Rechtsprechung
EGMR, 13.10.2020 - 49020/08 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2020,30322) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
MYASNIK MALKHASYAN v. ARMENIA
Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-1 - Lawful arrest or detention;Article 5-1-c - Reasonable suspicion) (englisch)
Sonstiges
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)
[ENG]
Verfahrensgang
- EGMR, 13.10.2020 - 49020/08
- EGMR, 15.10.2020 - 49020/08
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (6)
- EGMR, 28.06.2007 - 36549/03
Recht auf ein faires Strafverfahren (Beweisverwertungsverbot; Verwertungsverbot …
Auszug aus EGMR, 13.10.2020 - 49020/08
The Court notes that the alleged costs of food parcels and transport are not substantiated with any proof and, in any event, the costs in question were allegedly borne by the applicant's family, who were not applicants in the present case and cannot therefore be regarded as persons directly affected by the violation found (see Harutyunyan v. Armenia, no. 36549/03, § 71, ECHR 2007-III). - EGMR, 17.07.2014 - 47848/08
CENTRE FOR LEGAL RESOURCES ON BEHALF OF VALENTIN CÂMPEANU v. ROMANIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 13.10.2020 - 49020/08
It is true that since the Grand Chamber judgment in Centre for Legal Resources on behalf of Valentin Câmpeanu v. Romania ([GC], no. 47848/08, ECHR 2014), the Court has frequently used the so-called "Câmpeanu formula" in order not to examine in extenso peripheral or secondary complaints or complaints which are in one way or another absorbed by the main complaint. - EGMR, 03.10.2006 - 543/03
McKAY c. ROYAUME-UNI
Auszug aus EGMR, 13.10.2020 - 49020/08
In this connection, the Court reiterates that the persistence of reasonable suspicion that an arrested person has committed an offence is a prerequisite for the lawfulness of his continued detention (see, among many other authorities, McKay v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 543/03, § 44, ECHR 2006-X).
- EGMR, 31.07.2000 - 34578/97
JECIUS v. LITHUANIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 13.10.2020 - 49020/08
A person may be detained under Article 5 § 1 (c) only in the context of criminal proceedings, for the purpose of bringing him before the competent legal authority on "reasonable suspicion" of "having committed an offence" (see Jecius v. Lithuania, no. 34578/97, § 50, ECHR 2000-IX, and Rasul Jafarov v. Azerbaijan, no. 69981/14, § 114, 17 March 2016). - EGMR, 13.02.2001 - 23541/94
Recht auf Akteneinsicht bei der Haftprüfung (wesentliche Verfahrensakten; …
Auszug aus EGMR, 13.10.2020 - 49020/08
Equality of arms is not ensured if counsel is denied access to those documents in the investigation file which are essential in order effectively to challenge the lawfulness of his client's detention (see, among other authorities, Nikolova v. Bulgaria [GC], no. 31195/96, § 58, ECHR 1999-II, and Garcia Alva v. Germany, no. 23541/94, § 39, 13 February 2001). - EGMR, 17.03.2016 - 69981/14
RASUL JAFAROV v. AZERBAIJAN
Auszug aus EGMR, 13.10.2020 - 49020/08
A person may be detained under Article 5 § 1 (c) only in the context of criminal proceedings, for the purpose of bringing him before the competent legal authority on "reasonable suspicion" of "having committed an offence" (see Jecius v. Lithuania, no. 34578/97, § 50, ECHR 2000-IX, and Rasul Jafarov v. Azerbaijan, no. 69981/14, § 114, 17 March 2016).