
As to the applicant's complaint under Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 the Court reiterates that the future income constitutes a "possession" only if the income has been earned or where an enforceable claim to it exists (see Ian Edgar (Liverpool) Ltd v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 37683/97, ECHR 2000-I, p. 475; Alfredo Casotti and Others v. Italy, no. 24877/94, Commission decision of 16 October 1996, Decisions and Reports (DR) 87-A, p. 63; Storksen v. Norway, no. 19819/92, Commission decision of 5 July 1994, DR 78-A, p. 89).