Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  S.I. v. SLOVENIA

  Art. 8, Art. 8 Abs. 1, Art. 41 MRK
  Remainder inadmissible Violation of Art. 8 Non-pecuniary damage - award (englisch)

Verfahrensgang

• EGMR, 13.10.2011 - 45082/05
• EGMR, 27.03.2019 - 45082/05

Wird zitiert von ... (0)Neu Zitiert selbst (6)

• EGMR, 08.07.1999 - 23536/94

  Strafrechtliche Verfolgung auf Grund der Veröffentlichung eines Buches mit …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 13.10.2011 - 45082/05

  As regards the proceedings before the Court, it reiterates that it does not consider itself bound by domestic scales and practices, although it may derive some assistance from them (see, among many other authorities, Tolstoy Miloslavsky v. the United Kingdom, 13 July 1995, § 77, Series A no. 316-B, and Baskaya and OkçuoÄ?lu v. Turkey [GC], nos. 23536/94 and 24408/94, § 98, ECHR 1999-IV).
• EGMR, 25.01.2000 - 31679/96

  IGNACCOLO-ZENIDE v. ROMANIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 13.10.2011 - 45082/05

  Article 8 includes for parents a right that steps be taken to reunite them with their children and an obligation on the national authorities to facilitate such reunions (see, among other authorities, Ignaccolo-Zenide v. Romania, no. 31679/96, § 94, ECHR 2000-I, and Fusca v. Romania, no. 34630/07, § 34, 13 July 2010).
• EGMR, 05.04.2005 - 71099/01

  MONORY v. ROMANIA AND HUNGARY

  Auszug aus EGMR, 13.10.2011 - 45082/05

  The Court notes that the mutual enjoyment by parent and child of each other's company constitutes a fundamental element of "family life" within the meaning of Article 8 of the Convention (see, among other authorities, Monory v. Romania and Hungary, no. 71099/01, § 70, 5 April 2005).

 
• EGMR, 13.07.2010 - 34630/07

  FUSCA v. ROMANIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 13.10.2011 - 45082/05

  Article 8 includes for parents a right that steps be taken to reunite them with their children and an obligation on the national authorities to facilitate such reunions (see, among other authorities, Ignaccolo-Zenide v. Romania, no. 31679/96, § 94, ECHR 2000-I, and Fusca v. Romania, no. 34630/07, § 34, 13 July 2010).
• EGMR, 23.09.1994 - 19823/92

  HOKKANEN v. FINLAND

  Auszug aus EGMR, 13.10.2011 - 45082/05

  In cases concerning the enforcement of decisions in the sphere of family law, the Court has repeatedly found that what is decisive is whether the national authorities have taken all necessary steps to facilitate the execution as can reasonably be demanded in the special circumstances of each case (see, mutatis mutandis, Hokkanen v. Finland, 23 September 1994, § 58, Series A no. 299-A, and Ignaccolo-Zenide, cited above, § 96).
• EGMR, 13.07.1995 - 18139/91

  TOLSTOY MILOSLAVSKY v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

  Auszug aus EGMR, 13.10.2011 - 45082/05

  As regards the proceedings before the Court, it reiterates that it does not consider itself bound by domestic scales and practices, although it may derive some assistance from them (see, among many other authorities, Tolstoy Miloslavsky v. the United Kingdom, 13 July 1995, § 77, Series A no. 316-B, and Baskaya and OkçuoÄ?lu v. Turkey [GC], nos. 23536/94 and 24408/94, § 98, ECHR 1999-IV).