Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 13.10.2009 - 44946/05 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2009,67089) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
HUUHTANEN v. FINLAND
Sonstiges
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)
[ENG]
Wird zitiert von ... Neu Zitiert selbst (4)
- EGMR, 25.11.1993 - 14191/88
HOLM v. SWEDEN
Auszug aus EGMR, 13.10.2009 - 44946/05
It should be reiterated that the principles established in the Court's case-law apply to jurors as they do to professional judges and lay judges (see Holm v. Sweden, 25 November 1993, § 30, Series A no. 279-A; and Pullar v. the United Kingdom, 10 June 1996, § 29, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1996-III). - EGMR, 23.06.1981 - 6878/75
LE COMPTE, VAN LEUVEN ET DE MEYERE c. BELGIQUE
Auszug aus EGMR, 13.10.2009 - 44946/05
Consequently, the Insurance Court had been independent and impartial and the proceedings before it had in any event been able to remedy the alleged lack of impartiality of the Unemployment Appeal Board (see Le Compte, Van Leuven and De Meyere v. Belgium, 23 June 1981, § 51, Series A no. 43; and more recently Frankowicz v. Poland, no. 53025/99, § 60, 16 December 2008). - EGMR, 22.10.1984 - 8790/79
Sramek ./. Österreich
Auszug aus EGMR, 13.10.2009 - 44946/05
The principle of impartiality is an important element in support of the confidence which the courts must inspire in a democratic society (see Sramek v. Austria, 22 October 1984, § 42, Series A no. 84). - EGMR, 21.12.2000 - 33958/96
WETTSTEIN v. SWITZERLAND
Auszug aus EGMR, 13.10.2009 - 44946/05
The existence of impartiality for the purposes of Article 6 § 1 of the Convention must be determined according to a subjective test, that is on the basis of the personal conviction of a particular judge in a given case, and also according to an objective test, that is by ascertaining whether the judge offered guarantees sufficient to exclude any legitimate doubt in this respect (see Wettstein v. Switzerland, no. 33958/96, § 42, ECHR 2000-XII).
- EGMR, 21.06.2011 - 46575/09
BELLIZZI v. MALTA
Similarly, court officials dealing with a case, such as "referendaries" are not excluded (see, by implication, Jenny v. Switzerland, Commission Decision no. 27043/95, 16 January 1996, and Huuhtanen v. Finland (dec.), no. 44946/05, 13 October 2009).