Rechtsprechung
   EGMR, 13.07.2010 - 45661/99   

Zitiervorschläge
https://dejure.org/2010,62516
EGMR, 13.07.2010 - 45661/99 (https://dejure.org/2010,62516)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 13.07.2010 - 45661/99 (https://dejure.org/2010,62516)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 13. Juli 2010 - 45661/99 (https://dejure.org/2010,62516)
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2010,62516) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.

Volltextveröffentlichung

  • Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

    CARABULEA v. ROMANIA

    Art. 2, Art. 2 Abs. 1, Art. 3, Art. 13, Art. 35, Art. 35 Abs. 1, Art. 41 MRK
    Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed (non-exhaustion of domestic remedies) Violation of Art. 2 (substantive aspect) Violation of Art. 2 (procedural aspect) Violation of Art. 3 (substantive aspect) Violation of Art. 3 (procedural aspect) Violation of ...

Verfahrensgang

 
Sortierung



Kontextvorschau





Hinweis: Klicken Sie auf das Sprechblasensymbol, um eine Kontextvorschau im Fließtext zu sehen. Um alle zu sehen, genügt ein Doppelklick.

Wird zitiert von ... (6)Neu Zitiert selbst (22)

  • EGMR, 06.07.2005 - 43579/98
    Auszug aus EGMR, 13.07.2010 - 45661/99
    Finally, the Court notes that it is its standard practice to rule that awards in relation to costs and expenses are to be paid directly into the applicant's representatives' accounts (see, for example, ToÄ?cu v. Turkey, no. 27601/95, § 162, 31 May 2005; Nachova and Others v. Bulgaria [GC], nos. 43577/98 and 43579/98, § 175, ECHR 2005-VII; and Imakayeva, cited above).

    It is for this reason that the authorities must use all available means to combat racism and racist violence (see Nachova and Others v. Bulgaria [GC], nos. 43577/98 and 43579/98, § 145, ECHR 2005-VII; and Timishev v. Russia, nos. 55762/00 and 55974/00, § 56, ECHR 2005-XII)).

    It is to be recalled that in the case of Nachova and Others v. Bulgaria (nos. 43577/98 and 43579/98, 26 February 2004), the Chamber established a fundamental principle which was subsequently confirmed by the Grand Chamber as concerns the obligation to investigate possible racist motives behind acts of violence by State agents.

    The respondent State's obligation to investigate possible racist overtones to a violent act is an obligation to use best endeavours and not absolute" (see Nachova and Others v. Bulgaria [GC], nos. 43577/98 and 43579/98, § 160, ECHR 2005-VII).

  • EGMR, 27.08.1992 - 12850/87

    TOMASI c. FRANCE

    Auszug aus EGMR, 13.07.2010 - 45661/99
    The Court also points out that where an individual, when taken into police custody, is in good health, but is found to be injured at the time of release, it is incumbent on the State to provide a plausible explanation of how those injuries were caused, failing which a clear issue arises under Article 3 of the Convention (see Tomasi v. France, judgment of 27 August 1992, §§ 108-11, Series A no. 241-A, and Selmouni v. France [GC], cited above, § 87).

    Where fundamental human rights are at issue the Court has not hesitated to develop its evidentiary law in order to assist it in its search for truth, establishing, where necessary, a shift in the burden of proof from the applicant onto the Government (see Tomasi v. France, 27 August 1992, §§ 108-111, Series A no. 241-A).

  • EGMR, 13.06.2002 - 38361/97

    ANGUELOVA v. BULGARIA

    Auszug aus EGMR, 13.07.2010 - 45661/99
    Indeed, the burden of proof may be regarded as resting on the authorities to provide a satisfactory and convincing explanation (see, among many other authorities, Anguelova v. Bulgaria, no. 38361/97, §§ 109-11, ECHR 2002-IV).

    Thus, in cases of suspicious death or ill-treatment, given the fundamental importance of the rights protected by Articles 2 and 3, Article 13 requires, in addition to the payment of compensation where appropriate, a thorough and effective investigation capable of leading to the identification and punishment of those responsible for the acts of ill-treatment (see Anguelova v. Bulgaria, no. 38361/97, §§ 161-162, ECHR 2002-IV; Assenov and Others v. Bulgaria, cited above, §§ 114 et seq.; and Süheyla Aydın v. Turkey, no. 25660/94, § 208, 24 May 2005).

