Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  ALEKSEYEV v. RUSSIA

  Art. 6, Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1 MRK
  Inadmissible (englisch)

Sonstiges

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  [ENG]

Wird zitiert von ... (3)Neu Zitiert selbst (2)

• EGMR, 07.05.2002 - 59498/00

  BURDOV v. RUSSIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 13.11.2008 - 5836/05

  With regard to the substance of the complaint, the Court reiterates that an unreasonably long delay in the enforcement of a binding judgment may breach the Convention (see Burdov v. Russia, no. 59498/00, ECHR 2002-III).
• EGMR, 15.02.2007 - 22000/03

  RAYLYAN v. RUSSIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 13.11.2008 - 5836/05

  To decide if the delay was reasonable, the Court will look at how complex the enforcement proceedings were, how the applicant and the authorities behaved, and what the nature of the award was (see Raylyan v. Russia, no. 22000/03, § 31, 15 February 2007).

• EGMR, 19.11.2009 - 8107/06

  SKALOUKHOV AND OTHERS v. UKRAINE

  The Court considers that the period of enforcement does not fall within the period to be taken into account in respect of the complaint concerning the length of the proceedings because the applicants have made a separate complaint about the non-enforcement proper (see Malama v. Greece, no. 43622/98, § 34 ECHR 2001-II, and Alekseyev v. Russia (dec.), no. 5836/05, 13 November 2008).
• EGMR, 08.10.2009 - 27440/03

  FINKOV v. RUSSIA

  Secondly, the periods of pure non-enforcement should not be taken into account in respect of the complaint concerning the length if the Court has already considered these periods when assessing the complaint about the non-enforcement (see Malama v. Greece, no. 43622/98, § 34, ECHR 2001-II; Androsov v. Russia, no. 63973/00, § 76, 6 October 2005; Alekseyev v. Russia (dec.), no. 5836/05, 13 November 2008; Lukyanchenko v. Ukraine, no. 17327/02, § 33, 15 May 2008; Kabkov v. Russia, no. 12377/03, § 49, 17 July 2008; and Veretennikov v. Russia, no. 8363/03, § 31, 12 March 2009).
• EGMR, 12.03.2009 - 8363/03

  VERETENNIKOV v. RUSSIA

  The Court considers that the period of enforcement does not fall within the period to be taken into account in respect of the complaint concerning the length of the proceedings because the applicant has made a separate complaint about the non-enforcement proper (see Malama v. Greece, no. 43622/98, § 34 ECHR 2001-II, and Alekseyev v. Russia (dec.), no. 5836/05, 13 November 2008).