Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  SHULI v. GREECE

  Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Criminal proceedings;Article 6-1 - Access to court) (englisch)

Sonstiges

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  SHULI c. GRÈCE

  Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Protokoll Nr. 7 Art. 2 MRK
  [FRE]

Wird zitiert von ... (5)Neu Zitiert selbst (6)

• EGMR, 12.07.2001 - 42527/98

  Enteignung eines Gemäldes in Tschechien auf Grund der Benes-Dekrete - …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 13.07.2017 - 71891/10

  This is particularly true for the guarantees enshrined in Article 6, in view of the prominent place held in a democratic society by the right to a fair trial with all the guarantees under that Article (see Prince Hans-Adam II of Liechtenstein v. Germany [GC], no. 42527/98, § 45, ECHR 2001-VIII).
• EGMR, 27.07.2006 - 36998/02

  EFSTATHIOU ET AUTRES c. GRECE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 13.07.2017 - 71891/10

  In fact, the right of access to court is impaired when the rules cease to serve the aims of legal certainty and the proper administration of justice and form a sort of barrier preventing the litigant from having his or her case determined on the merits by the competent court (see Kart v. Turkey [GC], no. 8917/05, § 79, ECHR 2009 (extracts); Efstathiou and Others v. Greece, no. 36998/02, § 24, 27 July 2006; Vamvakas v. Greece, no. 36970/06, § 26, 16 October 2008; Louli-Georgopoulou v. Greece, no. 22756/09, § 39, 16 March 2017).
• EGMR, 16.10.2008 - 36970/06

  VAMVAKAS c. GRECE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 13.07.2017 - 71891/10

  In fact, the right of access to court is impaired when the rules cease to serve the aims of legal certainty and the proper administration of justice and form a sort of barrier preventing the litigant from having his or her case determined on the merits by the competent court (see Kart v. Turkey [GC], no. 8917/05, § 79, ECHR 2009 (extracts); Efstathiou and Others v. Greece, no. 36998/02, § 24, 27 July 2006; Vamvakas v. Greece, no. 36970/06, § 26, 16 October 2008; Louli-Georgopoulou v. Greece, no. 22756/09, § 39, 16 March 2017).

 
• EGMR, 27.03.2014 - 31150/09

  ERFAR-AVEF c. GRÈCE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 13.07.2017 - 71891/10

  Furthermore, a limitation will not be compatible with Article 6 § 1 if it does not pursue a legitimate aim and if there is not a reasonable relationship of proportionality between the means employed and the aim pursued (see Lupeni Greek Catholic Parish and Others v. Romania [GC], no. 76943/11, § 89, ECHR 2016 (extracts), and Erfar-Avef v. Greece, no. 31150/09, § 40, 27 March 2014).
• EGMR, 16.03.2017 - 22756/09

  LOULI-GEORGOPOULOU c. GRÈCE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 13.07.2017 - 71891/10

  In fact, the right of access to court is impaired when the rules cease to serve the aims of legal certainty and the proper administration of justice and form a sort of barrier preventing the litigant from having his or her case determined on the merits by the competent court (see Kart v. Turkey [GC], no. 8917/05, § 79, ECHR 2009 (extracts); Efstathiou and Others v. Greece, no. 36998/02, § 24, 27 July 2006; Vamvakas v. Greece, no. 36970/06, § 26, 16 October 2008; Louli-Georgopoulou v. Greece, no. 22756/09, § 39, 16 March 2017).
• EGMR, 02.06.2016 - 18880/15

  PAPAIOANNOU c. GRÈCE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 13.07.2017 - 71891/10

  It is primarily for the national authorities, notably the courts, to resolve problems of interpretation of national legislation (see Perez v. France [GC], no. 47287/99, § 82, ECHR 2004-I, and Papaioannou v. Greece, no. 18880/15, § 39, 2 June 2016).

• EGMR, 07.07.2022 - 48195/17

  TOROSIAN c. GRÈCE

  Le droit interne pertinent 54. Les dispositions du droit interne pertinentes en l'espèce sont décrites dans les arrêts Andersen c. Grèce (no 42660/11, § 39, 26 avril 2018), Tsalikidis et autres c. Grèce (no 73974/14, § 34, 16 novembre 2017), Shuli c. Grèce (no 71891/10, § 14, 13 juillet 2017) et Nieciecki c. Grèce (no 11677/11, § 25, 4 décembre 2012).
• EGMR, 01.03.2022 - 4561/17

  ASPIOTIS c. GRÈCE

  Le droit interne pertinent 34. Les dispositions du droit interne pertinentes en l'espèce sont décrites dans les arrêts Andersen c. Grèce (no 42660/11, § 39, 26 avril 2018), Tsalikidis et autres c. Grèce (no 73974/14, § 34, 16 novembre 2017), Shuli c. Grèce (no 71891/10, § 14, 13 juillet 2017) et Nieciecki c. Grèce (no 11677/11, § 25, 4 décembre 2012).
• EGMR, 26.01.2023 - 60990/14

  B.Y. c. GRÈCE

  Les dispositions du droit interne pertinentes en l'espèce sont décrites dans les arrêts Andersen c. Grèce (no 42660/11, § 39, 26 avril 2018), A.E.A. c. Grèce (no 39034/12, §§ 33-43, 15 mars 2018), Tsalikidis et autres c. Grèce (no 73974/14, § 34, 16 novembre 2017), Shuli c. Grèce (no 71891/10, § 14, 13 juillet 2017) et Nieciecki c. Grèce (no 11677/11, § 25, 4 décembre 2012).
• EGMR, 13.11.2018 - 6970/15

  ZHANG v. UKRAINE

  This is particularly true for the guarantees enshrined in Article 6, in view of the prominent place held in a democratic society by the right to a fair trial with all the guarantees under that Article (see, for a recent reference among many other authorities, Shuli v. Greece, no. 71891/10, § 27, 13 July 2017).
• EGMR - 56411/15 (anhängig)

  ARGINERT SH.P.K. TIRANE v. ALBANIA

  Did the Constitutional Court's decision, rejecting the applicant company's constitutional complaint as being lodged out of time, violate the applicant company's right of access to a court as guaranteed by Article 6 § 1 of the Convention (see Shuli v. Greece, no. 71891/10, §§ 24-27, 13 July 2017; Frida, LLC v. Ukraine, no. 24003/07, §§ 32-39, 8 December 2016; and Dumitru Gheorghe v. Romania, no. 33883/06, §§ 25-28, 12 April 2016)?.