Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  FEXLER v. SWEDEN

  Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 35, Art. 35 Abs. 1 MRK
  No violation of Art. 6-1 (englisch)

Sonstiges

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  Fexler v. Sweden

Wird zitiert von ... (3)Neu Zitiert selbst (8)

• EGMR, 21.02.1990 - 11855/85

  H?KANSSON AND STURESSON v. SWEDEN

  Auszug aus EGMR, 13.10.2011 - 36801/06

  As concerns the proceedings before the Administrative Court of Appeal, it has not been alleged that the applicant waived her right to a hearing under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention (cf, Håkansson and Sturesson v. Sweden, 21 February 1990, §§ 64 and 66, Series A no. 171-A; and Schuler-Zgraggen v. Switzerland, cited above, § 58).
• EGMR, 29.10.1991 - 11826/85

  HELMERS c. SUÈDE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 13.10.2011 - 36801/06

  Regard must be had to the nature of the national appeal system, to the scope of the appellate court's powers and to the manner in which the applicant's interests are actually presented and protected in the appeal, particularly in the light of the nature of the issues to be decided by it, and whether these raise any questions of fact or questions of law which cannot be adequately resolved on the basis of the case file (see for instance Helmers v. Sweden, 29 October 1991, § 36, Series A no. 212-A).
• EGMR, 24.06.1993 - 14518/89

  SCHULER-ZGRAGGEN c. SUISSE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 13.10.2011 - 36801/06

  Systematically holding hearings could be an obstacle to the particular diligence required in social-security cases (see Schuler-Zgraggen v. Switzerland, 24 June 1993, § 58, Series A no. 263; Salomonsson v. Sweden, cited above, § 38; Lundevall v. Sweden, cited above, § 38; and Döry v. Sweden, cited above, § 41).

 
• EGMR, 26.10.2000 - 30210/96

  Das Recht auf Verfahrensbeschleunigung gemäß Art. 6 Abs. 1 S. 1 EMRK in …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 13.10.2011 - 36801/06

  Based on this finding, and with reference, inter alia, to Articles 6 and 13 of the Convention and the Court's case-law under these provisions, in particular the case of Kudla v. Poland ([GC], no. 30210/96, ECHR 2000-XI), the Supreme Court concluded that the plaintiff was entitled to compensation under Swedish law for both pecuniary and non-pecuniary damages.
• EGMR, 28.07.1999 - 25803/94

  Zur "Einzelfallprüfung" und "geltungszeitlichen Interpretation" im Rahmen des …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 13.10.2011 - 36801/06

  Thus the complaint intended to be made subsequently to the Court must first have been made - at least in substance - to the appropriate domestic body, and in compliance with the formal requirements and time-limits laid down in domestic law (see Selmouni v. France [GC], no. 25803/94, § 74, ECHR 1999-V, with further references).
• EGMR, 26.04.1995 - 16922/90

  FISCHER c. AUTRICHE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 13.10.2011 - 36801/06

  The Court reiterates that in proceedings before a court of first and only instance the right to a "public hearing" under Article 6 § 1 entails an entitlement to an "oral hearing" unless there are exceptional circumstances that justify dispensing with such a hearing (see, for instance, Fredin v. Sweden (no. 2), 23 February 1994, §§ 21-22, Series A no. 283-A; Fischer v. Austria, 26 April 1995, § 44, Series A no. 312; Allan Jacobsson v. Sweden (no. 2), 19 February 1998, § 46, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1998-I; Salomonsson v. Sweden, no. 38978/97, § 34, 12 November 2002; Lundevall v. Sweden, no. 38629/97, § 34, 12 November 2002; Döry v. Sweden, no. 28394/95, § 37, 12 November 2002; Göç v. Turkey [GC], no. 36590/97, §§ 47-52, ECHR 2002-V; and Vilho Eskelinen and Others v. Finland [GC], no. 63235/00, § 73, ECHR 2007-IV).
• EGMR, 03.04.2001 - 27229/95

  KEENAN v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

  Auszug aus EGMR, 13.10.2011 - 36801/06

  The Supreme Court thus referred in particular to the judgment in Keenan v. the United Kingdom (no. 27229/95, § 130, ECHR 2001-III).
• EGMR, 23.02.1994 - 18928/91

  FREDIN c. SUÈDE (N° 2)

  Auszug aus EGMR, 13.10.2011 - 36801/06

  The Court reiterates that in proceedings before a court of first and only instance the right to a "public hearing" under Article 6 § 1 entails an entitlement to an "oral hearing" unless there are exceptional circumstances that justify dispensing with such a hearing (see, for instance, Fredin v. Sweden (no. 2), 23 February 1994, §§ 21-22, Series A no. 283-A; Fischer v. Austria, 26 April 1995, § 44, Series A no. 312; Allan Jacobsson v. Sweden (no. 2), 19 February 1998, § 46, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1998-I; Salomonsson v. Sweden, no. 38978/97, § 34, 12 November 2002; Lundevall v. Sweden, no. 38629/97, § 34, 12 November 2002; Döry v. Sweden, no. 28394/95, § 37, 12 November 2002; Göç v. Turkey [GC], no. 36590/97, §§ 47-52, ECHR 2002-V; and Vilho Eskelinen and Others v. Finland [GC], no. 63235/00, § 73, ECHR 2007-IV).

• EGMR, 09.06.2016 - 44164/14

  Pharma-Erbe siegt vor EGMR: LG Dresden hat Recht auf faires Verfahren verletzt

  Die Möglichkeit, von einer mündlichen Anhörung des Betroffenen Abstand zu nehmen, sei nicht auf seltene Ausnahmefälle beschränkt (mit Verweis auf Fexler./. Schweden, Individualbeschwerde Nr. 36801/06, Rdnr. 57, 13. Oktober 2011).
• EGMR, 16.03.2017 - 23621/11

  Fröbrich ./. Deutschland - Stasi-Informant muss Entschädigung wegen DDR-Haft …

  Die Möglichkeit, von einer persönlichen Anhörung des Betroffenen Abstand zu nehmen, sei nicht auf seltene Ausnahmefälle beschränkt (mit Verweis auf Fexler./. Schweden, Individualbeschwerde Nr. 36801/06, Rdnr. 57, 13. Oktober 2011).
• EGMR, 21.05.2013 - 21623/09

  TU AND CO AB v. SWEDEN

  Also, provided a public hearing has been held at first instance, a less strict standard applies to the appellate level, at which the absence of such a hearing may be justified by the special features of the proceedings at issue (see, for example, Fexler v. Sweden, no. 36801/06, § 58, 13 October 2011).