  • EGMR, 25.11.1999 - 23118/93

    NILSEN AND JOHNSEN v. NORWAY

    Auszug aus EGMR, 13.07.2010 - 45661/99
    The Court reiterates that in order for costs and expenses to be reimbursed under Article 41, it must be established that they were actually and necessarily incurred and were reasonable as to quantum (see, for example, Nilsen and Johnsen v. Norway [GC], no. 23118/93, § 62, ECHR 1999-VIII, and Boicenco v. Moldova, no. 41088/05, § 176, 11 July 2006).
  • EGMR, 11.07.2000 - 20869/92

    DIKME c. TURQUIE

    Auszug aus EGMR, 13.07.2010 - 45661/99
    The Court has previously had before it cases in which it has found that there has been treatment which could only be described as torture (see Aksoy v. Turkey, judgment of 18 December 1996, § 64, Reports 1996-VI; Aydın v. Turkey, judgment of 25 September 1997, §§ 83-84 and 86, Reports 1997-VI; Selmouni v. France [GC], cited above; Dikme v. Turkey, no. 20869/92, §§ 94-96, ECHR 2000-VIII, and, among recent authorities, Batı and Others v. Turkey, nos. 33097/96 and 57834/00, § 116, ECHR 2004-IV (extracts)).
  • EGMR, 05.10.2000 - 57834/00

    KABLAN contre la TURQUIE

    Auszug aus EGMR, 13.07.2010 - 45661/99
    The Court has previously had before it cases in which it has found that there has been treatment which could only be described as torture (see Aksoy v. Turkey, judgment of 18 December 1996, § 64, Reports 1996-VI; Aydın v. Turkey, judgment of 25 September 1997, §§ 83-84 and 86, Reports 1997-VI; Selmouni v. France [GC], cited above; Dikme v. Turkey, no. 20869/92, §§ 94-96, ECHR 2000-VIII, and, among recent authorities, Batı and Others v. Turkey, nos. 33097/96 and 57834/00, § 116, ECHR 2004-IV (extracts)).
  • EGMR, 24.04.2003 - 24351/94

    AKTAS v. TURKEY

    Auszug aus EGMR, 13.07.2010 - 45661/99
    However, the Court has previously recognised that Convention proceedings do not in all cases lend themselves to a rigorous application of the principle affirmanti incumbit probatio (see Aktas v. Turkey (extracts), no. 24351/94, § 272, ECHR 2003-V).
  • EGMR, 03.06.2004 - 33097/96

    BATI AND OTHERS v. TURKEY

    Auszug aus EGMR, 13.07.2010 - 45661/99
    The Court has previously had before it cases in which it has found that there has been treatment which could only be described as torture (see Aksoy v. Turkey, judgment of 18 December 1996, § 64, Reports 1996-VI; Aydın v. Turkey, judgment of 25 September 1997, §§ 83-84 and 86, Reports 1997-VI; Selmouni v. France [GC], cited above; Dikme v. Turkey, no. 20869/92, §§ 94-96, ECHR 2000-VIII, and, among recent authorities, Batı and Others v. Turkey, nos. 33097/96 and 57834/00, § 116, ECHR 2004-IV (extracts)).
  • EGMR, 20.06.2006 - 17209/02

    ZARB ADAMI c. MALTE

    Auszug aus EGMR, 13.07.2010 - 45661/99
    However, in more recent cases on the question of discrimination the Court has relied extensively on statistics produced by the parties to establish a difference in treatment between two groups (men and women) in similar situations (see Hoogendijk v. the Netherlands (dec.), no. 58461/00, 6 January 2005 and Zarb Adami v. Malta, no. 17209/02, §§ 77-78, ECHR 2006-VIII).
  • EGMR, 11.07.2006 - 41088/05

    BOICENCO v. MOLDOVA

    Auszug aus EGMR, 13.07.2010 - 45661/99
    The Court reiterates that in order for costs and expenses to be reimbursed under Article 41, it must be established that they were actually and necessarily incurred and were reasonable as to quantum (see, for example, Nilsen and Johnsen v. Norway [GC], no. 23118/93, § 62, ECHR 1999-VIII, and Boicenco v. Moldova, no. 41088/05, § 176, 11 July 2006).
  • EGMR, 09.11.2006 - 7615/02

