Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  GERDZHIKOV AND CHATEAU VALLEE DES ROSES EOOD v. BULGARIA

  Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 13+6 Abs. 1, Art. 13, Art. 13+P1 Abs. 1, Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1, Art. 14+13, Art. 14, Art. 14+P1 Abs. 1 MRK
  Inadmissible (englisch)

Sonstiges

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  [ENG]

Wird zitiert von ...Neu Zitiert selbst (5)

• EGMR, 01.03.2002 - 48778/99

  KUTIC v. CROATIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 13.09.2011 - 8947/05

  While it is clear that in the instant case the applicant company was not prevented from commencing the proceedings, that does not suffice because the right of access to court includes not only the right to institute proceedings but also the right to obtain a determination of the dispute by a court (see Kutic v. Croatia, no. 48778/99, § 25, ECHR 2002-II; Lungoci v. Romania, no. 62710/00, § 35, 26 January 2006; Yanakiev v. Bulgaria, no. 40476/98, § 68, 10 August 2006; and Velikovi and Others v. Bulgaria, nos. 43278/98 et al., § 258, 15 March 2007).
• EGMR, 10.08.2006 - 40476/98

  YANAKIEV v. BULGARIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 13.09.2011 - 8947/05

  While it is clear that in the instant case the applicant company was not prevented from commencing the proceedings, that does not suffice because the right of access to court includes not only the right to institute proceedings but also the right to obtain a determination of the dispute by a court (see Kutic v. Croatia, no. 48778/99, § 25, ECHR 2002-II; Lungoci v. Romania, no. 62710/00, § 35, 26 January 2006; Yanakiev v. Bulgaria, no. 40476/98, § 68, 10 August 2006; and Velikovi and Others v. Bulgaria, nos. 43278/98 et al., § 258, 15 March 2007).
• EGMR, 15.03.2007 - 43278/98

  VELIKOVI AND OTHERS v. BULGARIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 13.09.2011 - 8947/05

  While it is clear that in the instant case the applicant company was not prevented from commencing the proceedings, that does not suffice because the right of access to court includes not only the right to institute proceedings but also the right to obtain a determination of the dispute by a court (see Kutic v. Croatia, no. 48778/99, § 25, ECHR 2002-II; Lungoci v. Romania, no. 62710/00, § 35, 26 January 2006; Yanakiev v. Bulgaria, no. 40476/98, § 68, 10 August 2006; and Velikovi and Others v. Bulgaria, nos. 43278/98 et al., § 258, 15 March 2007).
• EGMR, 28.06.1990 - 11761/85

  Obermeier ./. Österreich

  Auszug aus EGMR, 13.09.2011 - 8947/05

  It this connection, the Court reiterates that the mere fact that a legal action was held to be inadmissible does not mean that the applicant was denied access to court, provided that the dispute which he submitted for adjudication was the subject of a genuine examination (see Velikovi and Others, cited above, § 260; Yanakiev, cited above, § 69; and, mutatis mutandis, Obermeier v. Austria, 28 June 1990, § 68, Series A no. 179).
• EGMR, 21.02.1975 - 4451/70

  GOLDER c. ROYAUME-UNI

  Auszug aus EGMR, 13.09.2011 - 8947/05

  The Court reiterates that Article 6 § 1 of the Convention secures to everyone the right to have any claim relating to his civil rights and obligations brought before a court or tribunal; in this way it embodies the "right to court", of which the right of access constitutes one aspect (see Golder v. the United Kingdom, 21 February 1975, §§ 28-36, Series A no. 18, and Osman v. the United Kingdom, 28 October 1998, § 147, Reports 1998-VIII).

• EGMR, 30.01.2024 - 18076/12

  VJOLA SH.P.K. AND DE SH.P.K. v. ALBANIA

  Having regard to the foregoing, it cannot be said that the limitation on the applicant companies' right of access to court impaired the essence of the right or was disproportionate for the purposes of Article 6 § 1 of the Convention (compare Waite and Kennedy, cited above, § 73; A. v. the United Kingdom, no. 35373/97, § 86, ECHR 2002-X; and Gerdzhikov and Château Vallée Des Roses EOOD v. Bulgaria (dec.), no. 8947/05, § 47, 13 September 2011; and contrast Cordova c. Italie (no 1), no 40877/98, § 65, CEDH 2003-I, and Wo?› v. Poland, no. 22860/02, § 108, ECHR 2006-VII).