Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  UZUNGET AND OTHERS v. TURKEY

  Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 11, Art. 11 Abs. 1, Art. 11 Abs. 2, Art. 41 MRK
  Remainder inadmissible Violation of Art. 6-1 Violation of Art. 11 Non-pecuniary damage - award Pecuniary damage - claim dismissed (englisch)

Wird zitiert von ... (6)Neu Zitiert selbst (7)

• EGMR, 16.12.1999 - 24724/94

  Mord an James Bulger

  Auszug aus EGMR, 13.10.2009 - 21831/03

  It reiterates, however, that Article 6, read as a whole, guarantees the right of an accused to participate effectively in his criminal trial (see T. v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 24724/94, § 83, 16 December 1999).
• EGMR, 06.06.2000 - 28135/95

  MAGEE v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

  Auszug aus EGMR, 13.10.2009 - 21831/03

  Furthermore, the primary purpose of this provision is to ensure a fair trial by a "tribunal" competent to determine any "criminal charge" on the basis of the rule of law and in compliance with proceedings prescribed by law (see, mutatis mutandis, Magee v. the United Kingdom, no. 28135/95, § 41, ECHR 2000-VI, and Belilos v. Switzerland, 29 April 1988, § 64, Series A no. 132).
• EGMR, 05.12.2006 - 74552/01

  OYA ATAMAN c. TURQUIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 13.10.2009 - 21831/03

  It is clear from this case-law that the authorities have a duty to take appropriate measures with regard to lawful demonstrations in order to ensure their peaceful conduct and the safety of all citizens (see Balçık and Others v. Turkey, no. 25/02, § 46, 29 November 2007, and Oya Ataman v. Turkey, no. 74552/01, § 35, ECHR 2006-....).

 
• EGMR, 29.11.2007 - 25/02

  BALÇIK AND OTHERS v. TURKEY

  Auszug aus EGMR, 13.10.2009 - 21831/03

  It is clear from this case-law that the authorities have a duty to take appropriate measures with regard to lawful demonstrations in order to ensure their peaceful conduct and the safety of all citizens (see Balçık and Others v. Turkey, no. 25/02, § 46, 29 November 2007, and Oya Ataman v. Turkey, no. 74552/01, § 35, ECHR 2006-....).
• EGMR, 20.02.2003 - 20652/92

  DJAVIT AN c. TURQUIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 13.10.2009 - 21831/03

  Turning to the question of whether the interference was "necessary in a democratic society", the Court refers in the first place to the fundamental principles underlying its judgments relating to Article 11 (see Djavit An v. Turkey, no. 20652/92, §§ 56-57, ECHR 2003-III, and Plattform "Ärzte für das Leben" v. Austria, 21 June 1988, § 32, Series A no. 139).
• EGMR, 29.04.1988 - 10328/83

  BELILOS v. SWITZERLAND

  Auszug aus EGMR, 13.10.2009 - 21831/03

  Furthermore, the primary purpose of this provision is to ensure a fair trial by a "tribunal" competent to determine any "criminal charge" on the basis of the rule of law and in compliance with proceedings prescribed by law (see, mutatis mutandis, Magee v. the United Kingdom, no. 28135/95, § 41, ECHR 2000-VI, and Belilos v. Switzerland, 29 April 1988, § 64, Series A no. 132).
• EGMR, 21.06.1988 - 10126/82

  Plattform "Ärzte für das Leben" ./. Österreich

  Auszug aus EGMR, 13.10.2009 - 21831/03

  Turning to the question of whether the interference was "necessary in a democratic society", the Court refers in the first place to the fundamental principles underlying its judgments relating to Article 11 (see Djavit An v. Turkey, no. 20652/92, §§ 56-57, ECHR 2003-III, and Plattform "Ärzte für das Leben" v. Austria, 21 June 1988, § 32, Series A no. 139).