    IMAKAÏEVA c. RUSSIE

  • EGMR, 09.06.2009 - 33401/02

    Opuz ./. Türkei

  • EGMR, 27.04.1988 - 9659/82

    BOYLE AND RICE v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

  • EGMR, 08.07.1999 - 23763/94

    TANRIKULU c. TURQUIE

  • EGMR, 28.07.1999 - 25803/94

    Zur "Einzelfallprüfung" und "geltungszeitlichen Interpretation" im Rahmen des

  • EGMR, 18.05.2000 - 41488/98

    VELIKOVA c. BULGARIE

  • EGMR, 27.06.2000 - 21986/93

    Verursachung des Todes eines Gefangenen in türkischer Haft - Umfang der

  • EGMR, 27.06.2000 - 22277/93

    ILHAN c. TURQUIE

  • EGMR, 14.12.2000 - 22676/93

    GÜL v. TURKEY

  • EGMR, 10.04.2001 - 26129/95

    TANLI v. TURKEY

  • EGMR, 27.09.1995 - 18984/91

    McCANN AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

  • EGMR, 20.05.1999 - 21594/93

    Verursachung des Todes eines türkischen Staatsangehörigen durch türkische

  • EGMR, 16.12.2010 - 25579/05

    A, B und C ./. Irland

    Selon l'article 60 § 2 du règlement, toute prétention présentée au titre de l'article 41 de la Convention doit être chiffrée, ventilée par rubrique et accompagnée des justificatifs nécessaires, faute de quoi la Cour peut rejeter la demande, en tout ou en partie (Carabuela c. Roumanie, no 45661/99, § 179, 13 juillet 2010).
  • EGMR, 22.02.2011 - 24329/02

    SOARE ET AUTRES c. ROUMANIE

    J'ai déjà eu l'occasion de souligner (voir l'exposé de mon opinion dissidente joint à l'arrêt Carabulea c. Roumanie, no 45661/99, 13 juillet 2010) que, au vu des conclusions tirées par la Cour dans l'arrêt Natchova et autres c. Bulgarie [GC], nos 43577/98 et 43579/98, § 157, CEDH 2005-VII, il existe une obligation distincte d'enquêter sur les motivations racistes qui pourraient expliquer tel ou tel comportement individuel de policiers.

    Dans mon opinion en partie dissidente dans l'affaire Carabulea c. Roumanie (no 45661/99, 13 juillet 2010), j'ai estimé que, eu égard au problème, reconnu sur le plan international, du traitement des Roms en Roumanie, cet Etat avait l'obligation d'enquêter de manière approfondie sur toute agression perpétrée contre cette minorité ethnique.

  • EGMR, 05.12.2013 - 56759/08

    NEGREPONTIS-GIANNISIS c. GRÈCE

    Elle rappelle également que, selon l'article 60 § 2 du règlement, toute prétention présentée au titre de l'article 41 de la Convention doit être chiffrée, ventilée par rubrique et accompagnée des justificatifs nécessaires, faute de quoi la Cour peut rejeter la demande, en tout ou en partie (Carabuela c. Roumanie, no 45661/99, § 179, 13 juillet 2010).
  • EGMR, 22.09.2015 - 29896/13

    LAVRENTIADIS c. GRÈCE

    Elle rappelle également que, selon l'article 60 § 2 du règlement, toute prétention présentée au titre de l'article 41 de la Convention doit être chiffrée, ventilée par rubrique et accompagnée des justificatifs nécessaires, faute de quoi la Cour peut rejeter la demande, en tout ou en partie (Carabuela c. Roumanie, no 45661/99, § 179, 13 juillet 2010).
  • EGMR, 07.11.2013 - 4494/07

    BELOUSOV v. UKRAINE

    The Court notes that it has already ruled in some cases that awards in relation to costs and expenses can be paid directly into the accounts of the applicants" representatives (see, for example, ToÄ?cu v. Turkey, no. 27601/95, § 158, 31 May 2005; Nachova and Others v. Bulgaria [GC], nos 43577/98 and 43579/98, § 175, ECHR 2005-VII; Imakayeva v. Russia, no. 7615/02, ECHR 2006-XIII (extracts) and Carabulea v. Romania, no. 45661/99, § 180, 13 July 2010).
  • EGMR, 17.01.2013 - 52013/08

    MOSENDZ v. UKRAINE

    Secondly, an award of compensation to the applicant is required where appropriate or, at least, the possibility of seeking and obtaining compensation for the damage sustained as a result of the ill-treatment or death (see, for example, Gäfgen v. Germany [GC], no. 22978/05, § 116, ECHR 2010, with further references, and Carabulea v. Romania, no. 45661/99, § 165, 13 July 2010).
Haben Sie eine Ergänzung? Oder haben Sie einen Fehler gefunden? Schreiben Sie uns.
Sie können auswählen (Maus oder Pfeiltasten):
(Liste aufgrund Ihrer bisherigen Eingabe)
Komplette Übersicht