Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  HAN v. TURKEY

  Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 6 Abs. 3 Buchst. b, Art. 10, Art. 10 Abs. 1, Art. 41 MRK
  Violation of Art. 6-1 Not necessary to examine Art. 6-3-b Violation of Art. 10 Pecuniary damage - claim rejected Non-pecuniary damage - finding of violation of Art. 6 sufficient in that regard financial award in respect of the violation of Art. 10 Costs and ...

Verfahrensgang

• EGMR, 30.11.2004 - 50997/99
• EGMR, 13.09.2005 - 50997/99

Wird zitiert von ... (2)Neu Zitiert selbst (6)

• EGMR, 08.07.1999 - 23556/94

  CEYLAN c. TURQUIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 13.09.2005 - 50997/99

  The Court notes at the outset that it has examined a number of cases raising similar issues to those in the present case and found a violation of Article 10 of the Convention (see, in particular, the following judgments: Ceylan v. Turkey [GC], no. 23556/94, § 38, ECHR 1999-IV, Öztürk v. Turkey [GC], no. 22479/93, § 74, ECHR 1999-VI, Ä°brahim Aksoy, cited above, § 80, Kızılyaprak v. Turkey, no. 27528/95, § 43, 2 October 2003, and Gümüs and Others, cited above, §§ 14-19).
• EGMR, 08.07.1999 - 24762/94

  SÜREK c. TURQUIE (N° 4)

  Auszug aus EGMR, 13.09.2005 - 50997/99

  The Court has examined the reasons given in the State Security Court's judgment and does not consider them sufficient to justify the interference with the applicant's right to freedom of expression (see, mutatis mutandis, Sürek v. Turkey (no. 4) [GC], no. 24762/94, § 58, 8 July 1999).
• EGMR, 08.07.1999 - 24919/94

  GERGER v. TURKEY

  Auszug aus EGMR, 13.09.2005 - 50997/99

  In the Court's view, this is the essential factor (contrast Sürek v. Turkey (no. 1) [GC], no. 26682/95, § 62, ECHR 1999-IV, and Gerger v. Turkey [GC], no. 24919/94, § 50, 8 July 1999) in the assessment of the necessity of the measure.

 
• EGMR, 08.07.1999 - 26682/95

  SÜREK c. TURQUIE (N° 1)

  Auszug aus EGMR, 13.09.2005 - 50997/99

  In the Court's view, this is the essential factor (contrast Sürek v. Turkey (no. 1) [GC], no. 26682/95, § 62, ECHR 1999-IV, and Gerger v. Turkey [GC], no. 24919/94, § 50, 8 July 1999) in the assessment of the necessity of the measure.
• EGMR, 28.09.1999 - 22479/93

  ÖZTÜRK v. TURKEY

  Auszug aus EGMR, 13.09.2005 - 50997/99

  The Court notes at the outset that it has examined a number of cases raising similar issues to those in the present case and found a violation of Article 10 of the Convention (see, in particular, the following judgments: Ceylan v. Turkey [GC], no. 23556/94, § 38, ECHR 1999-IV, Öztürk v. Turkey [GC], no. 22479/93, § 74, ECHR 1999-VI, Ä°brahim Aksoy, cited above, § 80, Kızılyaprak v. Turkey, no. 27528/95, § 43, 2 October 2003, and Gümüs and Others, cited above, §§ 14-19).
• EGMR, 02.10.2003 - 27528/95

  KIZILYAPRAK c. TURQUIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 13.09.2005 - 50997/99

  The Court notes at the outset that it has examined a number of cases raising similar issues to those in the present case and found a violation of Article 10 of the Convention (see, in particular, the following judgments: Ceylan v. Turkey [GC], no. 23556/94, § 38, ECHR 1999-IV, Öztürk v. Turkey [GC], no. 22479/93, § 74, ECHR 1999-VI, Ä°brahim Aksoy, cited above, § 80, Kızılyaprak v. Turkey, no. 27528/95, § 43, 2 October 2003, and Gümüs and Others, cited above, §§ 14-19).

• EGMR, 31.07.2007 - 52709/99

  ULUSOY v. TURKEY

  The Court has examined a number of cases raising similar issues to those arising in the present case and found a violation of Article 10 of the Convention (see, in particular, the following judgments: Ceylan v. Turkey [GC], no. 23556/94, § 38, ECHR 1999-IV; Öztürk, cited above, § 74; Ä°brahim Aksoy, cited above, § 80; Kızılyaprak v. Turkey, no. 27528/95, § 43, 2 October 2003; and Han v. Turkey, no. 50997/99, §§ 27-33, 13 September 2005).
• EGMR, 09.01.2007 - 41827/02

  KOMMERSANT MOLDOVY v. MOLDOVA

  These "duties and responsibilities" are liable to assume significance when, as in the present case, there is a question of endangering the national security and the territorial integrity of a State (Han v. Turkey, no. 50997/99, §§ 30 et seq., 13 September 2005).