Volltextveröffentlichungen (2)

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  B. AND L. v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

  Art. 12, Art. 14+12, Art. 14, Art. 41 MRK
  Violation of Art. 12 Non-pecuniary damage - finding of violation sufficient Costs and expenses partial award - Convention proceedings (englisch)

• juris(Abodienst) (Volltext/Leitsatz)

Kurzfassungen/Presse

• RIS Bundeskanzleramt Österreich (Ausführliche Zusammenfassung)

Verfahrensgang

• EGMR, 29.06.2004 - 36536/02
• EGMR, 13.09.2005 - 36536/02

Papierfundstellen

• FamRZ 2005, 1971 (Ls.)

Wird zitiert von ... (8)Neu Zitiert selbst (3)

• EGMR, 18.12.1987 - 11329/85

  F. v. SWITZERLAND

  Auszug aus EGMR, 13.09.2005 - 36536/02

  It is subject to the national laws of the Contracting States but the limitations thereby introduced must not restrict or reduce the right in such a way or to such an extent that the very essence of the right is impaired (see Rees v. the United Kingdom, judgment of 17 October 1986, Series A no. 106, § 50; F. v. Switzerland, judgment of 18 December 1987, Series A no. 128, § 32).
• EGMR, 11.07.2002 - 28957/95

  Christine Goodwin ./. Vereinigtes Königreich

  Auszug aus EGMR, 13.09.2005 - 36536/02

  The finding of violation, with the consequences which will ensue for the future, may in these circumstances be regarded as constituting just satisfaction (see also Christine Goodwin v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 28957/95, § 120, ECHR 2002-VI).
• EGMR, 17.10.1986 - 9532/81

  REES v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

  Auszug aus EGMR, 13.09.2005 - 36536/02

  It is subject to the national laws of the Contracting States but the limitations thereby introduced must not restrict or reduce the right in such a way or to such an extent that the very essence of the right is impaired (see Rees v. the United Kingdom, judgment of 17 October 1986, Series A no. 106, § 50; F. v. Switzerland, judgment of 18 December 1987, Series A no. 128, § 32).

• EGMR, 24.06.2010 - 30141/04

  SCHALK AND KOPF v. AUSTRIA

  thereby introduced must not restrict or reduce the right in such a way or to such an extent that the very essence of the right is impaired (see B. and L. v. the United Kingdom, no. 36536/02, § 34, 13 September 2005, and F. v. Switzerland, 18 December 1987, § 32, Series A no. 128).
• BVerwG, 19.07.2012 - 10 C 2.12

  Visum; nationales Visum; Ehe; Internationales Privatrecht; selbstständige …

  Die vom Kläger herangezogene Rechtsprechung des Europäischen Gerichtshofs für Menschenrechte zu Art. 12 EMRK (Entscheidung der 4. Sektion vom 13. September 2005 - Nr. 36536/02) betraf eine Fallkonstellation langjährigen Zusammenlebens in ständiger Partnerschaft, die mit dem vorliegenden Fall nicht vergleichbar und nicht auf diesen zu übertragen ist.
• EGMR, 10.01.2017 - 1955/10

  Ein Recht auf Scheidung? Pole scheitert mit Scheidungswunsch

  of the Contracting States but the limitations thereby introduced must not restrict or reduce the right to marry in such a way or to such an extent that the very essence of the right to marry is impaired (see Rees v. United Kingdom, 17 October 1986, § 50, Series A no. 106; F. v. Switzerland, 18 December 1987, § 32, Series A no. 128; and B. and L. v. United Kingdom, no. 36536/02, § 34, 13 September 2005).

  The exercise of the right to marry is subject to the laws of the Contracting States, but any limitations thereby introduced must not restrict or reduce the right to marry in such a way or to such an extent that the very essence of the right to marry is impaired (see Rees v. the United Kingdom, 17 October 1986, § 50, Series A no. 106; F. v. Switzerland, 18 December 1987, § 32, Series A no. 128; and B. and L. v. the United Kingdom, no. 36536/02, § 34, 13 September 2005).

  47. The need to protect the essence of the right to marry was the major concern in the judgment of B. and L. v. the United Kingdom, no. 36536/02, 13 September 2005, concerning the prohibition on marriage between a fatherinlaw and his daughterinlaw.

 
• EGMR, 10.04.2018 - 75157/14

  Asylbewerber monatelang festgehalten: Polen muss 12.000 Euro Entschädigung zahlen

  The resulting judgment of the domestic court is necessarily binding on the parties to the proceedings (see, by contrast, Burden, §§ 40 and 43, cited above, and B. and L. v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 36536/02, 29 June 2004).

  Such an approach, in turn, would defeat the object and purpose underlying the Convention that rights and freedoms should be secured by the Contracting State within its jurisdiction and undermine the subsidiary nature of the Court's own role and capacity to function (see B. and L. v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 36536/02, 29 June 2004, and Burden v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 13378/05, § 42, ECHR 2008).

• EGMR, 10.02.2011 - 9957/08

  KOROSIDOU c. GRECE

  Ce point de vue a été partagé par la Grande Chambre dans son arrêt Burden précité (§ 63), où elle a rappelé que l'exercice du droit de se marier est protégé par l'article 12 de la Convention et emporte des conséquences sociales, personnelles et juridiques (B. et L. c. Royaume-Uni (déc.), no 36536/02, 29 juin 2004, § 34).
• EGMR, 15.12.2005 - 18273/04

  BARRY v. IRELAND

  33985/96 and 33986/96, § 28, ECHR 2000-IX and, more recently, B. and L. v. the United Kingdom, no. 36536/02, § 50, 13 September 2005).
• EGMR, 05.09.2019 - 57854/15

  THEODOROU ET TSOTSOROU c. GRÈCE

  Ils ajoutaient que, dans son arrêt B. et L. c. Royaume-Uni (no 36536/02, 13 septembre 2005) la Cour avait déjà conclu que la législation britannique interdisant le mariage entre un beau-père et sa belle-fille était contraire aux articles 12 et 14 de la Convention.
• EGMR, 11.04.2006 - 29800/04

  UPTON v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

  Article 35 § 1 also requires that the complaints intended to be brought subsequently before the Court should have been made to the appropriate domestic body, at least in substance and in compliance with the formal requirements laid down in domestic law, but not that recourse should be had to remedies which are inadequate or ineffective (e.g. Akdivar and Others v. Turkey, no. 21893/93, §§ 65-67, ECHR 1996-IV; Aksoy v. Turkey, no. 21987/93, §§ 51-52, ECHR 1996-VI; B and L v. the United Kingdom, no. 36536/02 (dec.), 29 June 2004).