Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 13.10.2009 - 43471/02 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2009,67197) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
SUBRT v. THE CZECH REPUBLIC
Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1 MRK
Inadmissible (englisch)
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (4)
- EGMR, 06.09.2001 - 69789/01
BRUSCO v. ITALY
Auszug aus EGMR, 13.10.2009 - 43471/02
It finds, however, that while it is true that, according to the "generally recognised principles of international law", there may be special circumstances which absolve the applicants from the obligation to exhaust the domestic remedies at their disposal, the existence of mere doubts as to the prospects of success of a particular remedy which is not obviously futile is not a valid reason for failing to exhaust domestic remedies (see Brusco v. Italy (dec.), no. 69789/01, ECHR 2001-IX). - EGMR, 10.07.2003 - 53341/99
Rechtssache H. gegen TSCHECHISCHE REPUBLIK
Auszug aus EGMR, 13.10.2009 - 43471/02
The Court further recalls that in Busková v. Czech Republic ((dec.), no. 36854/03, 15 January 2008), it examined the remedy offered by Act no. 82/1998 in the version in force until 26 April 2006 and found that it constituted a remedy of which applicants must avail themselves in cases where they complained that the length of proceedings had caused them the financial losses (see, a contrario for non-pecuniary damage, Hartman v. Czech Republic, no. 53341/99, § 68, ECHR 2003-VIII). - EGMR, 15.01.2008 - 36854/03
BUSKOVA v. THE CZECH REPUBLIC
Auszug aus EGMR, 13.10.2009 - 43471/02
The Court further recalls that in Busková v. Czech Republic ((dec.), no. 36854/03, 15 January 2008), it examined the remedy offered by Act no. 82/1998 in the version in force until 26 April 2006 and found that it constituted a remedy of which applicants must avail themselves in cases where they complained that the length of proceedings had caused them the financial losses (see, a contrario for non-pecuniary damage, Hartman v. Czech Republic, no. 53341/99, § 68, ECHR 2003-VIII). - EGMR, 22.10.2009 - 22774/03
OZVER c. BULGARIE
Auszug aus EGMR, 13.10.2009 - 43471/02
The implementation of final, binding judicial decisions which cannot, therefore, be unduly delayed (Immobiliare Saffi v. Italy [GC], no. 22774/03, §§ 63 and 66, ECHR 1999-V).