Rechtsprechung
   EGMR, 13.10.2016 - 1870/05   

Zitiervorschläge
https://dejure.org/2016,33037
EGMR, 13.10.2016 - 1870/05 (https://dejure.org/2016,33037)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 13.10.2016 - 1870/05 (https://dejure.org/2016,33037)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 13. Oktober 2016 - 1870/05 (https://dejure.org/2016,33037)
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2016,33037) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.

Volltextveröffentlichung

Sonstiges

 
Sortierung



Kontextvorschau





Hinweis: Klicken Sie auf das Sprechblasensymbol, um eine Kontextvorschau im Fließtext zu sehen. Um alle zu sehen, genügt ein Doppelklick.

Wird zitiert von ... (2)Neu Zitiert selbst (5)

  • EGMR, 15.01.2009 - 28261/06

    COSIC v. CROATIA

    Auszug aus EGMR, 13.10.2016 - 1870/05
    It appears that in the present case applicable law did not afford to the applicant any meaningful forum in which she could object against cohabitation with A.N., V.S. and their acquaintances on the ground that such cohabitation created disproportionate consequences for her rights guaranteed by Article 8 of the Convention (see, mutatis mutandis, McCann v. the United Kingdom, no. 19009/04, §§ 49-50 and 55, ECHR 2008; Cosic v. Croatia, no. 28261/06, § 21-23, 15 January 2009; and B. v. the Republic of Moldova, no. 61382/09, § 74, 16 July 2013) and obtain appropriate and expeditious protection against unwanted intrusions into her personal space and home, including, if necessary, by way of an injunction order (see, mutatis mutandis, Söderman, § 85).
  • EGMR, 16.07.2013 - 61382/09

    B. v. THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA

    Auszug aus EGMR, 13.10.2016 - 1870/05
    It appears that in the present case applicable law did not afford to the applicant any meaningful forum in which she could object against cohabitation with A.N., V.S. and their acquaintances on the ground that such cohabitation created disproportionate consequences for her rights guaranteed by Article 8 of the Convention (see, mutatis mutandis, McCann v. the United Kingdom, no. 19009/04, §§ 49-50 and 55, ECHR 2008; Cosic v. Croatia, no. 28261/06, § 21-23, 15 January 2009; and B. v. the Republic of Moldova, no. 61382/09, § 74, 16 July 2013) and obtain appropriate and expeditious protection against unwanted intrusions into her personal space and home, including, if necessary, by way of an injunction order (see, mutatis mutandis, Söderman, § 85).
  • EGMR, 15.12.2015 - 38435/13

    B.V. AND OTHERS v. CROATIA

    Auszug aus EGMR, 13.10.2016 - 1870/05
    For this positive obligation to arise, it must be established that the ill-treatment complained of reached the threshold of severity proscribed under Article 3 (see B.V. and Others v. Croatia (dec.), no. 38435/13, §§ 152-53, 15 December 2015) or that the authorities knew or ought to have known at the time of the existence of a real and immediate risk of such ill-treatment (see orÄ‘evic v. Croatia, no. 41526/10, § 139, ECHR 2012).
  • EGMR, 03.09.2015 - 10161/13

    M. AND M. v. CROATIA

    Auszug aus EGMR, 13.10.2016 - 1870/05
    This assessment should, above all, take due account of the psychological effect that the risk of repeated harassment, intimidation and violence may have on the victim's everyday life (see Valiuliene, cited above, §§ 68-69; orÄ‘evic, cited above, §§ 90-93; and M. and M. v. Croatia, no. 10161/13, §§ 141-42, ECHR 2015 (extracts)).
  • EGMR, 29.10.2013 - 11160/07

    D.F. v. LATVIA

    Auszug aus EGMR, 13.10.2016 - 1870/05
    This requirement extends to ill-treatment administered by private individuals (see, among other authorities, D.F. v. Latvia, no. 11160/07, § 83, 29 October 2013 and Valiuliene v. Lithuania, no. 33234/07, § 75, 26 March 2013).
  • EGMR, 05.11.2020 - 31454/10

    CWIK v. POLAND

    This obligation has been recognised, inter alia, in the following "private" contexts: a stepfather beating a child with a cane (see A. v. UK, cited above, §§ 22-24); neglect and abuse suffered by children at the hands of their parents (see Z and Others, cited above, § 74) or their stepfather (see E. and Others v. the United Kingdom, no. 33218/96, § 89, 26 November 2002); rape (see, among other authorities, M.C. v. Bulgaria, cited above, § 148, and S.Z. v. Bulgaria, no. 29263/12, § 41, 3 March 2015); violent assault on worshipers (see Members of the Gldani Congregation of Jehovah's Witnesses and Others v. Georgia, no. 71156/01, § 102, 3 May 2007); acts of domestic violence and threatening conduct (see, among other authorities, Opuz v. Turkey, no. 33401/02, § 161, ECHR 2009, and Volodina v. Russia, no. 41261/17, §§ 74-75, 9 July 2019); sectarian violence towards schoolchildren and their parents (see P.F. and E.F. v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 28326/09, 23 November 2010, § 38); serious assaults on individuals (see, for example, Beganovic, cited above, § 66; Denis Vasilyev v. Russia, no. 32704/04, § 95, 17 December 2009; Dimitar Shopov v. Bulgaria, no. 17253/07, § 49, 16 April 2013; and Irina Smirnova v. Ukraine, no. 1870/05, § 73, 13 October 2016); attack on a Hare Krishna member (see Milanovic v. Serbia, no. 44614/07, § 87, 14 December 2010); sterilisation of Roma woman without informed consent (see V.C. v. Slovakia, no. 18968/07, § 119, ECHR 2011 (extracts); sexual abuse of children by a teacher in primary school (see O"Keeffe, cited above, § 153); homophobic violence (see Identoba and Others v. Georgia, no. 73235/12, § 71, 12 May 2015); and a child's ill-treatment by teachers of a nursery school (see V.K. v. Russia, no. 68059/13, § 172, 7 March 2017).
  • EGMR, 03.09.2020 - 17496/19

    LEVCHUK v. UKRAINE

    In this connection, the Court has held, in particular, that where an individual makes a credible assertion of having been subjected to repeated acts of domestic violence, however trivial the isolated incidents might be, it falls on the domestic authorities to assess the situation in its entirety, including the risk that similar incidents would continue (see, mutatis mutandis, Irina Smirnova v. Ukraine, no. 1870/05, §§ 71 and 89, 13 October 2016).
Haben Sie eine Ergänzung? Oder haben Sie einen Fehler gefunden? Schreiben Sie uns.
Sie können auswählen (Maus oder Pfeiltasten):
(Liste aufgrund Ihrer bisherigen Eingabe)
Komplette Übersicht