Rechtsprechung
EGMR, 13.11.2008 - 39964/02 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2008,66126) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
KHAYLO v. UKRAINE
(englisch)
Verfahrensgang
- EGMR, 28.06.2005 - 39964/02
- EGMR, 13.11.2008 - 39964/02
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (5)
- EGMR, 04.04.2006 - 32478/02
SERGEY SHEVCHENKO v. UKRAINE
Auszug aus EGMR, 13.11.2008 - 39964/02
The relevant provisions of the Constitution and the Code of Criminal Procedure can be found in the judgments in the cases of Sergey Shevchenko v. Ukraine (no. 32478/02, §§ 36-39, 4 April 2006), and Yakovenko v. Ukraine (no. 15825/06, §§ 46-47, 25 October 2007).Analysing the facts of the present case in light of the general principles concerning the duty of the States to ensure an effective investigation of suspicious deaths (see e.g. Gongadze v. Ukraine, no. 34056/02, §§ 175-177, ECHR 2005, and Sergey Shevchenko v. Ukraine, no. 32478/02, §§ 63-65, 4 April 2006), the Court notes at the outset that the Government have presented no documents shedding light on the steps taken by the investigative authorities to discharge this duty.
- EGMR, 08.11.2005 - 34056/02
GONGADZE c. UKRAINE
Auszug aus EGMR, 13.11.2008 - 39964/02
Analysing the facts of the present case in light of the general principles concerning the duty of the States to ensure an effective investigation of suspicious deaths (see e.g. Gongadze v. Ukraine, no. 34056/02, §§ 175-177, ECHR 2005, and Sergey Shevchenko v. Ukraine, no. 32478/02, §§ 63-65, 4 April 2006), the Court notes at the outset that the Government have presented no documents shedding light on the steps taken by the investigative authorities to discharge this duty. - EGMR, 22.11.2005 - 14183/02
ANTONENKOV AND OTHERS v. UKRAINE
Auszug aus EGMR, 13.11.2008 - 39964/02
As regards the Government's submission concerning the non-observance of the six-month rule, the Court notes that where no effective remedy is available, the six-month period runs from the act alleged to constitute a violation of the Convention (see e.g., Antonenkov and Others v. Ukraine, no. 14183/02, § 32, 22 November 2005). - EGMR, 10.08.2006 - 55389/00
DOBREV v. BULGARIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 13.11.2008 - 39964/02
In absence of any plea concerning non-exhaustion on the Government's behalf, the Court will normally assume that an applicant exhausted all the remedies, which, in the particular circumstances of his case, could have been effective (see Sejdovic v. Italy [GC], no. 56581/00, § 46, ECHR 2006, and Dobrev v. Bulgaria, no. 55389/00, §§ 112-114, 10 August 2006). - EGMR, 20.09.2007 - 15002/02
SERDYUK v. UKRAINE
Auszug aus EGMR, 13.11.2008 - 39964/02
In other words, the applicant must show that prosecution for a criminal offence was indissociable from his ability to exercise a right to bring civil proceedings in domestic law (see e.g. Perez v. France [GC], no. 47287/99, §§ 67-70, ECHR 2004-I, and Serdyuk v. Ukraine, no. 15002/02, § 25, 20 September 2007).