• EGMR, 18.06.2013 - 8029/07

  GÜN ET AUTRES c. TURQUIE

  Toutefois il convient de souligner que des requérants ont été également condamnés à une peine d'emprisonnement (voir, par exemple, Uzunget et autres c. Turquie, no 21831/03, § 54, 13 octobre 2009, 1e tribunal correctionnel ayant condamné trois requérants sur les dix poursuivis à une peine d'un an et trois mois d'emprisonnement pour participation à une manifestation qui s'était déroulée sans l'autorisation des autorités nationales compétentes, au mépris de la loi no 2991).
• EGMR, 22.11.2022 - 48694/10

  ÇIÇEK ET AUTRES c. TÜRKIYE

  Elle a conclu que les manifestations en question relevaient du champ d'application de l'article 11 de la Convention au motif que les organisateurs de ces rassemblements n'avaient pas exprimé d'intentions violentes et qu'il n'y avait aucune raison de croire que les rassemblements n'étaient pas censés être pacifiques (Nurettin Aldemir et autres c. Turquie, nos 32124/02, 32126/02, 32129/02, 32132/02, 32133/02, 32137/02 et 32138/02, § 45, 18 décembre 2007, Protopapa c. Turquie, no 16084/90, §§ 76 et 104, 24 février 2009, Uzunget et autres c. Turquie, no 21831/03, § 52, 13 octobre 2009, Asproftas c. Turquie, no 16079/90, § 106, 27 mai 2010, Gün et autres c. Turquie, no 8029/07, § 50, 18 juin 2013, Gülcü précité, §§ 91-97, Yaroslav Belousov c. Russie, nos 2653/13 et 60980/14, §§ 169-172, 4 octobre 2016).
• EGMR, 14.11.2017 - 41226/09

  Türkei verurteilt: Nicht jeder ist ein Terrorist

  Thus, the Court has found in a number of cases that penalties imposed for taking part in a rally amounted to an interference with the right to freedom of assembly (see, for example, Ezelin, cited above, § 41; Osmani and Others v. "the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia" (dec.), no. 50841/99, ECHR 2001-X; Mkrtchyan v. Armenia, no. 6562/03, § 37, 11 January 2007; Galstyan, cited above, § 101; Ashughyan v. Armenia, no. 33268/03, § 77, 17 July 2008; Sergey Kuznetsov v. Russia, no. 10877/04, § 36, 23 October 2008; Uzunget and Others v. Turkey, no. 21831/03, § 43, 13 October 2009; and Yilmaz Yildiz and Others v. Turkey, no. 4524/06, § 34, 14 October 2014).

 
• EGMR, 19.01.2016 - 17526/10

  GÜLCÜ v. TURKEY

  Thus, the Court has considered in a number of cases that penalties imposed for taking part in a rally amounted to an interference with the right to freedom of assembly (see, for example, Ezelin, cited above, § 41; Osmani and Others v. "the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia" (dec.), no. 50841/99, ECHR 2001-X; Mkrtchyan v. Armenia, no. 6562/03, § 37, 11 January 2007; Galstyan, cited above, § 101; Ashughyan v Armenia, no. 33268/03, § 77, 17 July 2008; Sergey Kuznetsov v. Russia, no. 10877/04, § 36, 23 October 2008; Uzunget and Others v. Turkey, no. 21831/03, § 43, 13 October 2009; and Yilmaz Yildiz and Others v. Turkey, no. 4524/06, § 34, 14 October 2014).
• EGMR, 10.07.2018 - 57316/10

  IMRET v. TURKEY (No. 2)

  Thus, the Court has found in a number of cases that penalties imposed for taking part in a rally amounted to an interference with the right to freedom of assembly (see, for example, Ezelin, cited above, § 41; Osmani and Others v. "the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia" (dec.), no. 50841/99, ECHR 2001-X; Mkrtchyan v. Armenia, no. 6562/03, § 37, 11 January 2007; Galstyan, cited above, § 101; Ashughyan v. Armenia, no. 33268/03, § 77, 17 July 2008; Sergey Kuznetsov v. Russia, no. 10877/04, § 36, 23 October 2008; Uzunget and Others v. Turkey, no. 21831/03, § 43, 13 October 2009; and Yilmaz Yildiz and Others v. Turkey, no. 4524/06, § 34, 14 October 2014).
• EGMR - 21873/21 (anhängig)

  HLAVÁCEK c. RÉPUBLIQUE TCHÈQUE

  a) a-t-il été en mesure de bénéficier de droits procéduraux garantis par ces dispositions et de participer de manière effective à la procédure menée en l'espèce (voir, mutatis mutandis, Uzunget et autres c. Turquie, no 21831/03, §§ 34-37, 13 octobre 2009) ?.